Problem Set 3: First-Quantized vs. Second-Quantized Operators and Coherent States, Assignments of Health sciences

Problem set solutions for a physics course, focusing on the differences between first-quantized and second-quantized forms of one-body and two-body operators acting on identical bosons, as well as the properties of coherent states for harmonic oscillators and quantum fields. Students are asked to show that the wave function of a reduced (n-1)-particle state can be derived from a given n-particle state, and to verify the equivalence of first- and second-quantized forms of one-body and two-body operators. The document also covers the properties of coherent states, including their uncertainties and time evolution.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/30/2009

koofers-user-ie1
koofers-user-ie1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
PHY–396 K. Problem set #3. Due September 23, 2003.
1. The first exercise is about first-quantized v. second-quantized forms of one-body and two-body
operators acting on identical bosons. In class, we wrote the wave function of an N–particle
state |α1,...,αNi=¯¯{nβ}®as
φα1,...,αN(x1,...,xN) = sQβnβ!
N!X
distinct permutations
α1,..., ˜αN) of (α1,...,αN)
φ˜α1(x1)···φ˜αN(xN),(1)
and we defined the annihilation operators ˆaαaccording to
ˆaα¯¯{nβ}®=nα¯¯{n0
β=nβδαβ}®.(2)
(a) Consider an N–particle state |N, Ψiwith a completely generic totally-symmetric wave
function Ψ(x1,...,xN). Show that the (N1)–particle state |(N1),Ψ0i= ˆaγ|N, Ψi
has wave function
Ψ0(x1,...,xN1) = NZd3xNφ
γ(xN) Ψ(x1, . . . , xN1,xN).(3)
Hint: First verify this formula for Ψ of the form (1), and then generalize to arbitrary (but
totally-symmetric) Ψ by linearity.
Now consider a one-body operator ˆ
R1. In the first-quantized formalism ˆ
Rtot acts on N–particle
states according to
ˆ
R(1)
tot =
N
X
i=1
ˆ
R1(ith particle) (4)
while in the second-quantized formalism it becomes
ˆ
R(2)
tot =X
α,β hα|ˆ
R1|βiˆa
αˆaβ.(5)
(b) Use eq. (3) to verify that for any two N–particle states hN, Ψ1|and |N, Ψ2i
hN, Ψ1|ˆ
R(1)
tot |N, Ψ2i=hN , Ψ1|ˆ
R(2)
tot |N, Ψ2i.(6)
Hint: Use ˆ
R1=Pα,β |αihα|ˆ
R1|βihβ|.
1
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Problem Set 3: First-Quantized vs. Second-Quantized Operators and Coherent States and more Assignments Health sciences in PDF only on Docsity!

PHY–396 K. Problem set #3. Due September 23, 2003.

  1. The first exercise is about first-quantized v. second-quantized forms of one-body and two-body

operators acting on identical bosons. In class, we wrote the wave function of an N –particle

state |α 1

,... , α N

{n β

as

φ α 1 ,...,αN

(x 1

,... , x N

β

n β

N!

distinct permutations

(˜α 1 ,...,α˜N ) of (α 1 ,...,αN )

φ α˜ 1

(x 1

) · · · φ α˜N

(x N

and we defined the annihilation operators ˆa α

according to

ˆa α

{n β

{n

β

= n β

− δ αβ

(a) Consider an N –particle state |N, Ψ〉 with a completely generic totally-symmetric wave

function Ψ(x 1 ,... , x N

). Show that the (N − 1)–particle state |(N − 1), Ψ

〉 = ˆaγ |N, Ψ〉

has wave function

(x 1

,... , x N − 1

N

d

3

x N

φ

γ

(x N

) Ψ(x 1

,... , x N − 1

, x N

Hint: First verify this formula for Ψ of the form (1), and then generalize to arbitrary (but

totally-symmetric) Ψ by linearity.

Now consider a one-body operator

R

1

. In the first-quantized formalism

R

tot

acts on N –particle

states according to

R

(1)

tot

N ∑

i=

R

1

(i

th

particle) (4)

while in the second-quantized formalism it becomes

R

(2)

tot

α,β

〈α|

R 1 |β〉 ˆa

α

ˆa β

(b) Use eq. (3) to verify that for any two N –particle states 〈N, Ψ 1

| and |N, Ψ 2

〈N, Ψ

1

R

(1)

tot

|N, Ψ

2

〉 = 〈N, Ψ

1

R

(2)

tot

|N, Ψ

2

Hint: Use

R

1

α,β

|α〉 〈α|

R

1

|β〉 〈β|.

Next, consider a two-body operator

S

2

which acts in the first-quantized formalism according

to

S

(1)

tot

1

2

i 6 =j

S 2 (i

th

and j

th

particles) (7)

and in the second-quantized formalism according to

S

(2)

tot

α,β,γ,δ

〈α| ⊗ 〈β|

S

2

|γ〉 ⊗ |δ〉 ˆa

α

β

ˆa γ

ˆa δ

(c) Again, show that for any two N –particle states 〈N, Ψ 1

| and |N, Ψ 2

〈N, Ψ 1 |

S

(1)

tot

|N, Ψ 2 〉 = 〈N, Ψ 1 |

S

(2)

tot

|N, Ψ 2 〉. (9)

(d) Finally, let

A

1

be a one-body operator, let

B

2

and

C

2

be two-body operators, and let

A,

B and

C be the corresponding second-quantized operators defined similar to eqs. (5)

and (8).

Show that if

C

2

[(

A

1

st

) +

A

1

nd

)

B

2

]

then

C = [

A,

B]

Hint: First, calculate the commutator [ˆa

αˆa

β

ˆaγ ˆa δ

, aˆ

μˆaν ].

  1. The second problem is about coherent states of harmonic oscillators and free quantum fields.

Let us start with a harmonic oscillator

H = ¯hωˆa

† ˆa.

(a) For any complex number ξ we define a coherent state |ξ〉

def

= exp

ξˆa

† − ξ

∗ ˆa

| 0 〉. Show

that

|ξ〉 = e

−|ξ|

2 / 2

e

ξˆa

| 0 〉 and ˆa |ξ〉 = ξ |ξ〉. (10)

(b) Calculate the uncertainties ∆q and ∆p for a coherent state |ξ〉 and verify their minimality:

∆q∆p =

1

2

¯h. Also, verify δn =

n¯ where ¯n

def

= 〈nˆ〉 = |ξ|

2

.

Hint: use ˆa |ξ〉 = ξ |ξ〉 and 〈ξ| ˆa

† = ξ

∗ 〈ξ|.

(c) Show that for ξ(t) = ξ 0

e

−eωt the coherent state |ξ(t)〉 satisfies the time-dependent

Schr¨odinger equation i¯h

d

dt

|ξ(t)〉 =

H |ξ(t)〉.