Problem Set 5 - Quantum Physics | PHYS 130A, Study notes of Quantum Physics

Problem Set #5 Material Type: Notes; Professor: Sham; Class: Quantum Physics; Subject: Physics; University: University of California - San Diego; Term: Spring 2009;

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 05/12/2011

koofers-user-k8e-4
koofers-user-k8e-4 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
L.J. Sham May 8, 2009
Physics 130A Problem Set 5
1. Eigenstates in a square well with odd parity Griffiths, Problem 2.29 on p. 82.
2. Scatter by a step potential Griffiths, Problem 2.35 on p. 84.
3. Esaki diode The tunneling probability for the electrons through a tunnel diode is increased
by a factor of 10 when the oxide layer thickness is halved. Find the ratio of the tunneling
probabilities when the oxide thickness of the original diode is reduced to one-fourth.
4. Scattering by a delta potential The potential of a particle of mass mis given by,
V(x) = ~2λ
mδ(x),(1)
where λmay be positive or negative.
(a) In the case of repulsive potential, find the transmission and reflection coefficients inde-
pendently for energy E > 0and show that they add up to unity.
(b) in the attractive case, show that the transmission coefficient for the positive incoming
particle energy ~2k2/2m > 0has a pole in the continuation to the complex kplane
which coincides with the bound state imaginary wave vector.
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Problem Set 5 - Quantum Physics | PHYS 130A and more Study notes Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

L.J. Sham May 8, 2009

Physics 130A Problem Set 5

  1. Eigenstates in a square well with odd parity Griffiths, Problem 2.29 on p. 82.
  2. Scatter by a step potential Griffiths, Problem 2.35 on p. 84.
  3. Esaki diode The tunneling probability for the electrons through a tunnel diode is increased by a factor of 10 when the oxide layer thickness is halved. Find the ratio of the tunneling probabilities when the oxide thickness of the original diode is reduced to one-fourth.
  4. Scattering by a delta potential The potential of a particle of mass m is given by,

V (x) =

ℏ^2 λ m

δ(x), (1)

where λ may be positive or negative.

(a) In the case of repulsive potential, find the transmission and reflection coefficients inde- pendently for energy E > 0 and show that they add up to unity. (b) in the attractive case, show that the transmission coefficient for the positive incoming particle energy ℏ^2 k^2 / 2 m > 0 has a pole in the continuation to the complex k plane which coincides with the bound state imaginary wave vector.

L.J. Sham May 8, 2009

Physics 130A Problem Set 5

  1. Eigenstates in a square well with odd parity Griffiths, Problem 2.29 on p. 82.

Solution – Use the potential and notations in Lecture 12. The wave functions are odd in x, i.e.,ψ(−x) = −ψ(x). Hence, the solution may be written as,

for |x| < a, ψ(x) = B sin kx; for |x| > a, ψ(x) = sgn(x)De−κ|x|, (1) where sgn(x) = +1, if x > 0; sgn(x) = − 1 , if x < 0. (2)

We have again excluded the exponentially growing solutions dominating at long distances. By symmetry, the boundary conditions satisfied at x = a will also be satisfied at x = −a. Hence,

B sin ka = De−κa, kB cos ka = −κDe−κa. (3)

Division of the right equation by the left one leads to,

k cot ka = −κ. (4)

Letting ξ = ka, η = κa, we obtain the two relations:

ξ^2 + η^2 = 2 mV a^2 /ℏ^2 , (5) ξ tan

( (^) π 2

  • ξ

= η. (6)

The graphical solutions are also shown as the dashed lines in Fig. 1.

η

0 π/2 π 3π/2 ξ

Figure 1: Square well solutions. The circular segment is given by ξ^2 + η^2 = 16. The dashed lines, ξ tan(ξ + π/2) = η, lead to the odd parity solutions. The roots are circled.

In the limiting case where 2 mV a^2 /ℏ^2 < π/ 2 , there are no odd-parity bound states.

(b) The mix-up can only come from looney thinking from watching too many Looney Tunes. Since the gravitational potential energy is proportional to the height, the figure represents Bugs Bunny’s potential energy as a function of his horizontal distance x perfectly. As he comes off the edge, his height will drop if he knows physics but his total energy (kinetic plus potential) is still a constant E as in the scattering theory. “Thatttt is all, Folks!” (c) Again, E = V 0 / 3. So R = 19 and T = 1 − R = 89.

  1. Esaki diode The tunneling probability for the electrons through a tunnel diode is increased by a factor of 10 when the oxide layer thickness is halved. Find the ratio of the tunneling probabilities when the oxide thickness of the original diode is reduced to one-fourth.

Solution – The approximate formula for tunneling is [see Lecture 16, Eq. (20)],

Tn ≈ Tpe−^2 κa/n. (17)

The datum given is,

T 2 T 1

e−^2 κa/^2 e−^2 κa^

= eκa^ = 10. (18)

Thus,

T 4 T 1

e−^2 κa/^4 e−^2 κa^

= e

3 2 κa^ = 10^3 /^2 = 32. (19)

  1. Scattering by a delta potential The potential of a particle of mass m is given by,

V (x) =

ℏ^2 λ m

δ(x), (20)

where λ may be positive or negative.

(a) In the case of repulsive potential, find the transmission and reflection coefficients inde- pendently for energy E > 0 and show that they add up to unity. (b) in the attractive case, show that the transmission coefficient for the positive incoming particle energy ℏ^2 k^2 / 2 m > 0 has a pole in the continuation to the complex k plane which coincides with the bound state imaginary wave vector.

Solution – From Lecture 17, rewrite the Schr¨odinger equation in the form, for the energy eigenstate at energy E > 0 ,

d^2 ψ dx^2

= 2λδ(x)ψ −

2 mE ℏ^2

ψ. (21)

Except at x = 0, the solution for a continuum state, i.e. E > 0 , is

ψ(x) = Aeikx^ + Be−ikx^ if x < 0 , ψ(x) = Ceikx^ + DBe−kx^ if x > 0 , (22)

with the corresponding current density given by,

Jx =

2 mi

Ψ∗(x, t)

∂x

Ψ(x, t) − Ψ(x, t)

∂x

Ψ∗(x, t)

(x) =

ℏk m

(|A|^2 − |B|^2 ) if x < 0 ,

Jx =

ℏk m

(|C|^2 − |D|^2 ) if x > 0. (23)

To find a transmission and reflection coefficient, we inject particles only from the left, say. Then, there are no particles coming in from the right. Hence, D = 0.

To connect the wave functions in the two regions, the boundary conditions are continuity for the wave function,

ψ(x = +0) = ψ(x = −0). (24)

and the change in the first derivative of the wave function by integrating Eq. (21) from a small negative number to a small positive number,

ψ′(+0) − ψ′(−0) = 2λ ψ(0). (25)

(a) Thus, we have

C = A + B, ikC − 2 λC = ik(A − B). (26)

Hence, by multiplying the first equation by ik and adding or subtracting the result to or from the second divided,

C =

k k + iλ

A; B =

λ ik

C =

−iλ k + iλ

A. (27)

T =

C

A

2

k^2 k^2 + λ^2

; R =

B

A

2

λ^2 k^2 + λ^2

Evidently, T + R = 1. (b) Except at x = 0, the solution for a bound state, i.e. E < 0 , is

ψ(x) = Aeκx^ if x < 0 , ψ(x) = Be−κx^ if x > 0 , (29)

where

κ =

− 2 mE/ℏ^2 , (30)