Problem Set: Angular Momentum and Quantum States - Prof. Thomas D. Cohen, Assignments of Quantum Physics

This problem set covers various aspects of angular momentum and quantum states. Topics include showing that the angular momentum operator in a certain basis depends on the phase, normalization and expectation values calculation for a specific state, constructing matrices for angular momentum operators and verifying their commutation relations, and understanding the relationship between different basis sets. This problem set emphasizes the physical significance of relative phases and the importance of complete basis sets.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 02/13/2009

koofers-user-98d-1
koofers-user-98d-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Problem Set ---Due February 17
1) Consider a system whose angular state in the standard
lm
basis is given by
( )
2122
2
1
γ
ψ
i
e
+=
where γ is a phase. Show that
( )
γψψ
cos
ˆ
=
x
L
. The fact
that the expectation value depends on the phase γ is a demonstration of the general
principle that while the overall phase of a states is unphysical, the relative phase
between different components has physical significance.
2) Consider a system with a central potential. As noted in class the energy eigenstates
are of the form
mln
where n is the radial quantum number and l and m describe the
angular degrees of freedom. Suppose the system is in the state
( )
122122112012002001
10
3
10
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
++=
i
ψ
.Verify that the
state is normalized and calculate the following expectation values:
ψψ
z
L
ˆ
ψψ
2
ˆ
L
ψψ
2
ˆ
z
L
ψψ
y
L
ˆ
ψψ
x
L
ˆ
3) In class we showed how to construct explicit matrices for the operators
x
L
ˆ
,
y
L
ˆ
,
and
and that the matrices were block diagonal.
a) Working in the block with l=1 explicitly construct the 3 by 3 matrices associated
with these four operators.
b) Denote the matrices associated with
x
L
ˆ
,
y
L
ˆ
,
as
x
L
,
y
L
,
show that they
satisfy the same commutation relations as the operators:
[ ]
zyx
LiLL
=
,
[ ]
xzy
LiLL
=
,
[ ]
yxz
LiLL
=
,
c) Show that as matrices
2
222
LLLL
xxx
=++
where
is the matrix associated with
.
4) We arbitrarily choose to work with a basis of states which were eigenstates of
and
we
equally well could have picked
x
L
ˆ
and
. Let us denote the new basis as the primed
basis. The primed basis states are normalized and have the following properties
''
ˆ
mlmmlL
x
=
(i)
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Problem Set: Angular Momentum and Quantum States - Prof. Thomas D. Cohen and more Assignments Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Problem Set ---Due February 17

  1. Consider a system whose angular state in the standard lm^ basis is given by

2

1 γ ψ

i

= + e where γ is a phase. Show that ψ ψ cos( γ)

x

L (^). The fact

that the expectation value depends on the phase γ is a demonstration of the general

principle that while the overall phase of a states is unphysical, the relative phase

between different components has physical significance.

  1. Consider a system with a central potential. As noted in class the energy eigenstates

are of the form n^ lm where n is the radial quantum number and l and m describe the

angular degrees of freedom. Suppose the system is in the state

10

3

10

1

2

1

2

1

2

1 ψ = − − + i + − − .Verify that the

state is normalized and calculate the following expectation values:

ψ ψ z

L

ψ ψ

2 ˆ L

ψ ψ

2 ˆ

z

L

ψ ψ y

L

ψ ψ x

L

  1. In class we showed how to construct explicit matrices for the operators x

L

y

L

z

L

and

2 ˆ L and that the matrices were block diagonal.

a) Working in the block with l =1 explicitly construct the 3 by 3 matrices associated

with these four operators.

b) Denote the matrices associated with x

L

y

L

z

L

as x

L

y

L

z

L

show that they

satisfy the same commutation relations as the operators:

[ ]

x y z

L L i L

[ ]

y z x

L L i L

[ ]

z x y

L L i L

c) Show that as matrices

(^2 )

L L L L x x x

    • = where

2 L

is the matrix associated with

2 ˆ L

  1. We arbitrarily choose to work with a basis of states which were eigenstates of z

L

and

2 ˆ L we

equally well could have picked x

L

and

2 ˆ L

. Let us denote the new basis as the primed

basis. The primed basis states are normalized and have the following properties

L lm mlm x

=  (i)

2 2 L lm =  l l + lm (ii)

by direct analogy with the usual basis states. Since each basis set is complete any of the

primed basis states can be written as a superposition of unprimed states with the same l:

1 2 1 2

l m ' c lm

n

∑ lm m

where lm 2 m 1

c (^) are coefficients.

a) Using the properties (i) and (ii) above the matrix elements we computed in class plus

normalization to show that

2

1

2

1

2

1 = + + −

2

1

2

1 = + −

2

1

2

1

2

1 − = − + −

b) Explain how the linear combinations given in part a) can be understood in terms of

the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the matrix x

L

constructed in problem 3.