Problems on Numerical Methods for Engineers - Assignment 3 | ENGR 351, Assignments of Engineering

Material Type: Assignment; Professor: Chevalier; Class: Numerical Methods; Subject: Engineering; University: Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Term: Fall 2009;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 02/24/2010

koofers-user-ek6-2
koofers-user-ek6-2 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ENGR 351 NUMERICAL METHODS FOR ENGINEERS
Fall 2009
College of Engineering
Instructor: L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E.
Due October 16, 2009
HOMEWORK 3B
Overview:
This homework will continue your study of the Gauss Seidel and Jacobi matrix methods. If you did not understand
part a, I recommend that you see me or the graduate teaching assistant.
Submit your Excel work electronically to [email protected].
PROBLEM 1
Design a spreadsheet to calculate a matrix using both Gauss Seidel and Jacobi with relaxation. The spreadsheet
should be designed to input a 3x3 matrix, a value of , and the initial estimates for {x}.
Evaluate the following set of equations. Use an initial estimate of {x}T = {1 1 1}
29 3
13 9
4 3 1 𝑥1
𝑥2
𝑥3 = 3
12
7
EXTRA CREDIT
This extra credit problem will require a more in-depth analysis of either the Jacobi or the Gauss Seidel method.
Specifically, you will develop graphs that will show if a is decreasing or x is converging. This is an open-ended
problem, which is important for engineering students to tackle.
1) The first part will require two graphs of your method without relaxation , using a diagonally dominant
matrix. Decide which value of x you will monitor (you are not required to do all three, but you may want
to). Provide a graph that shows how your value of x changes, and the corresponding value of a. For this
assignment, do not use the absolute value of a. This will allow you to see oscillations if they occur. Two
example graphs are shown below.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Problems on Numerical Methods for Engineers - Assignment 3 | ENGR 351 and more Assignments Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

ENGR 351 NUMERICAL METHODS FOR ENGINEERS

Fall 2009 College of Engineering Instructor: L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E.

Due October 16, 2009

HOMEWORK 3B

Overview:

This homework will continue your study of the Gauss Seidel and Jacobi matrix methods. If you did not understand part a, I recommend that you see me or the graduate teaching assistant.

Submit your Excel work electronically to [email protected].

PROBLEM 1

Design a spreadsheet to calculate a matrix using both Gauss Seidel and Jacobi with relaxation. The spreadsheet should be designed to input a 3x3 matrix, a value of , and the initial estimates for {x}.

Evaluate the following set of equations. Use an initial estimate of {x}T^ = {1 1 1}

EXTRA CREDIT

This extra credit problem will require a more in-depth analysis of either the Jacobi or the Gauss Seidel method. Specifically, you will develop graphs that will show if a is decreasing or x is converging. This is an open-ended problem, which is important for engineering students to tackle.

  1. The first part will require two graphs of your method without relaxation, using a diagonally dominant matrix. Decide which value of x you will monitor (you are not required to do all three, but you may want to). Provide a graph that shows how your value of x changes, and the corresponding value of a. For this assignment, do not use the absolute value of a. This will allow you to see oscillations if they occur. Two example graphs are shown below.

ENGR 351 F2009 Homework 1 Page 2

  1. Using the same number of iterations in part 1, develop two graphs showing your solution if you do not start with a diagonally dominant matrix. If you copy the worksheet from the first part to a new worksheet, you can do this fairly quickly, since you only need to change the values of [A] and {c}.
  2. Conduct a similar study to part one but using relaxation. Following the same requirements as part 1, develop two graphs. Clearly indicate in the chart title the value of  used. Try to reduce the number of iterations by changing the value of 
  3. Repeat the analysis without a diagonally dominant matrix. See if you can correct any divergence using different values of 
  4. Your spreadsheet should have a labeled tab (separate worksheet) for each method. Also include a final tab titled “Comparison graphs” that have all of your graphs (8 total)

Please see me if you need any clarification of help. You will submit this to me ([email protected]) by October 16, 2009. Early submission is okay. Label your file with your last name and EC (i.e. my file would be Chevalier- EC.xlsx). Have fun learning with this.