Process Costing: Father Vidal Clock Shop's Weighted-Average Costing Method, Exams of Cost Accounting

An analysis of father vidal clock shop's process costing using the weighted-average method. Data for the assembly department for june 19x1, and it calculates the equivalent units, direct materials cost per equivalent unit, conversion cost per equivalent unit, and total costs assigned to completed and transferred out and work in process, ending.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/23/2009

koofers-user-vti
koofers-user-vti 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Process Costing 1 of 4
Father Vidal Clock Shop
Father Vidal Clock Shop manufactures clocks on a highly automated assembly line. Its costing system
utilizes two cost categories; direct materials and conversion costs. Each product must pass through the
Assembly Department and the Testing Department. Direct materials are added at the beginning of the
production process. Conversion costs are allocated evenly throughout production. Weighted-average
costing is used by Father Vidal Clock Shop.
Data for the Assembly Department for June 19x1 are:
Work in Process units: Beginning 250 50.00% complete for conversion costs
Started in the month 800
Work in Process units: Ending 150 75.00% complete for conversion costs
Costs for June 19x1:
Work in Process units: Beginning
Cost of materials 18,000$
Conversion costs 27,000$
Total for work in process 45,000$
Materials added in the month 100,000$
Conversion costs incurred in the month 100,000$
Total 245,000$
Questions
1What are the equivalent units for direct materials and conversion costs, respectively?
2What is the total amount debited to the work-in-process account DURING the month of June?
3What is the direct materials cost per equivalent unit DURING June?
4What is the conversion cost per equivalent unit in June?
5What amount of conversion costs are assigned to ending work-in-process for June?
6Answer questions 1 - 6 assuming the company uses the FIFO method.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Process Costing: Father Vidal Clock Shop's Weighted-Average Costing Method and more Exams Cost Accounting in PDF only on Docsity!

Father Vidal Clock Shop

Father Vidal Clock Shop manufactures clocks on a highly automated assembly line. Its costing system utilizes two cost categories; direct materials and conversion costs. Each product must pass through the Assembly Department and the Testing Department. Direct materials are added at the beginning of the production process. Conversion costs are allocated evenly throughout production. Weighted-average costing is used by Father Vidal Clock Shop.

Data for the Assembly Department for June 19x1 are: Work in Process units: Beginning 250 50.00% complete for conversion costs Started in the month 800 Work in Process units: Ending 150 75.00% complete for conversion costs

Costs for June 19x1: Work in Process units: Beginning Cost of materials $ 18, Conversion costs $ 27, Total for work in process $ 45, Materials added in the month $ 100, Conversion costs incurred in the month $ 100, Total $ 245,

Questions 1 What are the equivalent units for direct materials and conversion costs, respectively? 2 What is the total amount debited to the work-in-process account DURING the month of June? 3 What is the direct materials cost per equivalent unit DURING June? 4 What is the conversion cost per equivalent unit in June? 5 What amount of conversion costs are assigned to ending work-in-process for June? 6 Answer questions 1 - 6 assuming the company uses the FIFO method.

Father Vidal Clock Shop Solution Weighted-average method Step 1: Flow of production Summarize Direct Conversion Units Physical Units Materials Costs Beginning work in process 50% 250 Started during current period 800 To account for 1, l1 Total Completed and transferred out 900 900 900 l2 Work in process, ending 75% 150 150 113 Accounted for 1, l3 Q1 Work done to date 1,050 1,

Direct Conversion Costs Totals Materials Costs Work in process beginning $ 45,000 $ 18,000 $ 27, Q2 Added during current period $200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100, (Step 3) Total costs to account for $245,000 $118,000 $127,

Divide by equivalent units in l3 ÷ 1,050 1,

l4 (Step 4) Equivalent unit costs $237.81 ‹ $112.38 + $125. Q3, Q (Step 5) Application of costs

[l1xl4] Completed and transferred out $214,032 ‹ 900 × $237.

[l2xl4] Work in process, ending 150 113

× $ 112.38 × $125.

Q5 $30,968 ‹ $16,857 + $14,

Total costs to account for $245,

FIFO Method Step 1: Step 2: Equivalent units Units Flow of production Summarize Direct Conversion Physical Units Materials Costs Completed and transferred out during current period l5 From beginning inventory 50% 250 125 l6 Started and completed 650 650 650 l7 Work in process, ending 75% 150 150 113 Accounted for 1, l8 Work done in current period only 800 888

Direct Conversion Costs Totals Materials Costs (Step 3) Added during current period $200,000 $100,000 $100,

Divide by equivalent units in l8 ÷ 800 888

l9 (Step 4) Equivalent unit costs $237.68 ‹ $125.00 + $112.

(Step 5) Assignment of costs Completed and transferred out Work in process beginning $45,000 given l5 0 125

l9 × $125.00 × $112.

[l5xl9] Added during current period $14,085 ‹ $0 = $14, Total for beginning inventory $59,

[l6xl9] Started and completed $154,489 ‹ 650 × $237.

Total costs transferred out $213, l7 150 113

l9 × $125.00 × $112.

[l7xl9] Work in process, ending $31,426 ‹ $18,750 + $12, Total costs to account for $245,

Plastic Molding, Inc. Solution Weighted-average method Step 1: Flow of production Summarize Direct Conversion Units Physical Units Materials Costs Beginning work in process 40% 400 Started during current period 1, To account for 1, l1 Total Completed and transferred out 1,400 1,400 1, l2 Work in process, ending 0% 200 200 0 Accounted for 1, l3 Q1 Work done to date 1,600 1,

Direct Conversion Costs Totals Materials Costs Work in process beginning $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 20, Q2 Added during current period $450,000 $ 200,000 $ 250, (Step 3) Total costs to account for $490,000 $220,000 $270,

Divide by equivalent units in l3 ÷ 1,600 1,

l4 (Step 4) Equivalent unit costs $330.36 ‹ $137.50 + $192. Q3, Q (Step 5) Application of costs

[l1xl4] Completed and transferred out $462,500 ‹ 1,400 × $330.

[l2xl4] Work in process, ending 200 0

× $ 137.50 × $192.

Q5 $27,500 ‹ $27,500 + $

Total costs to account for $490,

FIFO Method Step 1: Step 2: Equivalent units Units Flow of production Summarize Direct Conversion Physical Units Materials Costs Completed and transferred out during current period l5 From beginning inventory 40% 400 240 l6 Started and completed 1,000 1,000 1, l7 Work in process, ending 0% 200 200 0 Accounted for 1, l8 Work done in current period only 1,200 1,

Direct Conversion Costs Totals Materials Costs (Step 3) Added during current period $450,000 $200,000 $250,

Divide by equivalent units in l8 ÷ 1,200 1,

l9 (Step 4) Equivalent unit costs $368.28 ‹ $166.67 + $201.

(Step 5) Assignment of costs Completed and transferred out Work in process beginning $40,000 given l5 0 240

l9 × $166.67 × $201.

[l5xl9] Added during current period $48,387 ‹ $0 = $48, Total for beginning inventory $88,

[l6xl9] Started and completed $368,280 ‹ 1,000 × $368.

Total costs transferred out $456, l7 200 0

l9 × $166.67 × $201.

[l7xl9] Work in process, ending $33,333 ‹ $33,333 + $ Total costs to account for $490,