


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Chp 2 Material Type: Notes; Class: PRIN MICROECONOMICS; Subject: Economics; University: Louisiana State University; Term: Fall 2010;
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Econ 2000 Chp 2 Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) Assuming limited resources are aligned in such a way that goods maybe produced; there must be limits to what can be produced In analyzing such limits and tradeoffs the PPF is a tool for comparing the production of 2 goods Conditions of the Model
Reality is most choices do not entail constant opportunity costs First unit of any choice typically entails a lower opportunity cost than last First hour of study vs. fifth Law of increasing opportunity costs addresses this phenomenon by stating opportunity costs will increase as production increases This concept will hold true when analyzing production and not simply within context of PPF So if opportunity costs rise with each unit produced than first units produced of X will require fewer units forgone of Y than the last units of X Because of changing cost, slope changes when moving through the frontier PPF is curved not straight Why concave and not convex? Increasing not decreasing opportunity costs Very last good on margin of frontier is not least expensive in terms of opportunity Scarcity: limits of production Choice: different combinations available Opportunity cost: incurred with movement Efficiency vs. inefficiencies of production Productive efficiencies occurs when the economy operates on the frontier producing at the maximum Anything less is inefficient On frontier: efficient Should output fall beneath the frontier than it is likely there are unemployed resources Something is not being utilized if attained output is less than its potential Economic growth
A may not produce more but what it does produce comes at less of a cost (in terms of one good to another) than does B There fair if choosing one good entails a higher opportunity cost for B then B will produce the other good and trade with A for the first thus the decision to trade is determined not by who holds an absolute advantage but who holds the comparative advantage Trading will occur in quantities only such that the final mix enables a consumption level by and the original PPF of both parties There is no point in trading if it is worse for both parties