Download Professional ethics question papers and more Exams Professional Communication in PDF only on Docsity!
Law School Kantka Siate Law
Univeny,
Navnar, Hubli
Total Marks: 4 I Semester Date: 21-10-
Time: 3.00to 5.00 p.m.
S TEST
Professionat Etics and 7he Advocue^ Act,^1961
ephasbao, 190
Question paper consists^ "Part-A"^ and-jart-B 0u arries ten
marks.
t 0 0ur questions in qch part, anser
any two questions. Each Question
advoayde adth anen evgbbsb. Veznd
PART-A 2per1- Discuss about the duties of an Advocate to the OPonentad to Colleague.
Discuss about the Constytion and functions ofjte Bar Council md Bar Counci
of
India ,
Discuss about Advocate-being otherwise emply
the
Circumstances in which he
4 Whether^ Advocat^ .camrefuse^ th^ brief?^ Ifio,^ imetae
can refuse^ the^ buef^
otET
, PART-B
An Advocate^ on^ joining^ judicial^
service (^) got his license^
o (^) pice suspended. Later^ hee
was dismissed^ from^ serice^ on^ charges^
of comruption.^
FHe got resed license^ and^ started
practice. Meanwhile^ an^
complaint
icd (^) Stao Bar Council^ initiata
35(1) of^ Advocate's^
Act 1961 tenure as^ a^ judicial^ officer.^
Matier came to^ be
same was^ challenged^ in^
a Writ n^ the^ ground^
that at^ the^ tiE^ ot^ misconduct
alleged he^ was^ not^
practicing
avOcate. (^) Decide.
5) oceedings U/Sec.
in respect of misconductdone^ by^ Fdvocate^ during^ his
ficer. Matter^ came^ to^ be^ referred^
to Disciplinary^ Committee^
and
titi
CSolution of^ Bar^ Association^ coercina^ the^ Chief^
Justiceof High Cout to demit the^ óflice
gvdna uf financia!^ inegularity,^ was^ challenged^ iti^ public^
inter:st litigation under
Reso
Article 32 of^ the^ Constitution.^ Decade^ th:^ propriety^ of^ the Resolutwn^ calling^ upon^
the
Chief Jus'ice to demit office.
Afer (^) settlnq the Civil (^) Dispute parties bY way of compromise the accused beween (^) from the (^) oppOsiie (^) party AaVOcate hadsgken a hand loan of Rs. 3,000/-from lheopposiie party (^) andand diddid notnot repayrepay The Disciplhy Commitce of State Bar Council on the conmplaint fiked by opposite paty held^ him^ a^ guilty (^) of Distnlinry Committee of U/Seca8 of Advocates Act1961.^ Decide.
SConduct endsaid rder was copíirmed in appeai 5y,
Bar Council of India. Mater is seiZed by Supreme Court
3,000/ 3dog
(^1961) Ba (^) a aoenT (^7). (^) eDE (^) R.
- (^) In anappeal U/Sc (^38) ofAdvoCafea (^) Act (^1961) by that only two delinquent Advocate it (^) was (^) con closed, argumente rere he is'rlinary Commitee were present when defense was Committee (^) did not (^) participate md (^) order (^) passed (^) in (^) absence
of all^ three members 1S nuinty.
nded Committee (^) did not (^) particinat (^) inal rder Dassed. Third Member (^) of Disciplinary Respondent (^) placed (^) reliznce (^) on Section (^13) of (^) the Act. (^) Decide. Beo 38 0bD@ (^) 9DHas (^1961) esa apsty (^) anease, (^) iOAd Ds0JD
00ori
e9riDEOTDNesob (^) opAARO. (^) TDdbITDTTD (^8) Rbp, 3oo (^) 13, wGHor (^1961) a (^) esOoADRd. (^) DOEOA. 000DONE,
