Math 310: Proofs by Induction - Worksheet Solutions - Prof. Alexandra Nichifor, Assignments of Mathematics

Partial solutions to proofs by induction exercises in math 310. It includes two problems: proving that 3n >= n^3 for all n >= 4 and proving that 7 divides 2n+2 + 32n+1 for any non-negative integer n. The solutions involve scratch work, base case verification, and induction step proofs.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/10/2009

koofers-user-b23-1
koofers-user-b23-1 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 310: Proofs By Induction Worksheet Partial Solutions
1. Prove that for all n4,3nn3.
Scratch work:
(a) What is the predicate P(n) that we aim to prove for all nn0?
P(n) : 3nn3
(b) What is n0=? = 4
(c) So the base case consists of proving P(n0). Write out what this
means, specifically for this problem.
P(4) : 3443
Now verify it.
Since 34= 81 and 43= 64, clearly P(4) holds.
(d) The induction step is to show that P(k) => P (k+ 1) (for any
kn0). Spell this out.
3kk33k+1 (k+ 1)3for any k4
i. The Induction Hypothesis is P(k). Write it out.
P(k) : 3kk3
ii. Write out the goal: P(k+ 1).
P(k+ 1) : 3k+1 (k+ 1)3
iii. Rewrite the LHS of P(k+ 1) until you can relate it to the
LHS of P(k).
3k+1 = 3k˙
33˙
k3
iv. Rewrite the RHS of P(k+ 1) until you can relate it to the
RHS of P(k).
(k+ 1)3=k3+ 3k2+ 3k+ 1.
Want to show that this is less or equal to 3˙
k3
v. The induction hypothesis gives you the inequality between
certain ”chunks” of the RHS and LHS of P(k+1). It remains
to compare the remaining parts and show that the inequality
holds between those too. Can you think of a way?
Use the back of the page to write a clear, correct, succinct proof
of the statement.
——Try to figure this out for Wednesday————
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Math 310: Proofs by Induction - Worksheet Solutions - Prof. Alexandra Nichifor and more Assignments Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 310: Proofs By Induction Worksheet – Partial Solutions

  1. Prove that for all n ≥ 4 , 3 n^ ≥ n^3.

Scratch work:

(a) What is the predicate P(n) that we aim to prove for all n ≥ n 0?

P (n) : 3n^ ≥ n^3

(b) What is n 0 =? = 4 (c) So the base case consists of proving P (n 0 ). Write out what this means, specifically for this problem.

P (4) : 3^4 ≥ 43

Now verify it. Since 34 = 81 and 43 = 64, clearly P (4) holds. (d) The induction step is to show that P (k) => P (k + 1) (for any k ≥ n 0 ). Spell this out.

3 k^ ≥ k^3 ⇒ 3 k+1^ ≥ (k + 1)^3 for any k ≥ 4

i. The Induction Hypothesis is P (k). Write it out.

P (k) : 3k^ ≥ k^3

ii. Write out the goal: P (k + 1).

P (k + 1) : 3k+1^ ≥ (k + 1)^3

iii. Rewrite the LHS of P (k + 1) until you can relate it to the LHS of P (k). 3 k+1^ = 3k^3 ˙ ≥ 3 k˙^3 iv. Rewrite the RHS of P (k + 1) until you can relate it to the RHS of P (k).

(k + 1)^3 = k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1.

Want to show that this is less or equal to 3 k˙^3 v. The induction hypothesis gives you the inequality between certain ”chunks” of the RHS and LHS of P (k+1). It remains to compare the remaining parts and show that the inequality holds between those too. Can you think of a way? Use the back of the page to write a clear, correct, succinct proof of the statement.

——Try to figure this out for Wednesday————

  1. Prove that 7 divides 2 n+2^ + 3^2 n+1^ for any non-negative integer n.

Scratch work:

(a) What is the predicate P(n) that we aim to prove for all n ≥ n 0?

P (n) : 7 divides 2 n+2^ + 3^2 n+

(b) What is n 0 =? = 0 (c) So the base case consists of proving P (n 0 ). Write out what this means, specifically for this problem.

P (0) : 7 divides 2 0+2^ + 32(0)+

Now verify it. Since 2 0+2^ + 32(0)+1^ = 2^2 + 3 = 7, certainly 7 divides it. (d) The induction step is to show that P (k) => P (k + 1) (for any k ≥ n 0 ). Spell this out.

If 7 divides 2 k+2^ + 3^2 k+1^ for some k ≥ 0 , then it must also divide 2 k+3^ + 3^2 k+

i. The Induction Hypothesis is P (k). Write it out. P (k) : 2k+2^ + 3^2 k+1^ = 7a for some integer a

ii. Write out the goal: P (k + 1). P (k + 1) : 2k+3^ + 3^2 k+3^ = 7b for some integer b

iii. Rewrite the LHS of P (k + 1) until you can relate it to the LHS of P (k).

2 k+3+3^2 k+3^ = 2k+22+3^2 k+19 = 2k+22+3^2 k+1(2+7) = 2(2k+2+3^2 k+1)+3^2 k+1 7.

iv. Prove the induction step entirely.

By induction hypothesis, 2 k+2^ + 3^2 k+1^ = 7a, so 2 k+3^ + 3^2 k+3^ = 2(7a) + 3^2 k+17 = 7(2a + 3k+1).

Use the back of the page to write a clear, correct, succint proof of the statement.