TERM 1
PSYCH 660 Week 1 Individual Assignment
Ethics Awareness Inventory Paper (2 Set)
Updated
DEFINITION 1
PSYCH 660 Week 1 Individual Assignm ent Ethics Awareness Inventory
Paper (2 Set) NEWCompletethe Ethi cs Awareness Inventory
Tutorial.Writea 1,050- to 1,250-word sum mary of your findings. Address
the following:Explain the importance of und erstanding your personal
ethical perspective. Analyze the relationship betw een personal and
professional ethics in psychology. Discuss how the A PA decision-making
process facilitates more ethical professio nal behavior. Describe how
your Ethical Awareness Anventory scor es relate to the concept of
aspirational and enforceable standard s. Use course materials and/or
additional peer reviewed journal articl es to support your paper. Make
sure to properly document your resour ces, including the Ethical
Awareness Inventory. Include about the inventory r esults as part of your
paper, in particular to respond to the f ourth bullet point in the
Instructions. You may use the first per son point of view in responding to
the fourth bullet point only. Formatyour paper consistent with APA
guidelines
TERM 2
PSYCH 660 Week 2 Individual Assignment
Case Study One Worksheet (2 Set) Updated
DEFINITION 2
PSYCH 660 Week 2 Individual Assignm ent Case Study One Worksheet (2
Set) NEWCase Study One Wor ksheetRespond to the following questions
in 1,250 to 1,500 words.Why is this an ethical dilem ma? Which APA
Ethical Principles help frame the natu re of the dilemma?How might Dr.
Romaros ambivalence toward the deat h penalty influence his decision to
offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability? How might Johns
confession or his comment about the b oy waiting for the bus influence
the decision? To what extent should th ese factors play a role in Dr.
Romaros report?How are APA Ethical Standards 2.0f, 3.06, 4.04, 4.05,
5.01, 9.01a and 9.06 relevant to this cas e? Which other standards might
apply?What steps should Dr. Romaro tak e to ethically implement his
decision and monitor its effect?
TERM 3
PSYCH 660 Week 2 Learning Team
Assignment Ethical Decision Making Debate
(2 Set) Updated
DEFINITION 3
PSYCH 660 Week 2 Learning Team Ass ignment Ethical Decision Making
Debate (2 Set) NEWSelectan et hical dilemma related to professional
competence.Developaa 1,250- to 1500 Wo rd Paper(not counting title
and reference slide) with detailed spea ker notes based on your selected
dilemma.Addressthe following items :Describe your selected eth ical
dilemma and why it is a dilemma.Provi de an argument for two methods
of resolving the issue and justify the et hical resolution process you
would take under each method.Provid e an argument for why each
method should be used.Includea reference sl ide with a minimum of 3
scholarly sources.Scholarly sources are journal articles or books. The
textbook can count as one scholarly sou rce. Websites will only be
considered supplemental sources and will not be included as a part of
the minimum of 3 scholarly sources.Clickth e Assignment Files tab to
submit your assignment.
TERM 4
PSYCH 660 Week 3 Individual Assignment
Article Analysis Presentation (2 PPT) Updated
DEFINITION 4
PSYCH 660 Week 3 Individual Assignm ent Article Analysis Presentation
(2 PPT) NEWDevelopa 10- to 12-slide MicrosoftPowerPointpresentati on
(not counting the title and reference s lides) with detailed speaker notes
based on your selected article. Include the following:A properly
formatted title pageAn agenda for your prese ntationAn outline of the
purpose or focus of the articleAn evalu ation of the ethical issues
presented in the articleAn ex planation of the conclusions drawn by th e
article and their implications for the cl inical practice of psychologyAn
analysis of the implications of the ethica l issues presented in the article
to the practice of psychologyA properly formatted reference
slideFormatyour presentation consisten t with APA guidelines.Clickthe
Assignment Files tab to submit your as signment.
TERM 5
PSYCH 660 Week 4 Case Study Two
Worksheet (2 WorkSheet) Updated
DEFINITION 5
PSYCH 660 Week 4 Case Study Two Wo rksheetRespond to the following
questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words.1. Why is this an ethical dilemma?
Which APA Ethical Principles help fram e the nature of the dilemma?2.
How might Irinas age and parents inv olvement in the referral affect how
Dr. Matthews can resolve the dilemma ? How might the state law on
treatment of minors and HIPAA rule on access of guardians to a minors
health care record influence Dr. Matth ews decision?3. How are APA
Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and
10.10a relevant to this case? Which oth er standards might apply?4.
What are Dr. Matthews ethical altern atives for resolving this dilemma?
Which alternative best reflects the Eth ics Code aspirational principle
and enforceable standard, as well as le gal standards and Dr. Matthews
obligations to stakeholders?5. What ste ps should Dr. Matthews take to
ethically implement her decision and m onitor its effects?
