Quizzes/Activity/Studies, Study notes of Data Structures and Algorithms

Enjoy goodluck fighting laban lang

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 11/01/2022

CebeeLopez
CebeeLopez 🇵🇭

1 document

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
SCRIPT
GOODAFTERNOON MAAM AND CLASSMATE
WE ARE HERE TODAY TO DISCUSS ABOUT A VERY CONTROVERTIAL ISSUE IN OUR PHILIPPINE HISTORY
WHICH IS ALL ABOUT THE RETRACTION OF JOSE RIZAL, AS WE ALL KNOW JOSE RIZAL IS OUR
NATIONAL HERO BECAME ONE OF THE SIGNIFICANT PERSONALITIES IN OUR HISTORY THAT MADE A
BIG CONTRIBUTION ESPECIALLY IN THE FOURTH COMING PHILIPPINE REVULOTION AT THAT TIME.
Jose protasio rizal Mercado Alonso realonda
1861-1896
National Hero of the Philippines
Because of his writings about ending colonialism and freeing Filipino minds to contribute to
the creation of the Philippines, Jose Rizal is regarded as a hero of the revolution.
Rizal’s Death: December 30, 1896
JOSE RIZAL AS THE SYMBOL OF A FILIPINO NATIONALISM AND SACRIFICE LEFT A BIG CONTROVERTIAL
ISSUE WITH REGARDS TO THE EVENTS BEFORE HIS DEATH OFCOURSE TO THIS ABOUT THE
RETRACTION JOSE RIZAL.
What is retraction?
A public statement made about an earlier statement that withdraws, cancel, refutes, or
reverses the original statement or ceases and desists from publishing the original statement.
SO ANO NGA BAYUNG RETRACTION?
PAGSINABI NATING RETRACTION ITO YUNG PAG BAWI, PAGHINGI NG TAWAD AT PAG HINGI NG
PERMISYO SA SIMBAHAN KATOLIKO NA NAMATAY SYA BILANG ISANG KATOLIKO SO AYUN NGA
PAGDATING NUNG ARAW NUNG KANYANG KAMATAYAN MARAMI NAIWAN NA TANONG DON KAY
JOSE RIZAL PARTIKULAR WITH HIS RETRACTION SO NOW, ANO BAYUNG LUMALABAS DITU SA ISSUE
NATO? MERON DALAWNG SIDE OFCOURSE UNANG UNA YUNG MGA NANINIWALA NA SI JOSE RIZAL
DAW AY TALAGANG NAG KAROON NG TINATAWAG NATIN RETRACTION AND ON THE OTHER HAND
MAY MGA NAGSASABI DAW NA THIS IS JUST ALL A PART OF THE FABRICATION OS THE SPANISH
FRAYARS TO UNDERMINE THE EFFORTS OF JOSE RIZAL OUR NATIONAL HERO
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Quizzes/Activity/Studies and more Study notes Data Structures and Algorithms in PDF only on Docsity!

SCRIPT

GOODAFTERNOON MAAM AND CLASSMATE

WE ARE HERE TODAY TO DISCUSS ABOUT A VERY CONTROVERTIAL ISSUE IN OUR PHILIPPINE HISTORY

WHICH IS ALL ABOUT THE RETRACTION OF JOSE RIZAL, AS WE ALL KNOW JOSE RIZAL IS OUR

NATIONAL HERO BECAME ONE OF THE SIGNIFICANT PERSONALITIES IN OUR HISTORY THAT MADE A

BIG CONTRIBUTION ESPECIALLY IN THE FOURTH COMING PHILIPPINE REVULOTION AT THAT TIME.

Jose protasio rizal Mercado Alonso realonda 1861-

  • National Hero of the Philippines
  • Because of his writings about ending colonialism and freeing Filipino minds to contribute to the creation of the Philippines, Jose Rizal is regarded as a hero of the revolution.
  • Rizal’s Death: December 30, 1896 JOSE RIZAL AS THE SYMBOL OF A FILIPINO NATIONALISM AND SACRIFICE LEFT A BIG CONTROVERTIAL ISSUE WITH REGARDS TO THE EVENTS BEFORE HIS DEATH OFCOURSE TO THIS ABOUT THE RETRACTION JOSE RIZAL. What is retraction?
  • A public statement made about an earlier statement that withdraws, cancel, refutes, or reverses the original statement or ceases and desists from publishing the original statement. SO ANO NGA BAYUNG RETRACTION? PAGSINABI NATING RETRACTION ITO YUNG PAG BAWI, PAGHINGI NG TAWAD AT PAG HINGI NG PERMISYO SA SIMBAHAN KATOLIKO NA NAMATAY SYA BILANG ISANG KATOLIKO SO AYUN NGA PAGDATING NUNG ARAW NUNG KANYANG KAMATAYAN MARAMI NAIWAN NA TANONG DON KAY JOSE RIZAL PARTIKULAR WITH HIS RETRACTION SO NOW, ANO BAYUNG LUMALABAS DITU SA ISSUE NATO? MERON DALAWNG SIDE OFCOURSE UNANG UNA YUNG MGA NANINIWALA NA SI JOSE RIZAL DAW AY TALAGANG NAG KAROON NG TINATAWAG NATIN RETRACTION AND ON THE OTHER HAND MAY MGA NAGSASABI DAW NA THIS IS JUST ALL A PART OF THE FABRICATION OS THE SPANISH FRAYARS TO UNDERMINE THE EFFORTS OF JOSE RIZAL OUR NATIONAL HERO

SA NGAYUN ANO BAYUNG MGA MAHALAGANG DETAYLE DAPAT NATING TIGNAN DOON SA

RETRACTION?

SO KUNG TOTOO MAN NA MERON RETRACTION, UNANG UNA SINASABI DITU NA BAGO MAMATAY SI

JOSE RIZAL KINUMBINSI SYA NG MGA DUMADALAW NA PARI SA KANYA UPANG GUMAWA NG

RETRAKSYON SO NGAYUN ANO ANG KAPALIT NANG RETAKSYON NA GINAWA DAW NI JOSE RIZAL

JOSEPHINE BRACKEN

  • The common-law wife of Philippine national hero José Rizal
  • Marie Josephine Leopoldine Bracken was the common-law wife of Philippine nationalist José Rizal during his exile in Dapitan in the province of Zamboanga del Norte in the southern Philippines. JOSE RIZAL & JOSEPHINE BRACKEN Father Balaguer testified he married Rizal and Josephine on December 30 at 6:00 in the morning. After his marriage, Rizal dedicated a Catholic devotion book, De la Imitacion de Cristo, to josephine”. The dedication read as follows: “to my dear and unhappy wife Josephine (Garcia, 1964) UNANG UNA PINAYAGAN SI JOSE RIZAL NA MAKASAL KAY JOSEPHINE BRACKEN ISA YUN SA MGA GUSTONG SANA GAWIN NI JOSE RIZAL NA SYAY NA SA DAPITAN PA BUT OF COURSE IT WAS…. : NEVER MATERIALIZED SO JOSE RIZAL DECIDED TO MARRY JOSEPHINE BRACKEN ON A MADE UP NA CEREMONY NA GINAWA NILA DOON SAKANYANG DAPITAN T ISA PA BILANG PART NUNG KANYANG RETRACTION SI JOSE RIZAL WAS ABLE TO DIE AS A CATHOLIC SO NAPAYAGAN SI JOSE RIZAL NA MAMATAY BILANG ISA KATOLIK SO AYUN ANG MGA NANDOON SA PART NG RETRACTION DAW SO NGAYUN SINASABI DAW NA GINAWA DAW YUN NI JOSE RIZAL ANG RETRACTION UPANG MAGKAROON NG PAGKAKATAON SI JOSE RIZAL NA MAGAWA YUNG KANYANG HULING MGA KAHILINGAN BILANG ISANG ASAWA KAY JOSEPHINE BRACKEN, NOLI ME TANGERE AND EL FILIBUSTERISMO This was the goal of much of Rizal's writing, especially his most important works like Nole Mi Tangere and El Filibusterismo. His essays denigrate friars, the primary perpetrators of injustice in Philippine society, rather than the Catholic faith. PRIMARY SOURCE: RIZAL’S RETRACTION “I declare myself a Catholic and in this Religion in which I was born and educated I wish to live and die. “I retract with all my heart whatever in my words, writing, publications and conduct has been contrary to my character as son of the Catholic Church. I believe and I confess whatever she teaches and I submit to whatever she demands. I abominate Masonry, as the enemy which is of the Church, and as a Society prohibited by the Church. The Diocesan Prelate may, as a the Superior Ecclesiastical Authority, make public this spontaneous manifestation of mine in order to repair the scandal which my acts may have caused and so that God and people may pardon me.” Manila 28 of December of 1896 Jose Rizal

PRO RETRACTIONS ( E. )

E. Fr. Manuel A. Garcia: best evidence. In Fr. Manuel A. Garcia’s (an archdiocesan archivist way back in 1935) account of events, he came across a bundle of document entitled “Masoneria” In this bundle, he came across the document of retraction which had been long lost. Archbishop O’Doherty, despite the approval of Teodoro Kalaw (the Director of the National Library), was not satisfied with the mere document itself so he requested Prof. H. Otlet Beyer(Professor of Anthropology) in the University of the Philippines to study and examine the Rizal retraction document. He examined Rizal’s supposed handwriting in the document of retraction and compared it with 150 letters and documents that were written in Rizal’s handwriting. There is not slightest doubt that every word on the document of retraction was written by Jose Rizal, except for the signatures of the others witnesses. The whole document was found to be written by Rizal in his normal handwriting. dr. jose i. del rosario also compared this piece of document with numerous letters of dr. jose rizal. Dr jose i. del rosario did not find anything in rizal’s retraction which does not proclaim that the retraction is in fact. He points out the most silient individual characteristic points of identify between the handwriting of the retraction and the undisputed handwriting of rizal. There are two (2) major arguments that support Rizal's Retraction. These are:

  1. The Retraction “Document” found in 1935 was considered imperative evidence to the Retraction, itself; and
  2. There were eyewitnesses closely associated with the events. According to Ricardo P. Garcia’s “The Great Debate: The Rizal’s Retraction”, there were two (2) great testimonies of eyewitnesses who were privy to what happened in Rizal’s cell from early morning of December 29 to 6:30 am of December 30. They are:
  3. Fr. Vicente Balaguer. According to the priest's testimonies, the reasonable Rizal had several rude awakenings; confessed, celebrated mass, had Communion, and prayed the Rosary four (4) times.
  4. Former Lieutenant of the Infantry, Mariano Martinez Gallegos. He confirmed that Rizal himself signed a document called a retraction along with key eyewitnesses Juan del Fresno and Eloy Moure. Both named eyewitnesses confirmed Gallegos' statements. SO ANO DAW YUNG MGA IBEDENSYA TUNGKOL SA RETRACTION? OFCOURSE NANDYAN YUNG TESTIMENTO NG MGA PARI NANAG SASABI NA NAGKAROON NG RETRACTION SI JOSE RIZAL, PANGALAWA NAMAN MERONG ISANG LUMABAS NA SULAT NUNG SAAN ANDOON ANG MISMONG RETRACTION NI JOSE RIZAL SO NGAYUN NAMAN SA KABILANG BANDA MARAMI DIN NAGSASABI NA GAWA GAWA LAMANG ANG RETRACTION NI JOSE RIZAL.

BAKIT NGA DAW BA GAWA GAWA LANG YUN RETRACTION?

THE MAIN REASONS IS OFCOURSE THEY WANTED TO PUNISHED THE REPUTATION OF JOSE RIZAL AS A

HERO AND OFCOURSE AS SOMEONE WHO CONTRIBUTED A LOT IN THE PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENCE

AND SYEMPRE MARAMING RIN MGA AYAW KAY JOSE RIZAL DAHIL UNANG UNA NGA JOSE RIZAL

WROTE A LOT OF THINGS AGAINST THE PEOPLE IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH DURING HIS TIME AND

THEN I THINK MANY PEOPLE OR MANY RELIGOUS PERSONALITIES DIDN’T LIKE SA MGA GINAWA NI

JOSE RIZAL NGAYUN SO AHHH GINAWA NILA YUN FINALLY PARA YUN RETRACTION PARA MASABI NA

THEY WERE ABLE TO DEFEAT JOSE RIZAL OR JOSE RIZAL SURRENDERED TO THEM BEFORE HE DIED

PARANG GANUN.

YUNG RETRACTION KUNG TITIGNAN NATIN DOON SA MGA HINDI NANINIWALA SA RETRACTION ITS

MORE LIKE A WAY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH YUNG MGA HINDI NAKA SUNDO NI JOSE RIZAL DOON

AS A WAY OF SAYING THAT IN THE END THEY ARE TRY A PAMP OVER JOSE RIZAL AND JOSE RIZAL WAS

DEFEATED BECAUSE HE STILL CHOOSE TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS FROM THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

To further cement the arguments, new documents were released with new interpretations. These are: The Cuerpo de Vigilencia Translation of the Transcript: “At 7:50 yesterday morning, Jose Rizal entered death row accompanied by his counsel,Señor Tavielde Andrade, and the Jesuit priestVilaclara. At the urgings of the former and moments after entering, he was served a light breakfast. At approximately 9, the Assistant of the Plaza,Señor Maure, asked Rizal if he wanted anything. He replied that at the moment he only wanted a prayer book which was brought to him shortly by Father March. “SeñorAndrade left death row at 10 and Rizal spoke for a long while with the Jesuit fathers, March andVilaclara, regarding religious matters, it seems. It appears that these two presented him with a prepared retraction on his life and deeds that he refused to sign. They argued about the matter until 12:30 when Rizal ate some poached egg and a little chicken. Afterwards he asked to leave to write and wrote for a long time by himself. “At 3 in the afternoon, Father March entered the chapel and Rizal handed him what he had written. Immediately the chief of the firing squad,Señordel Fresno and the Assistant of the Plaza,Señor Maure, were informed. They entered death row and together with Rizal signed the document that the accused had written. It seems this was the retraction.” Rizal's short writing in Josephine Bracken's copy of, " De la Imitacion de Cristo (The Imitations of Christ)"; and Rizal's frequent mentions of "cross" in his final writings. Rizal Died Defiant Arguments that counter the Pro-Retraction have been proposed by some historians due to some loopholes that the pro-Retraction has failed to overlook. These are:

  1. The Retraction letter itself is not authentic according to some historians;
    1. Josephine Bracken herself remains unmarried; and
  2. The aftermath of the pro-Retraction's arguments point to a different direction.