



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This course is introduction to Physics. Its includes: acceleration, angular momentum, ballistic motion, center of mass, circular of orbits, Newton laws, drag force, velocity, conservation law of energy, superposition, circular motion, time dilation, work and energy. This assignment includes: Relavite, Velocity, Differential, Form, Lorentz, Transformation, Frame, Moving, Particle, Energy, Collision, Incident
Typology: Exercises
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Write differential form of Lorentz transformation:
x�^ = γ(x − ut)
t � = γ(t − ux/c 2 )
γ = � 1 − u^2 /c^2
which is:
dx�^ = γ(dx − udt) (1)
dt � = γ(dt − udx/c 2 ) (2)
Divide (2) by (1) you’ll get (dx/dt = vx):
v � =
vx − u x 1 − uvx/c^2
Where u is the velocity of the moving frame. In this problem you
want to know the relative velocity so it means that your moving
frame has the velocity of one of them and in this frame you want to
know velocity of the other:
vx = 0. 9520 c
u = − 0. 9520 c
Replace this into equation (3) you’ll get:
v � =
v (^) rel = 0. 9988 c
1
� �
E = mγc 2
Where m is the rest mass and
1 γ = (4) (^2) /c 2
1 − u
Before collision - incident two protons -:
� E = EP + EP = 2 mP γP c 2
After collision - two protons + new particle which are at rest -:
� E � = EP + EP + Eη � 0 = (2mP + mη^0 )c 2
From the energy conservation:
� E =
�
we get:
2 mP + mη 0 γ (^) P = 2 mP
With the numbers given:
γ (^) P= 1. 29
From (4):
� 1 u/c = 1 − γ^2
2
The reason there is an apparent paradox is that the notion of fitting
the moving pole into the barn contains an implicit assumption that
the length of the pole (or the barn) is not changed by their motion.
Actually the length of a moving object contains the idea of simul
taneity - it is the distance between the ends at the same instant of
time. Simultaneity is destroyed by special relativity - two people
who have a relative velocity will not agree on what is simultaneous!
Hence they can (and do) disagree about the relative size of pole and
barn.
This paradox is often sharpened by imagining that the doors of the
barn are suddenly and simultaneously closed by the farmer. Seeing
the door closing, the runner stops. Then does his pole fit? This
introduces an extraneous element into the problem: when the runner
stops, only the middle of the pole where he is holding it stops - so
when do the ends stop? In reality the pole will break. But if the
ends magically stopped simultaneously in the frame of the runner,
the farmer would see the rear end of the pole stop while the front end
kept going. When the pole, which to the farmer appeared shorter
than the barn while moving, stops in this manner, it will be longer
than the barn. This confirms the original opinion of the runner (who
thought the barn much shorter than his pole), but only because the
ends stopped simultaneously in the frame of the runner.
4
From the relativistic addition of velocities discussed in the book and
derived here (problem 1) we can apply them here. Assume light has
velocity c/n in the direction of water’s velocity, V :
c
(c/n)V =^
n = (c/n+V )[1− +O(V 2 /c 2 )] = c/n+V −V /n 2 +O(V 2 /c 2 ) 1 + V^ nc c^2 nc
Therefore:
= (c/n)^ +^ (1^ −^1 /n
2 v ∼ )V
Where we threw out O(V 2 /c^2 ) assuming it’s very small. This is the
same as the given formulae with
k = 1 − n^2
With the n=1.333 you’ll get:
k = 0. 4372
which is incredibly close to the experimental value.
5