Research Methodology report guidelines, Lecture notes of Research Methodology

Research Methodology report guidelines

Typology: Lecture notes

2020/2021

Uploaded on 11/03/2021

nur-adila
nur-adila 🇲🇾

2

(2)

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
RUBRICS
RESEARCH PROPOSAL (20%)
COURSE NAME : RESEARCH METHODS
COURSE CODE : MGT648
PROGRAM : BA2435A
GROUP : _CRITICAL THINKING BY GENDER____
STUDENT’S NAME : NURZATUL IYLIA MOHD NAZRI
JAMIRAH MOHD RAFIE
ABDULLAH FAISAL HILLALUDDIN
MUHAMMAD IKHWAN SADIQIN BIN IDRIS
NURAIN ANNISA MAZLAN
LECTURER’S NAME : DR ROHANI MOHD
CRITERIA
MARKS
ALLOCA
TED
EXCELLENT
4
COMPETENT
3
NEED IMPROVEMENT
2
INCOMPLETE
1
WEIGHTED
MARKS
OBTAINED
Introduction
and
background
of the study
4
An interesting
introduction based on
facts leads clearly into
the research proposal
A fairly well formulated
introduction with some
evidence to support the
topic leads into the research
proposal
Introduction is not well
constructed, uninteresting, or
does not lead into the research
proposal
Lacks a proper introduction
3/4 X 4=3
Problem
statement
4
Stated the research
problem clearly, and
Fairly well posed statement
of the problem that provide
Statement of the problem is not
clearly stated and/or lacks
Lacks a proper statement
of the problem.
2.8/4 X 4=2.8
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Research Methodology report guidelines and more Lecture notes Research Methodology in PDF only on Docsity!

RUBRICS

RESEARCH PROPOSAL ( 20 %)

COURSE NAME : RESEARCH METHODS

COURSE CODE : MGT

PROGRAM : BA2435A

GROUP : _CRITICAL THINKING BY GENDER____

STUDENT’S NAME : NURZATUL IYLIA MOHD NAZRI

JAMIRAH MOHD RAFIE

ABDULLAH FAISAL HILLALUDDIN

MUHAMMAD IKHWAN SADIQIN BIN IDRIS

NURAIN ANNISA MAZLAN

LECTURER’S NAME : DR ROHANI MOHD

CRITERIA MARKS

ALLOCA

TED

EXCELLENT

COMPETENT

NEED IMPROVEMENT

INCOMPLETE

WEIGHTED

MARKS

OBTAINED

Introduction and background of the study

An interesting introduction based on facts leads clearly into the research proposal A fairly well formulated introduction with some evidence to support the topic leads into the research proposal Introduction is not well constructed, uninteresting, or does not lead into the research proposal Lacks a proper introduction 3 /4 X 4 = 3 Problem statement^4 Stated the research problem clearly, and Fairly well posed statement of the problem that provide Statement of the problem is not clearly stated and/or lacks Lacks a proper statement of the problem.

2. 8 /4 X 4 = 2. 8

FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, MALAYSIA

provide motivation for undertaking the research evidence but the evidence is not as strong as it could be quality evidence to support the problem Evidence presented does not support the thesis or problem statement Purpose of study (^) 2 Very clearly stated purpose of the study and demonstrated its potential value Fairly well stated purpose of the study but did not demonstrate its potential value Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or the value is not stated Lacks of purpose of the study statement

4 /4 X 2 = 2

Literature Review (LR) 4 Demonstrated basic knowledge of literature in the area. A clear discussion on the concept of a variable and the comparison of findings from previous researches were provided Demonstrated basic knowledge of literature or previous research in the area but provided a little discussion on concept with few comparison of previous researches on research issue Unclearly mentioned some previous work in the area or the review was mainly on the definitions of a variable. Did not mention any previous research literature or provided few definitions of a variable

3 /4 X 4 = 3

Research Methods 4 Provides accurate, thorough description of how the data was collected, what/how many data sources were analyzed, plan of analysis or measurement instrument, research context Description of how the data was collected, what/how data sources were analyzed, plan of analysis or measurement instrument, research context is adequate but limited Description of how the data was collected, what/how many data sources were analyzed, plan of analysis or measurement, research context is somewhat confusing/not clearly articulated Description of how the data was collected, what/how many data sources were analyzed, plan of analysis or measurement instrument, research context is very confusing/not articulated sufficiently

3 /4 X 4 = 3

References 2 References were given for more than 5 relevant scholarly sources. Appropriate APA citation style was used. References are given for 5 relevant sources. Appropriate APA citation style was used. References were given for more than 3 relevant sources. Appropriate APA citation styles was used No reference is provided. Or they were not cited correctly

3 /4 X 2 = 1.

TOTAL 20 1 5.3/ 20