












Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A guide to risk management in project delivery. It covers the roles and responsibilities of team members, the risk management process, and provides a risk assessment worksheet. The guide emphasizes the importance of communication and collaboration in managing risks and provides a flowchart to help visualize the process. useful for students studying project management, risk management, or business management.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 20
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!













Risk Management Guide 1
Every day, NCDOT and consultant project staff inherently identify risks as part of their daily routine of working on or managing projects. Risks are defined as uncertainties that, if they occur, would be an obstacle or opportunity in meeting the project objectives. Throughout the planning, design, construction, and maintenance processes, many project staff, Project Managers, and discipline experts handle uncertainties, often in a “fire-fighting” manner. However, early identification and continuous management of risks reduces negative impacts, promotes timely decision making, and improves our success in meeting project objectives and delivering what we promised.
Risk management is an NCDOT best practice required for all projects and business units. This guide focuses on managing risks throughout the preconstruction phase of project delivery, specifically Stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Project Development Network (PDN). This guide describes what Risk Management is, defines the roles and responsibilities and provides a consistent, scalable process to manage risk.
Risk Management is a proactive process designed to minimize potential obstacles that may negatively impact a project’s objectives (scope, schedule, budget, quality, and commitments) and maximize the ability to capitalize on opportunities that may improve project delivery. It’s not a one-size-fits-all process and should be scaled to meet the needs of the project. The Division of Planning & Programming (Feasibility Studies and Corridor Development Units) and Project Managers are responsible for coordinating with their team members, discipline units, Division Engineers, consultants, and the appropriate project Stakeholders to develop and manage their project risks. How well project teams plan for and respond to uncertainties can significantly impact the successful delivery of the project.
Managing risks focuses on communicating with the project team early and often to:
Risks are initially identified during the Project Initiation Stage (PDN Stage 1), after the project is programmed in the STIP. During this stage, the Project Scoping Report identifies and assesses risks in the Project Initiation Form and in the Screening Checklist, respectively. When a project transitions into the Alignment Defined Stage (PDN Stage 2), these forms should be used to begin developing the Risk Assessment Worksheet (RAW), a tool for the Project Manager to use throughout Stages 2, 3 and 4 to document and manage project uncertainties. The RAW is developed right after Notice to Proceed (NTP), during the Alignment Defined Stage and is refined during the Plan-In Hand Stage (PDN Stage 3) and the PS&E Stage (PDN Stage 4). Risks evolve as the project evolves; therefore, it is essential that risks are continuously identified, evaluated, communicated among team members, monitored, managed, and refined as the project advances through these phases. The RAW can continue to be refined as the project moves through Construction and Maintenance; however, this document focuses on the activities that occur during Preconstruction.
Risks are “the effects of uncertainty on objectives”
Risk Management is the art of managing uncertainties.
Risk Management Guide 2
Many individuals are involved in the delivery of a project. Strong teamwork, communication and collaboration throughout the process creates transparency allowing team members to have a mutual understanding of the project objectives, awareness of the efforts of other team members, and coordination on how they can collectively work together to meet those objectives. This improves decision making and allows the team to react quickly to uncertainties when they are realized. The chart below describes the various risk management roles and responsibilities across the life of a project.
Risk Management
Roles^1 and Responsibilities
Responsible, Consulted, Informed
Value Management ProgramManager
Project Initiation
Alignment Defined, Plan-In Hand, PS&E
Division Project Delivery /Development Engineer
3
Division of Planning &Programming Planning Team Members
2
Division Project Delivery /Development Engineer
3
Project Manager Project Team Members Risk Owner
4
Initial Risk Identification & Assessment
Provide expectations and assumptions to project objectives C R I
Identify project risks in Project Initiation Form I R C
Assess risks in Screening Checklist I R
Develop RAW Provide expectations and assumptions to project objectives C R I
Place RAW on the Preconstruction SharePoint site I R Review risks in the Project Scoping Report (PSR), develop all sections in the Risk Assessment Worksheet (RAW) and identify any additional risks R^ C Notify VMO when initial RAW is developed I R
The biggest risk is the failure to communicate.
Risk Management Guide 4
NCDOT requires all staff to proactively manage risks for all projects programmed in the STIP, regardless of project size; however, this process is scalable to fit the need of the project. Going through the risk management process is a collaborative team effort, which can take very little time or can require extensive coordination with multiple discipline units, Divisions, Chief’s Office, or Secretary’s Office. Risk management requires the Division of Planning & Programming and the Project Manager to lead teams and seek input from the appropriate stakeholders throughout all stages of the project.
4.1. Project Initiation Stage (Stage 1)
4.1.1. Purpose The purpose of risk management in the Project Initiation Stage is to identify potential uncertainties that may impact the project scope, schedule, budget, quality or commitments because projects that experience major changes in these areas later, may be required to go through reprioritization.
4.1.2. Perform the Initial Risk Identification and Assessment in PSR During the Project Initiation Stage (PDN Stage 1), after the project is programmed in the STIP, the Division of Planning & Programming and Planning Team Members are responsible for identifying risks in the Project Initiation Form and assessing risks in the Screening Checklist (forms are available on the Scoping Connect Site).
Project Initiation Form The Project Initiation Form has a Risk Section intended to provide a high-level overview of what risks exist at this stage of the project. The individual or team identifying risks at this stage, indicate which risks or potential uncertainties exists on the project by checking the associated boxes in this section of the form and adding any additional risks that may not be included on this form. If a certain risk does not exist for the project, then it remains unchecked.
Risk Management Guide 5
Screening Checklist The Risk Section in the Screening Checklist lists possible risks on a project and focuses on assessing the impact of the risks identified in the Project Initiation Form. The individual or team assessing the risks is expected to identify the potential impact associated with the risks identified on the Project Initiation Form. If a risk does not apply to a particular project, N/A can be placed in the comments section of the risk to indicate this.
Both forms are part of an existing process and are included in the Project Scoping Report (PSR). The Value Management Office (VMO) will automatically be notified when a PSR is completed so they can evaluate the project’s level of risk exposure and determine if the project would benefit from having a formal Risk Assessment Study in a future stage. Guidance on formal Risk Assessment Studies is being developed and this document will be updated when that is available. For these projects, the VMO will coordinate with the Project Manager to determine when a formal Risk Assessment Study is appropriate.
4.2. Alignment Defined, Plan-In Hand, PS&E Stages (Stages 2, 3 & 4)
4.2.1. Purpose The purpose of risk management during the Alignment Defined (PDN Stage 2), Plan-In Hand (PDN Stage 3) and PS&E stages (PDN Stage 4) is to proactively identify potential uncertainties that may impact the project scope, schedule, budget, or commitments to improve timely and informed decision-making and successfully deliver what we promised our stakeholders.
Risk Management Guide 7
o “if” describes the risk/uncertainty (event) and o “then” describes the potential effect or impact to the project objective (consequence)
For example: If Section 4(f) properties are involved in the project area, then delays to the project schedule may occur if potential impacts and avoidance options are not proactively and realistically identified, assessed and coordinated.
Risk Assessment Evaluate the Probability and Impact of Uncertainties : Risks are evaluated by assessing the probability of occurrence and the impact the uncertainty may have on the project objectives if the risk is realized/accepted. Assessing these helps the Project Manager prioritize risks. The Project Manager is responsible for coordinating these efforts with the Project Team.
of exposure and is based on the input for probability and impact. Uncertainties with a high score have high levels of exposure and are higher priorities to mitigate/address. The Project Manager is responsible for prioritizing risks.
Response Strategy Develop and Refine Response Strategies : The Project Team is responsible for collaborating with the Project Manager to select the appropriate response strategies, which consist of defining the approach the team will take to effectively minimize obstacles and/or enhance opportunities (avoid, mitigate, transfer, accept or enhance). The Project Team members are also responsible for developing action items, acting as the Risk Owners and collaborating with the Project Manager to identify sufficient follow-up dates for all risks. The Risk Owner is an individual whose area of expertise relates to a specific risk and is responsible for implementing action items, monitoring progress and updating the Project Manager and Project Team on the status of the risk.
Monitor and Control Develop Management and Monitoring Expectations: Frequent monitoring of project risks allows the Project Manager and Project Team to discuss risk mitigation efforts, determine if the strategy identified is effective, if modifications to the action plan need to occur, and make timely decisions. This minimizes the frequency at which risks evolve into significant issues and cause major delays or significant cost increases. This section in the worksheet consists of specifying an update frequency and an area to keep status updates. The Project Manager is responsible for collaborating with the Project Team to identify the update frequency expectations for each risk. The Risk Owner is responsible for documenting any status updates.
Monitor and Manage Risks on a Regular Basis: Effective risk monitoring is a continuous iterative process that extends throughout the life of the project. Project Teams are expected to regularly:
o Identify any new risks
Risk Management Guide 8
o Assess whether the probability or impact to the project objectives have changed (causing the risk score to change) o Allow Risk Owners to provide progress updates and discuss any obstacles encountered with implementing risk response strategies and action items These discussions can be part of a project progress meeting or separately planned risk review meetings. It is the responsibility of the entire team to maintain open communication and transparency with the Project Manager, Project Team, Management, Project Stakeholders, and (if needed) the VMO. This can improve the ability to obtain additional resources and organizational support when risks become realized or accepted.
The Project Manager is responsible for ensuring the RAW is regularly updated and for continuing the management of risks as the project evolves through Stages 2, 3 and 4 (see flowchart in Appendix B).
At letting, the Project Manager is responsible for ensuring that the latest RAW is uploaded to the Preconstruction SharePoint site and notifying the Resident Engineer. The Resident Engineer is provided with a link to the Project’s Preconstruction SharePoint site in their Construction SharePoint site and will have access to the RAW.
4.2.3. Cost Estimate Reviews (CER’s) Projects that require Federal assistance and exceed $500 million in cost, must follow the Federal Cost Estimate Review (CER) process which requires a risk-based review workshop. CER’s are typically conducted at least 90 days prior to the approval of the NEPA decision and reviewed again before the beginning of the Construction phase. The VMO is available to assist project teams through this process. Additional information regarding CER’s is available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/majorprojects/cost_estimating/index.cfm
Risk Management Guide A-
Risk Management Roles and Responsibilities Table
Role Responsibilities Value Management Program Manager
Risk Management Guide B-
: Risk Management Flowchart
Risk Management Guide C-
: Risk Assessment Worksheet (RAW)
Guidance and Link to Template
Risk Management Guide C-
Risk Assessment Worksheet (RAW) Guidance
There are four sections that make up the RAW:
Risks are identified by the following characteristics: Number: Identifier for each risk (I, 2, 3...) Risk Name: Develop a risk statement by identifying the uncertainty and the effect it has on the project objective (scope, schedule, budget, quality or project commitment). Clear and specific risk statements are essential to effectively managing risks. If risk statements are too vague, they will be hard to manage and can lead to confusion when developing and implementing response strategies. Clear and specific risk statements can be accomplished with “if/then” statements where: o “if” describes the risk/uncertainty (event) and o “then” describes the potential effect or impact to the project objective (consequence)
For example: If Section 4(f) properties are involved in the project area, then delays to the project schedule may occur if potential impacts and avoidance options are not proactively identified, assessed and coordinated.
Threat / Opp.: Indicate whether a risk is a threat to the project objectives or is an opportunity to improve the project objectives (save project costs, advance the schedule, etc.) Status: Active, Dormant, or Closed Out
Risks are assessed by the probability at which they occur and impact they will have on the project’s objective. The combination of these two is used to prioritize risks. This is identified as the “score” on the worksheet. There are 3 sections that make up the Risk Assessment: Probability Impact Score
Risk Identification
Management & Monitoring Plan Response Strategy
Risk Assessment
Link to Risk Assessment Worksheet – click here
Risk Management Guide C-
A response strategy identifies an actionable approach to mitigate the risk. There are four sections that make up the Response Strategy:
There are two sections within the Management and Monitoring Plan: Update Frequency Update & Comments
The update frequency identifies how frequently the Risk Owner should provide an update to the Project Manager (e.g., weekly, bi-monthly, monthly, quarterly, annually). The frequency will depend on the risk and may change throughout the life of the project. This is directly connected to the “follow-up date” (in the Response Strategy section)
The updates and comments section is a place for the Project Manager and/or Risk Owner to track the progress and work that has been completed to mitigate, avoid, transfer or enhance the risk. If, for example, someone asks what work has been done to mitigate a risk, someone could go to this section to provide that information. Below is an example of the updates and comments that can be provided for a risk:
Risk Management Guide C-
Risk Update & Comments
If Median Emergency Access is not provided, project costs could increase to allow for outside access.
9/15/16 - Ongoing discussion between NCDOT Discipline Leads and the Project Team as to if this type of access is allowed. 10/10/16 - No updates at this time. 11/7/16 – Peter, Paul and Mary will set up a meeting to discuss if this access occurs in other corridors. 12/5/16 - Waiting for a response from NCDOT Discipline Leads. Project Manager will reach out to NCDOT Discipline lead this week. 1/9/17 – NCDOT Discipline Leads did not approve this access and provided a list of reasons. The traffic team will develop a response to try to keep this concept in or develop a modified concept that addresses their concerns. 2/6/17 – Project traffic team assembled a response to address NCDOT Discipline Leads concerns. 3/6/17 - Reached an agreement with NCDOT Discipline Leads to not have a median access through the retaining wall. Retaining walls do not need to be gapped to provide median access. Access will come from the outside and will require some additional real estate acquisition ~$20k.