Sandwich Theorem - Calculus One - Exam, Exams of Calculus

Key points of this exam are: Sandwich Theorem, Problems, Solutions, Sandwich Theorem, Continuous, Differentiable, Exist, Functions, Having Slope, Line Passing

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 03/21/2013

sekariapuram_16star
sekariapuram_16star 🇮🇳

4.7

(35)

165 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math-106, Fall2004/ MT-1 (problems& solutions )
2
3
017032
011023
173
2lim
112
3lim
173
2
112
3
lim
54
53
54
5
53
5
=
+
=
+
=
+
=
xx
xx
xx
x
xx
x
x
x
x.
Note: We have used the following fact: =
a
xx
1
lim for any 0, >
aa .
We have
()
(
)
2
2
2
2
2
111
3
2cos
1113
2cos
x
x
x
x
xx
x
+
=
+.
()
0
1
2cos
1
22
2
2
+
x
xx
x
x, since
(
)
12cos1 2+ x.By the Sandwich Theorem,
since 0
1
lim 2=
−∞ x
x, we deduce that
(
)
0
2cos
lim 2
2
=
+
−∞ x
x
x. So
()
(
)
.0
3
0
111
3lim
2cos
lim
1113
2cos
lim
2
2
2
2
2
==
+
=
+
−∞
−∞
−∞
x
x
x
x
xx
x
x
x
x
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Sandwich Theorem - Calculus One - Exam and more Exams Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

Math-106, Fall2004/ MT-1 (problems& solutions )

lim 2

lim 3

lim

4 5

3 5

4 5

5

3 5

5

→∞

→∞

→∞

x x

x x

x x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

Note: We have used the following fact: =∞ x → ∞ (^) xa

lim for any a ∈ ℜ, a > 0.

We have

( )

( )

2

2

2

2

2

cos 2

cos 2

x x

x

x

x x

x

( ) 0

1 cos 2 1 2 2

2

2

− ≤ x

x x

x

x

, since 1 cos( 2 ) 1

2 − ≤ x + ≤ .By the Sandwich Theorem,

since 0

lim 2

x → −∞ x

, we deduce that

( ) 0

cos 2 lim 2

2

=

→ −∞ x

x

x

. So

( )

( )

lim 3

cos 2 lim

cos 2 lim

2

2

2

2

2

= =

− −

→−∞

→−∞

→−∞

x x

x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

cos

sin 1 lim 1

sin lim 1

tan lim 1

sin lim 1

tan 1

sin 1

lim

0

0

0

0

0

x x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x x

x

x x

x

x

x

x

x

Denote t x

. Then x → −∞⇒ t → 0. So, 1.

sin lim 1

sin

lim

lim sin 0

→−∞ →−∞ → t

t

x

x

x

x x x t

− − 5

1 3

1 2 5

1 3

1 2 f x 15 x 3 x 4 15 x 3 x 4

6 3

1 2 5

1 3

2 2

− − −

= ⋅ ⋅ x − ⋅ x ⋅ x + + ⋅ x − ⋅ x

6 3

1 2 5

1 2

3 2

− − −

= ⋅ x ⋅ x − ⋅ x + − ⋅ x − ⋅ x +.

lim ( ) limtan ( 1 ) tan ( 1 1 ) tan ( ) 0 0

2 2 2 2 2

1 1

→+^ →+

f x x x x

lim ( ) lim( 1 ) 1 1 0

2 2

1 1

→−^ →−

f x x x x

( ) 1 tan ( 1 1 ) tan ( ) 0 0

2 2 2 f = − = =. So f is continuous at x = 1.

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( )

( )

2 2

2

2

2

0

2 2

(^0 0) cos 2

sin 2 2 2

sin 2 lim

tan 2 lim

lim h h

h h h h h

h h

h

h h

h

f h f

h h h +

→+^ →+ →+

( ) ( ) lim( 2 ) 2

lim

lim 0

2

0 0

→−^ →− →−

h h

h h

h

f h f

h h h

So

( ) ( )

h

f h f

h

lim 0

does not exist. Hence f ′(^1 )does not exist. i.e. f is not

differentiable at x = 1.

Let u , v :Ñ → Ñ be two continuous functions that are differentiable at x ∈Ñ.

Then u^ ⋅^ v is differentiable at x^ and (^ )^ dx

dv v u dx

du u v dx

d ⋅ = ⋅ + ⋅

Proof:

( )( )

( )( ) ( )( )

h

u v x h u v x u v x dx

d

h

→ 0

lim

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

h

ux h vx h ux h vx ux h vx ux vx

h

→ 0

lim

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 

v x h

ux h ux

h

vx h vx ux h h 0

lim

( )

( ) ( ) v ( ) x dx

dux

dx

dvx = u x ⋅ + ⋅.

[ ( ) ( )]

( ) v y v y u dx

dux vx yx

dx

d ⋅ = ⇒ ⋅ ′+ ′⋅ = ′

2 v

u v v u

v

v

u u v

v

u v y y