Selecting the Right Candidate: A Guide to HR Selection Processes, Slides of Human Resource Management

Every organization have HRM department. In this course of HRM main topics are: Employee Benefits, Employee Relations, Incentive Pay, Training, Job Analysis, Legal Issues, Performance Appraisal, Recruiting, Reward Systems. Important points in these slides are: Selection, Reliability and Validity, Initial Screening, Employment Testing, Importance of Selection, Selection Process, Reliability, Validity, Consequences of Error, Initial Screening

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 08/31/2013

devvrata
devvrata 🇮🇳

4.4

(19)

85 documents

1 / 49

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Selection
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31

Partial preview of the text

Download Selecting the Right Candidate: A Guide to HR Selection Processes and more Slides Human Resource Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Selection

Selection

  • Overview
  • Reliability & validity
  • Initial screening
  • Interview
  • Employment testing
  • Other selection tools

Overview: The Selection Process

  • Determining if a match exists
    • Person-job match
    • Person-organization match
  • Multiple hurdle approach
  • Precise steps depend on organization
    • Begin with the less expensive steps
    • More expensive or more lengthy screens when applicant pool is smaller

Back to Reliability & Validity

  • Remember that under Uniform Guidelines , any selection procedure counts as a “test,” for purposes of requiring validity evidence
  • Will we ever see a perfect correlation between test scores and subsequent job behavior / performance? - No - But, tests, interviews, etc. are the best we’ve got. - Look for .50 as the gold standard of validity (lower than .20 to be avoided)
  • Another measurement issue….
    • Whatever you use needs to distinguish among individuals; if everyone gets the same score, what’s the point?

Validity

  • Does the procedure measure what it is designed to measure?
  • Called for under Uniform Guidelines , but, again, a standard psychometric concept

5055

6065

7075

8085

9095

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 50

5560

6570

7580

8590

(^10095)

0 1 2 3 4 5

Consequences of Error

Applicant Truly Qualified

Yes No

Test Results Positive^ Yes

No

Good Hire

Appropriate Reject

Bad Hire

Loss of Talent

Realistic Job Preview

  • Lets the applicant know what the job involves -- the good and the bad
  • Idea is to self-select out individuals
  • Also, employees later see this as fair treatment
  • Can be combined with recruiting / sales

Application Forms

  • Paper or electronic
  • Identifying information
  • Education
  • Past experience
  • Other skills
    • License or certification if appropriate
  • Applicant signature
    • Permission to conduct background check
    • Termination for false or misleading information
    • Have applicants complete form even if resume provided
  • Weighted Application Blank

The Screening Interview

  • Brief
  • Based on job description and resume/application
  • Purpose:
    • Making the initial cut
    • Public relations
  • New technology
    • Video
    • Telephone

Applicant Tracking Systems

  • Computerized data bases of applicant information
  • Implication for job seekers:
    • Resumes need to be in a standard format and type font
    • Some even add “key words”

Types of Interviews

  • Screening interview (already covered)
  • “Free-form” interview
  • Structured interview
  • Panel interview
  • Non-directive interview
  • Stress interview

“Free Form” Interview

  • Unplanned and unprepared
  • Not based on KSAOs required for job
  • Questions often casual:
    • “Tell me about yourself”
  • May involve interviewer “pet questions”:
    • “What is your greatest strength?”
    • “What is your greatest weakness”
  • Speculative questions:
    • “What would you like to be doing ten years from now?”
  • Quick decision made (often in first few minutes)

Structured Interviews: Why

  • Far greater validity than unstructured or free-form interviews - r =. - That is, about 19% in variance explained by interview - Equal to any other predictor (such as tests)
  • Based on relevant KSAOs and job tasks
    • Job analysis essential
    • Critical incident approach to job analysis

The Situational Interview

  • Based on behaviors, rather than traits
    • Best predictor of future behavior is past behavior
  • Harder to fake
  • Validity about.