Docsity
Docsity
Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips
Sell on Docsity
Sell on Docsity
Docsity AI
Docsity AI
Log inSign up

Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Find documents

Prepare for your exams with the study notes shared by other students like you on Docsity

Search for your university

Find the specific documents for your university's exams

Docsity AINEW

Summarize your documents, ask them questions, convert them into quizzes and concept maps

Explore questions

Clear up your doubts by reading the answers to questions asked by your fellow students

Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Share documents
download point icon20 Points

For each uploaded document

Answer questions
download point icon5 Points

For each given answer (max 1 per day)

All the ways to get free points
Get points immediately

Choose a premium plan with all the points you need

Study Opportunities

Choose your next study program

Get in touch with the best universities in the world. Search through thousands of universities and official partners

Community

Ask the community

Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts

Free resources

Our save-the-student-ebooks!

Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors

Group Project Assessment Rubric: Self and Peer Evaluation, Study notes of Structural Design and Architecture

Alagappa UniversityStructural Design and Architecture

A scoring system and assessment rubric for group projects, including self and peer assessments. The rubric evaluates various aspects of group work, such as effectiveness, independence, creativity, knowledge, determination, time management, leadership, contribution, and confidence. It also includes spaces for peers to provide supporting evidence and identify strengths and areas for development.

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/22/2012

bageshri
bageshri 🇮🇳

4.3

(24)

175 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ARCH Group, Self and Peer Assessment on Group Project
Scoring system:
5. Excellent: Present for every meeting; contributed to the highest degree; worked
very hard.
4. Good: Present at all meetings; contributed well and regularly; worked hard.
3. Fair: Present at all but one or so meetings; contributed from time to time; showed
some effort.
2. Poor: Missed two or so meetings; contributed when prompted; showed little effort.
1. Barely acceptable: Missed several meetings; present but hardly contributed;
showed very little effort.
0. Unacceptable: Was not present at all; did not contribute to effort at all; no effort
shown at all.
Group Assessment: Project Name ______________________________
1. How effectively did the group work together?
poor below average average above average well
2. What did you learn from the group you would not have learned on your own?
3. What specific, practical changes to the group would improve everyone’s learning?
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Group Project Assessment Rubric: Self and Peer Evaluation and more Study notes Structural Design and Architecture in PDF only on Docsity!

ARCH Group, Self and Peer Assessment on Group Project

Scoring system:

5. Excellent: Present for every meeting; contributed to the highest degree; worked

very hard.

4. Good: Present at all meetings; contributed well and regularly; worked hard.

3. Fair: Present at all but one or so meetings; contributed from time to time; showed

some effort.

2. Poor: Missed two or so meetings; contributed when prompted; showed little effort.

1. Barely acceptable: Missed several meetings; present but hardly contributed;

showed very little effort.

0. Unacceptable: Was not present at all; did not contribute to effort at all; no effort

shown at all.

Group Assessment: Project Name ______________________________

1. How effectively did the group work together?

poor below average average above average well

2. What did you learn from the group you would not have learned on your own?

3. What specific, practical changes to the group would improve everyone’s learning?

Self Assessment (of yourself!) – How you believe your peers will assess you.

One positive or valuable strength One positive or valuable strength

One positive or valuable strength One positive or valuable strength

  • Independence of thought and action. Your Name: ___________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence
  • Creativity in approach to problem.
  • Knowledgeable attitude.
  • Determination and effort.
  • Effective use of time.
  • Leadership.
  • Contribution to group effort.
  • Confidence in abilities.
  • Input in preparation of final report.
  • Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities.
  • Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time.
  • Participation in group meetings
  • Quality of written contribution to group effort.
  • Peer Assessment # One non-strength for development
  • Independence of thought and action. Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence
  • Creativity in approach to problem.
  • Knowledgeable attitude.
  • Determination and effort.
  • Effective use of time.
  • Leadership.
  • Contribution to group effort.
  • Confidence in abilities.
  • Input in preparation of final report.
  • Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities.
  • Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time.
  • Participation in group meetings
  • Quality of written contribution to group effort.
  • Peer Assessment #
  • Independence of thought and action. Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence
  • Creativity in approach to problem.
  • Knowledgeable attitude.
  • Determination and effort.
  • Effective use of time.
  • Leadership.
  • Contribution to group effort.
  • Confidence in abilities.
  • Input in preparation of final report.
  • Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities.
  • Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time.
  • Participation in group meetings
  • Quality of written contribution to group effort.
  • Peer Assessment # One non-strength for development
  • Independence of thought and action. Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence
  • Creativity in approach to problem.
  • Knowledgeable attitude.
  • Determination and effort.
  • Effective use of time.
  • Leadership.
  • Contribution to group effort.
  • Confidence in abilities.
  • Input in preparation of final report.
  • Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities.
  • Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time.
  • Participation in group meetings
  • Quality of written contribution to group effort.
  • Peer Assessment #
  • Independence of thought and action. Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence
  • Creativity in approach to problem.
  • Knowledgeable attitude.
  • Determination and effort.
  • Effective use of time.
  • Leadership.
  • Contribution to group effort.
  • Confidence in abilities.
  • Input in preparation of final report.
  • Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities.
  • Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time.
  • Participation in group meetings
  • Quality of written contribution to group effort.
  • Peer Assessment # One non-strength for development
  • Independence of thought and action. Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence
  • Creativity in approach to problem.
  • Knowledgeable attitude.
  • Determination and effort.
  • Effective use of time.
  • Leadership.
  • Contribution to group effort.
  • Confidence in abilities.
  • Input in preparation of final report.
  • Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities.
  • Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time.
  • Participation in group meetings
  • Quality of written contribution to group effort.

Peer Assessment

Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence

Independence of thought and action. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Creativity in approach to problem. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Knowledgeable attitude. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Determination and effort. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Effective use of time. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Leadership. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Contribution to group effort. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Confidence in abilities. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Input in preparation of final report. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Participation in group meetings 0 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of written contribution to group effort. 0 1 2 3 4 5 One positive or valuable strength One non-strength for development

Peer Assessment

Peer Name: ____________________________ Score / Supporting Evidence

Independence of thought and action. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Creativity in approach to problem. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Knowledgeable attitude. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Determination and effort. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Effective use of time. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Leadership. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Contribution to group effort. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Confidence in abilities. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Input in preparation of final report. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Completion of assigned or agreed-upon responsibilities. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Completion of assigned or agree-upon tasks on time. 0 1 2 3 4 5 Participation in group meetings 0 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of written contribution to group effort. 0 1 2 3 4 5 One positive or valuable strength One non-strength for development