semantics and pragmatics unit 3, Summaries of Formal Semantics

semantics and pragmatics summary

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 01/14/2022

wedyan-alsadi
wedyan-alsadi 🇸🇦

6 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
3 Noun vocabulary
By: Wedyan Alssadi
*Overview:
NOUN: a word used to identify any of a class of people, places, or things ( common noun ), or to name a
particular one of these ( proper noun) .
In English, nouns are words which can occur with articles and can function as the head of a noun phrase.
Nouns form a majority of the words in the vocabulary of English.
To describe the complexity of nouns we can use the has-relation.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download semantics and pragmatics unit 3 and more Summaries Formal Semantics in PDF only on Docsity!

3 Noun vocabulary

By: Wedyan Alssadi

*Overview:

  • NOUN : a word used to identify any of a class of people, places, or things ( common noun ), or to name a particular one of these ( proper noun).
  • In English, nouns are words which can occur with articles and can function as the head of a noun phrase.
  • Nouns form a majority of the words in the vocabulary of English.
  • To describe the complexity of nouns we can use the has-relation.

1. The has-relation:

  • The has-relation refers to parts that prototypical members of categories have. What is a prototype?
  • Prototypes are central members of the denotation of a word, that give the necessary information to define the category.
  • A prototype is characteristic instance. o Example: A prototype triangle has 3 sides. A prototype face has two eyes, a nose and a mouth.
  • Prototypes are clear, central members of the denotation of a word. Restricted to prototypes, the has - relation makes available entailments :
  • That figure is a triangle => ‘If that figure has three sides, then that figure is a triangle’.
  • The child drew a face => ‘If the face was prototypical, then the child drew a mouth’. 1.1. Pragmatic inferences from the has-relation:
  • The has-relation can be explained using indefinite to definite articles.
    1. I saw a thief.
    2. the thief ran away.
  • A noun phrase that first brings something into a conversation is usually indefinite (for example, marked by means of an indefinite article, a or an), but on second and subsequent mention of the same thing in the
  • A person who is standing ‘’on top’’ (deictic) of a bus is not on the top (part) of the bus. Examples of two kinds of spatial parts:
    1. Having inherent parts → people; houses; trees (top, base, sides); hills (top, base, sides); animals; pianos.
    2. Having spatial parts only deictically → balls; planets, trees (front, back); hills (front, back). 1 .3.Ends and beginnings:
  • Long thin things have ends, and sometimes two different kinds of end are distinguished: o beginnings and ends.
  • A list of some of the things that prototypically have ends is given: o ropes /roads /trains /planks
  • Nouns denoting periods of time have beginnings and ends. They also have middles.
  • Some examples are listed: o day, week, month, era, term, semester, century o conversation, demonstration, ceremony, meal, reception, process o The words in here do not denote concrete entities that you could touch or stub your toe on, but they can have beginnings, middles and ends.

2. Hyponymy

  • The meaning of a more specific word is included in that of another more general word.
  • HYPONYMY = inclusion of meaning (cat is a hyponym of animal).
  • Hyponymy is a sense relation between words (or phrases) such that the meaning (sense) of one word is included in the meaning of the other, i.e. entailment at word level.
  • The pattern of entailment that defines hyponymy is: If it’s true that there is a house, then it must be true that there is a building; it can’t be otherwise.
  • HYPONYM (from Greek hypo meaning under + onoma meaning name): The more specific term in the semantic relationship between a specific and a more general term. ❖ If B is a hyponym of A, then the meaning of B is a special case of A.
  • HYPERONYM (from Greek hyper meaning over + onoma meaning name): The general term in the semantic relationship between a general and a more specific term. o Ex: The word building, colour is a superordinate term or hyperonym of house, red, which is its hyponym.
  • If A is a hyperonym of B, then the meaning of A is more general instance of B
  • More formally, X is a hyponym of Y if X can be said to be a kind of Y; X and Y are cohyponyms if both X and Y are a kind of Z. o Ex. Rose is a kind of flower. Flower is a hyperonym , while rose is a hyponym. Obviously, tulip and lily, are all hyponyms of flower, but also of plant. We can have more than one hyponym and more hyperonyms as well, but they are in a direct or indirect relationship then, that is, there’s a hierarchy: PLANTS. FLOWERS. ROSES…
    • Other examples: Virtue: honesty, loyalty Emotion: fear, love, anger, sorrow Institutions: school, court, hospital 2 .1. Hierarchies of hyponym:
  • House is a hyponym of the superordinate building, but building is, in turn, a hyponym of the superordinate structure; and, structure is a hyponym of the superordinate thing.
  • A superordinate can itself be a hyponym at a higher level, as shown in:
  • At the bottom of the hierarchy a prototypical house has a kitchen and at least one bedroom. It also has walls and a roof (inherited from buildings), connections between the parts (inherited from structure) and a top, base, front, back and sides (inherited from thing).
  • Prototypes in the building category also have doors and floors, and prototype houses have those too, by inheritance.

3. Incompatibility

  • A semantic relation called incompatibility holds between the hyponyms of a given superordinate.
  • Hyponymy is about classification: breakfast, lunch and dinner are hyponyms of meal, their superordinate.
  • Incompatibility is about contrast: breakfast, lunch and dinner are different from each other within the category of meals because they are eaten at different times of day.
  • Incompatibility (or co-hyponymy) is the most general type of semantic relation between lexical items, the meaning of which entails exclusion.
  • A small hyponym hierarchy is shown in here.
  • There are alternative labels and different kinds of meals that could have been included (for example, supper, high tea and brunch ).
  • Incompatibility is about contrast: breakfast, lunch and dinner are different from each other within the category of meals; they are eaten at different times of day.

4. Count nouns and mass nouns

  • In the grammar of English, there is a clear distinction between count nouns, exemplified by loaf and coin and mass nouns, exemplified by bread and money.
  • Count nouns are words that indicate discrete, countable objects , whereas mass nouns are words that indicate some relatively undifferentiated substance.
  • Mass nouns resist being quantified with numbers and plural suffixes or the word many or the singular indefinite article a,
  • while count nouns can be quantified in this way.
  • Count nouns denote distinguishable whole entities, like beans or people or shirts.
  • They can be counted.
  • Mass nouns are quantified with the word much.
  • They denote undifferentiated substance, like dough or water or lava.
  • a special use allowable with some mass nouns, as when bread is taken to denote ‘distinct variety of bread’. o For example, one might say of a bakery that it produces six breads” to mean that it produces ‘six types of bread’