Separable Differential Equations: Theory and Examples, Study notes of Differential Equations

An in-depth analysis of separable differential equations, their properties, and how to solve them formally. A theorem proving the existence and uniqueness of solutions, examples, and discussions on orthogonal trajectories.

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 08/07/2012

puja
puja 🇮🇳

4.3

(8)

91 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
LECTURE 4. SEPARABLE EQUATIONS
Separable equations. Separable equations are differential equations of the form
dy f(x)
(4.1) = .
dx g(y)
For example, x + yy = 0 and y = y2 1. A separable equation (4.1) can be written in the
differential form as
(4.2) f(x)dx = g(y)dy.
Then, it can be solved formally by integrating both sides of (4.2).
We state and prove the rigorous theory of local solutions for (4.2) (and hence (4.1)).
Theorem 4.1. Let f(x) and g(x) be continuous in the rectangle R = {(x, y) : a < x < b, c < y < d}.
In addition, if f and g do not vanish simultaneously at any point of R, then (4.2) has one and only one
solution through each point (x0, y0) R. The solution is given by
x y
(4.3) f(x)dx = g(y)dy
x0 y0
It is essential that f and g do not vanish simultaneously. For example, xdx = ydy has no
solution through the origin.
Proof. Note that f(x) =0 for a < x < b or g(y) = 0 for c<y<d. Without loss of generality, we
assume g(y) > 0 for c < y < d.
Let
x y
F (x) = f(x)dx, G(x) = g(y)dy
x0 y0
so that (4.3) becomes
(4.4) F (x) = G(x).
Since G(y) = g(y) > 0 in R, by the inverse function theorem, G1 exists and (4.4) can be written
as y = G1(F (x)). That means, dy exists. Then, by differentiating (4.4), we get
dx
F (x) = G(x) dy , or f(x) = g(y) dy .
dx dx
This implies (4.2). Moreover, (4.3) gives the initial condition that y = y0 when x = x0.
To prove the uniqueness, let y be one solution of (4.2) and z be another solution with the same
initial condition. Under the hypothesis, the equation
dz = f(x)
dx g(z)
implies that dz/dx exists for any (x, z) R. Let
u = G(y), v = G(z).
Then,
du dy dy
= G(y) = g(y) = f(x).
dx dx dx
1
docsity.com
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Separable Differential Equations: Theory and Examples and more Study notes Differential Equations in PDF only on Docsity!

LECTURE 4. SEPARABLE EQUATIONS

Separable equations. Separable equations are differential equations of the form

dy f (x) (4.1) =. dx g(y)

For example, x + yy�^ = 0 and y�^ = y^2 − 1. A separable equation (4.1) can be written in the differential form as

(4.2) f (x)dx = g(y)dy.

Then, it can be solved formally by integrating both sides of (4.2). We state and prove the rigorous theory of local solutions for (4.2) (and hence (4.1)).

Theorem 4.1. Let f (x) and g(x) be continuous in the rectangle R = {(x, y) : a < x < b, c < y < d}. In addition, if f and g do not vanish simultaneously at any point of R, then (4.2) has one and only one solution through each point (x 0 , y 0 ) ∈ R. The solution is given by x y (4.3) f (x)dx = g(y)dy x 0 y 0 It is essential that f and g do not vanish simultaneously. For example, xdx = −ydy has no solution through the origin.

Proof. Note that f (x) =� 0 for a < x < b or g(y) = 0� for c < y < d. Without loss of generality, we assume g(y) > 0 for c < y < d. Let (^) � (^) x �y F (x) = f (x)dx, G(x) = g(y)dy x 0 y 0 so that (4.3) becomes

(4.4) F (x) = G(x).

Since G�(y) = g(y) > 0 in R, by the inverse function theorem, G−^1 exists and (4.4) can be written

as y = G−^1 (F (x)). That means, dydx^ exists. Then, by differentiating (4.4), we get

F �(x) = G�(x)

dy , or f (x) = g(y)

dy . dx dx This implies (4.2). Moreover, (4.3) gives the initial condition that y = y 0 when x = x 0. To prove the uniqueness, let y be one solution of (4.2) and z be another solution with the same initial condition. Under the hypothesis, the equation

dz

f (x) dx g(z)

implies that dz/dx exists for any (x, z) ∈ R. Let

u = G(y), v = G(z).

Then, du dy dy = G�(y) = g(y) = f (x). dx dx dx

1

dz Similarly, = f (x). Since u and v have the same derivative, they differ by a constant. On the dx other hand, the initial conditions for u and v at x 0 agree. Therefore, u = v everywhere in R. This completes the proof. �

Example 4.2. Consider the initial value problem

(4.5)

dy = 1 + y 2 , y(0) = 1. dx Separating the variables, we write the differential equation as dy = dx. 1 + y^2

Since the constant function never vanishes, upon integration and evaluation, we obtain

tan−^1 y = x + c, tan−^1 1 = c.

Therefore, the (unique) solution of (4.5) is y = tan(x + π/4). The same result is obtained by integrating between corresponding limits y (^) dy x = dx. 1 1 +^ y^20

Orthogonal trajectories. If two families of curves are such that every curve of one family inter sects the curves of the other family at a right angle, then we say that the two families are orthogonal trajectories of each other. For example, the coordinate lines:

x = c 1 , y = c 2

in a Cartesian coordinate system form a set of orthogonal trajectories. Another example is the circles and radial lines r = c 1 , θ = c 2

in a polar coordinate system. Suppose a curve in the (x, y)-plane is such that the tangent at a point (x, y) on it makes an angle φ with the x-axis. The orthogonal trajectory through the same point (x, y) then makes an angle φ + π/ 2 with the x-axis. Since

1 tan(φ + π/2) = − cot φ = − tan φ dy dx dx and since the slope of the curve is dx

= tan φ, we should replace dy

by − dy

in the differential

equation for the original family to get the differential equation for the orthogonal trajectories.

Example 4.3. We consider the family of circles

(4.6) x^2 + y 2 = cx

tangent to the y axis. By differentiating (4.6) and by eliminating c, we obtain a differential equation dy 2 dy x^2 + y 2 = 2x + 2xy dx

, or y − x^2 = 2xy dx that the family of curves (4.6) satisfies. Replace dy/dx by −dx/dy we get the equation of the orthogonal trajectories dx y 2 − x^2 = − 2 xy dy

Lecture 4 2 18.034 Spring 2009