Snowball Sampling in Research: IRB Guidelines and Recommendations, Exercises of Ethics

An overview of snowball sampling, a recruitment technique used in research where participants are asked to identify potential subjects. The irb's perspective on snowball sampling, particularly in relation to sensitive topics and privacy concerns. It also includes recommendations for minimizing risks and obtaining consent.

Typology: Exercises

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

carlick
carlick 🇺🇸

4.2

(11)

276 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Source: Boise State University IRB
Snowball Sampling Recruitment Method
Snowball sampling is a recruitment technique in which research participants are asked to assist
researchers in identifying other potential subjects. For example, a researcher seeking to study
patterns of informal leadership in a community may ask individuals to name others who are
influential in a community. The use of currently enrolled research participants to recruit
additional research participants (sometimes referred to as “the snowball sampling”) may be
approved by the IRB under some circumstances. However, the protocol must include
justification of the use of this method in the context of the study and target population.
Consideration of minimal risk is likely to play an important role in IRB review of snowball
recruitment procedures. For example, it would make a big difference whether the research
involved extramarital affairs or substance use as opposed to family meal time routines or
leisure activities. To “cold call” someone on sensitive topic issues places him or her in a
potentially embarrassing situation, which should be avoided. Moreover, the original subject is
being placed in the position of being asked to disclose information about a third party without
that party’s consent.
Snowball recruitment where the researcher obtains names and contact information from one
individual for another one, particularly for research involving sensitive topics, is generally not
considered appropriate.
Using such a method could result in the researcher obtaining information about an individual
that is sensitive and private without their permission. Alternatively, the researcher should ask
other subjects to pass along flyers, emails, information sheets, etc. that contain contact
information for the researcher to prevent a breach in confidentiality or an invasion of privacy.
In instances where the research subject is not sensitive (i.e., opinions on politics, consumer
opinions), a snowball recruitment method where one person provides the name and contact
information may be acceptable. If the topic is sensitive or personal, snowball sampling may be
justified, but care should be taken to ensure that the potential subjects’ privacy is not violated.
For example, studies of networks of drug users or studies tracking sex partners require extreme
caution with information gathered from one subject about another.
The steps taken to minimize the risk of violating an individual’s privacy should be articulated in
the recruitment section of the protocol. Current participants cannot receive incentives or
compensation for referrals.
One means of reducing the risks in snowball recruitment is for the researcher to ask subjects
whether they would be willing to pass some information about the study they just completed
to other potential subjects. The researcher may give the original subject an information sheet
or flyer that they can give to people they think might be interested and qualified. Then these
potential participants can contact the researcher if they are interested. The researcher must
provide the IRB with a copy of the recruitment item (which must include all of the same
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Snowball Sampling in Research: IRB Guidelines and Recommendations and more Exercises Ethics in PDF only on Docsity!

Snowball Sampling Recruitment Method

Snowball sampling is a recruitment technique in which research participants are asked to assist researchers in identifying other potential subjects. For example, a researcher seeking to study patterns of informal leadership in a community may ask individuals to name others who are influential in a community. The use of currently enrolled research participants to recruit additional research participants (sometimes referred to as “the snowball sampling”) may be approved by the IRB under some circumstances. However, the protocol must include justification of the use of this method in the context of the study and target population. Consideration of minimal risk is likely to play an important role in IRB review of snowball recruitment procedures. For example, it would make a big difference whether the research involved extramarital affairs or substance use as opposed to family meal time routines or leisure activities. To “cold call” someone on sensitive topic issues places him or her in a potentially embarrassing situation, which should be avoided. Moreover, the original subject is being placed in the position of being asked to disclose information about a third party without that party’s consent. Snowball recruitment where the researcher obtains names and contact information from one individual for another one, particularly for research involving sensitive topics, is generally not considered appropriate. Using such a method could result in the researcher obtaining information about an individual that is sensitive and private without their permission. Alternatively, the researcher should ask other subjects to pass along flyers, emails, information sheets, etc. that contain contact information for the researcher to prevent a breach in confidentiality or an invasion of privacy. In instances where the research subject is not sensitive (i.e., opinions on politics, consumer opinions), a snowball recruitment method where one person provides the name and contact information may be acceptable. If the topic is sensitive or personal, snowball sampling may be justified, but care should be taken to ensure that the potential subjects’ privacy is not violated. For example, studies of networks of drug users or studies tracking sex partners require extreme caution with information gathered from one subject about another. The steps taken to minimize the risk of violating an individual’s privacy should be articulated in the recruitment section of the protocol. Current participants cannot receive incentives or compensation for referrals. One means of reducing the risks in snowball recruitment is for the researcher to ask subjects whether they would be willing to pass some information about the study they just completed to other potential subjects. The researcher may give the original subject an information sheet or flyer that they can give to people they think might be interested and qualified. Then these potential participants can contact the researcher if they are interested. The researcher must provide the IRB with a copy of the recruitment item (which must include all of the same

information that is in the initial recruitment script) he/she will give to the initial contact to distribute. If the potential subject were interested in study participation, they would be free to contact the researcher.

Some Reasons Snowball Recruitment Could Be Approved

Snowball recruitment could be approved for minimal risk projects for reasons such as:  People cannot always be depended upon to make phone calls and contacts. Even with good intentions, they forget, become busy, etc.;  If participants have to contact others, they may have to use their time to make at least two phone calls (one to other potential subjects and one to the investigator). Participants shouldn’t be required to do extra work if there is no practical risk involved;  Participants might not accurately describe the research and its purposes or they might prep other participants to provide particular responses.

Recommendations

The IRB recommends the following safeguard procedures if snowball recruitment is to be used:  Let subjects know that they will be asked to provide the names of other potential recruits, but that they have the right to decline to provide this information.  Obtain the nominating subject’s written permission to reveal their identity to subsequent contacts on the consent form via an initialed check list item. That is, if the subject agrees to provide names of other possible contacts, they could initial a check box on the consent form that they agree to allow their identity to be revealed to the subsequent contacts. Not initialing the box would be interpreted as meaning the subject was unwilling to permit his/her name to be used when making the additional contacts, even if he/she supplied the names and contact information.  Provide the IRB with a script detailing how the researcher will be obtaining the information for the snowball recruitment.  Acceptable alternatives that reach the same potential subjects include:  The study team member may provide information to subjects and encourage them to pass it on to others who may be interested or eligible. The information provided to enrolled subjects (fliers, letters of explanation, etc.) must be approved by the IRB. Interested prospective participants could then contact the project for more info and possible inclusion.  The study team member may ask subjects to obtain permission from others prior to disclosing their contact information. In this scenario, the researcher would not directly contact the referred/potential subject without permission from the potential subject and would not have access to any information about a potential subject without permission from that individual.  Examples provided by the National Science Foundation.

Sample Snowball Recruitment Letter