Solutions Exam 2 for Physics 471 - Fall 2006, Exams of Quantum Physics

The solutions to exam 2 for physics 471, which was held in fall 2006. It includes the calculation of eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and probabilities for a given hamiltonian matrix h, as well as the determination of energy levels and wave functions for a particular potential. The document also covers the normalization of wave functions and the orthonormality of basis sets.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/23/2009

koofers-user-96r
koofers-user-96r 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Physics 471 Solutions Exam 2 Fall 2006
1. (a) (2 pt) The eigenvalues of Hare given by
det(HE I) = det
2aE0a
0 2aE0
a0 2aE
= (2aE)³(2aE)2a2)´= 0 E=a, 2a, 3a .
(b) (2 pt) The eigenvectors satisfy
He1= 2ae1H e2= 3ae2He3=ae3.
(c) (2 pt) ψ(0) can be expanded in eigenstates of Has
ψ(0) = e
1ψ(0)e1+e
2ψ(0)e2+e
3ψ(0)e3
ψ(0) = 1
2e1+1
2e2+1
2e3.
Since the expansion of ψ(0) involves every eigenvector of H, the possible outcomes
of a measurement of the energy are a, 2a, 3a.
(d) (2 pt) The probabilities are
P(a) = 1
4P(2a) = 1
2P(3a) = 1
4.
2. (a) (1 pt) Since the δ-function only affects the solution at x=a, the potential term can
be ignored elsewhere, giving, effectively,
¯h2
2m
d2ψ
dx2= .
Substitution of any of the terms in the given solution then yields
E=¯h2k2
2m.
(b) (2 pt) The vanishing of ψat x= 0 gives BI= 0 and the vanishing of ψas x
gives BII = 0.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Solutions Exam 2 for Physics 471 - Fall 2006 and more Exams Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Physics 471 Solutions Exam 2 Fall 2006

  1. (a) (2 pt) The eigenvalues of H are given by

det(H − E I) = det

  2 a − E 0 a 0 2 a − E 0 a 0 2 a − E

 

= (2a − E)

( (2a − E)^2 − a^2 )

) = 0 ⇒ E = a, 2 a, 3 a.

(b) (2 pt) The eigenvectors satisfy

He 1 = 2ae 1 He 2 = 3ae 2 He 3 = ae 3.

(c) (2 pt) ψ(0) can be expanded in eigenstates of H as

ψ(0) = e† 1 ψ(0)e 1 + e† 2 ψ(0)e 2 + e† 3 ψ(0)e 3 ψ(0) = √^12 e 1 + 12 e 2 + 12 e 3.

Since the expansion of ψ(0) involves every eigenvector of H, the possible outcomes of a measurement of the energy are a, 2 a, 3 a. (d) (2 pt) The probabilities are

P (a) =

P (2a) =

P (3a) =

  1. (a) (1 pt) Since the δ-function only affects the solution at x = a, the potential term can be ignored elsewhere, giving, effectively,

¯h^2 2 m

d^2 ψ dx^2 = Eψ.

Substitution of any of the terms in the given solution then yields

E = −

¯h^2 k^2 2 m

(b) (2 pt) The vanishing of ψ at x = 0 gives BI = 0 and the vanishing of ψ as x → ∞ gives BII = 0.

(c) (3 pt) At x = a, the equality of ψI (a) and ψII (a) together with the derivative condition give

AI sinh(ka) = AII e−ka −kAII e−ka^ − kAI cosh(ka) = − λ a AII e−ka

and eliminating AI in favor of AII results in the condition

ka (1 + coth(ka)) = λ.

1 2 3 4 5 ka

2

4

6

8

10

ka + kacothka

(d) (1 pt) From the figure, λ > 1 for a bound state solution to exist.

  1. (a) (1 pt) Using the formula on the cover, a†| 4 〉 =

5 | 5 〉, so 〈 5 |a†| 4 〉 =

(b) (1 pt) This basis is not orthonormal since, for example, 〈f 0 |f 2 〉 6 = 0. (c) (1 pt) Since x = −1 is in the region of integration, the integral is ( (−1)^2 − 3(−1) + 5)

) | − 1 | = 9

(d) (2 pt) The probability that p lies between p and p + dp is ∣∣ ∣∣ ∣

√ (^) a π¯h

(1 + ipa/¯h)

∣∣ ∣∣ ∣

2 dp = a dp π¯h(1 + p^2 a^2 /h¯^2 )