Homework Solutions for Discrete Mathematical Structures, Assignments of Discrete Structures and Graph Theory

Solutions for homework 7 of the discrete mathematical structures course at the university of illinois. It includes proofs related to big-o notation, induction, recursive definitions, and structural induction.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/16/2009

koofers-user-q1c-1
koofers-user-q1c-1 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
CS 173: Discrete Mathematical Structures, Fall 2008
Homework 7 Solutions
1. [20 points] Big-O notation
Prove that the following big-O relationships hold.
(a) x2+x
x+1 is O(x2)
Solution: Note that x2+x
x+1 =xfor x0. Certainly xx2for
x > 0, so if we choose k= 0 and C= 1, it is easy to see that x2+x
x+1
is O(x2).
(b) x3is O(x4), but x4is not O(x3)
Solution: x3x4when x > 0, so choosing k= 0 and C= 1
show that x3is O(x4). Now, imagine that x4was O(x3). Then
there would exist some kand Csuch that x4Cx3for all x > k.
Dividing through by x3gives xC. But Cis a constant, while
xcan be arbitrarily large, so no such Cand kexist, and x4is not
O(x3).
(c) 10x+ 100 is Θ(x)
Solution: We must show that 10x+ 100 is O(x)and Ω(x). First,
clearly for x > 0it is the case that 10x+ 100 x, so choosing
k= 0 and C= 1 shows that 10x+ 100 is Ω(x). Secondly, if
x > 100 then 10x+ 100 11x, so choosing k= 100 and C= 11
shows that 10x+ 100 is O(x). Thus, 10x+ 100 is Θ(x).
(d) log10 xis Θ(log2x)
Solution: Note that by the change-of-base formula, log10 x=
log2x
log210 , so choosing k= 0 and C=1
log210 shows that log10 xis
both O(log2x)and Ω(log2x) in other words, it is Θ(log2x).
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Homework Solutions for Discrete Mathematical Structures and more Assignments Discrete Structures and Graph Theory in PDF only on Docsity!

CS 173: Discrete Mathematical Structures, Fall 2008

Homework 7 Solutions

  1. [20 points] Big-O notation Prove that the following big-O relationships hold.

(a) x (^2) +x x+1 is^ O(x

Solution: Note that x (^2) +x x+1 =^ x^ for^ x^ ≥^0. Certainly^ x^ ≤^ x

(^2) for x > 0 , so if we choose k = 0 and C = 1, it is easy to see that x (^2) +x x+ is O(x^2 ). (b) x^3 is O(x^4 ), but x^4 is not O(x^3 )

Solution: x^3 ≤ x^4 when x > 0 , so choosing k = 0 and C = 1 show that x^3 is O(x^4 ). Now, imagine that x^4 was O(x^3 ). Then there would exist some k and C such that x^4 ≤ Cx^3 for all x > k. Dividing through by x^3 gives x ≤ C. But C is a constant, while x can be arbitrarily large, so no such C and k exist, and x^4 is not O(x^3 ). (c) 10 x + 100 is Θ(x)

Solution: We must show that 10 x + 100 is O(x) and Ω(x). First, clearly for x > 0 it is the case that 10 x + 100 ≥ x, so choosing k = 0 and C = 1 shows that 10 x + 100 is Ω(x). Secondly, if x > 100 then 10 x + 100 ≤ 11 x, so choosing k = 100 and C = 11 shows that 10 x + 100 is O(x). Thus, 10 x + 100 is Θ(x). (d) log 10 x is Θ(log 2 x)

Solution: Note that by the change-of-base formula, log 10 x = log 2 x log 2 10 , so choosing^ k^ = 0^ and^ C^ =^

1 log 2 10 shows that^ log^10 x^ is both O(log 2 x) and Ω(log 2 x) – in other words, it is Θ(log 2 x).

  1. [10 points] Induction

Define the function f on the natural numbers by:

(1) f (0) = 0 (2) For every k > 0 , f (k) = k + f (b k 3 c) + f (b k 5 c) + f (b k 7 c)

Use strong induction to prove that f (k) < 4 k for every k > 0. Solution: Base case: f (1) = 1 + 3f (0) = 1 < 4. Inductive step: Assume f (j) < 4 j for all 0 < j < k. We must show that f (k) < 4 k. First, consider the case where k < 3. Then b k 3 c, b k 5 c, and b k 7 c are all equal to 0 , and f (k) = k which is less than 4 k (since k > 0 ). Next, consider the case where k ≥ 3. Then b k 3 c > 0 , so we can apply the inductive hypothesis to get f (b k 3 c) < 4 b k 3 c. Since bkc ≤ k, this implies that f (b k 3 c) < 43 k. Now, b k 5 c is either greater than or equal to 0. In the former case, following the above line of reasoning for b k 3 c, we find that f (b k 5 c) < 4 k

  1. In the latter case,^ f^ (0) = 0, so it is certainly the case that^ f^ (b^

k 5 c)^ < 4 k

  1. Similarly, we can show that^ f^ (b^

k 7 c)^ <^

4 k

Adding the terms together gives f (k) < k + 43 k + 45 k + 47 k = 389105 k , which is less than 4 k for k > 0. Thus, for all k > 0 , f (k) < 4 k. Alternate solution: Alternatively, we can simplify the inductive step by proving more base cases. Base cases: f (1) = 1 + 3f (0) = 1 < 4. f (2) = 2 + 3f (0) = 2 < 8. f (3) = 3 + f (1) + 2f (0) = 4 < 12. f (4) = 4 + f (1) + 2f (0) = 5 < 16. f (5) = 5 + f (1) + f (1) + f (0) = 7 < 20. f (6) = 6 + f (2) + f (1) + f (0) = 9 < 24. Inductive step: Assume f (j) < 4 j for all 0 < j < k, where k ≥ 7. We must show that f (k) < 4 k. Since k ≥ 7 , b k 3 c, b k 5 c, and b k 7 c are all at least 1 , and so we can apply our inductive hypothesis to get f (k) = k + f (b k 3 c) + f (b k 5 c) + f (b k 7 c) < k + 4b k 3 c + 4b k 5 c + 4b k 7 c. Since bxc ≤ x, we know that f (k) < k + 43 k + 45 k + 47 k = 389105 k , which is less than 4 k for k > 0. Thus, for all k > 0 , f (k) < 4 k.

  1. [6 points] Recursive definition 2

(a) Suppose that A = (x, y) and B = (p, q) are 2D points with real coordinates. Here is the definition of a simple, familiar geomet- rical object based on A and B. Name it!

X(A, B) = {(αx + (1 − α)p, αy + (1 − α)q) : α ∈ [0, 1]}

Remember that [0, 1] is the set of real numbers between 0 and 1, inclusive. Solution: X(A, B) is the line segment between (x, y) and (p, q). (b) The set T ∈ R^2 is defined by (1) (1, 0), (1, 3), (4, 0) ∈ T (2) If (x, y) ∈ T , then (−x, y) ∈ T. (3) If (x, y) ∈ T and (p, q) ∈ T , then (αx + (1 − α)p, αy + (1 − α)q) ∈ T , for every α ∈ [0, 1], Describe the contents of T in words, draw a picture of the set, and briefly justify your answer. Solution: Given the result from part a, rule 3 says that for any two points in T , all the points on the line segment between them are also in T. What are the implications of this rule? First, it is certainly the case that the line segments between the three points in rule 1 are in T – in other words, the edges of the triangle whose corners are (1, 0), (1, 3), and (4, 0) are in T. Let’s call this triangle R. Furthermore, we can apply rule 3 to the points added in this way, so the line segment between any two points on the edge of the triangle is also in T. Thus, the entire interior of the triangle R is in T. Now, applying rule 2 adds the reflection of the triangle R over the y-axis. So our set T now contains two triangles. Applying rule 3 again, T must also contain all the line segments between points in the triangle R and points in the reflection of R. So T also contains the rectangular area between the two triangles. In short, T contains the trapezoid with corners at (1, 3), (4, 0), (− 1 , 3), and (− 4 , 0). The graph of T is:

A clarification on terminology – for clarity, I’ve said that a line segment is in T if all the points on the line segment are in T , and an area is in T if all the points in the area are in T. T does not actually contain any line segments or areas, only points on or in them.

  1. [10 points] Structural induction

Define a set M ∈ Z^2 is defined by

(1) (0, 1) ∈ M (2) If (x, y) ∈ M , then (x + 1, y + 2x + 3) ∈ M

(a) Starting with (0, 1), write out the six pairs with the smallest first coordinates. Solution: (0, 1), (1, 4), (2, 9), (3, 16), (4, 25), (5, 36) (b) State the (simple) relationship that holds between the first and second coordinates of all pairs in M. Solution: If the pair (x, y) is in M , then y = (x + 1)^2. (c) Use structural induction to prove that your answer to (b) is cor- rect. Solution: Base case: (0 + 1)^2 = 1. So the relationship holds for (0, 1). Inductive step: Assume that for some (x, y) ∈ M , y = (x+1)^2. We must show that the property holds for (x + 1, y + 2x + 3), in other words, that y+2x+3 = ((x+1)+1)^2. That is, y+2x+3 = (x+2)^2. We know from the inductive hypothesis that y = (x + 1)^2. So y +2x+3 = (x+1)^2 +2x+3 = x^2 +2x+1+2x+3 = x^2 +4x+4 = (x + 2)^2. Thus, for any pair (x, y) in M , y = (x + 1)^2 , by structural induc- tion.