Solutions to Problem Set 4 - Random Processes – 2010 | ECE 534, Assignments of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Material Type: Assignment; Professor: Srikant; Class: Random Processes; Subject: Electrical and Computer Engr; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Spring 2010;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 05/09/2010

zhaowen
zhaowen 🇺🇸

5

(2)

11 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ECE 534: Random Pro cesses Spring 2010
Solutions to Problem Set 4
2.21 Applications of Jensen’s inequality
(a) Convex function: ϕ(u) = 1
u. Random variable X.
(b) Convex function: ϕ(u) = u2. Random variable X2.
(c) Convex function: ϕ(u) = uln u. Random variable L=f(Y)/g(Y) where Yhas prob-
ability density g. Indeed, in this case, Jensen’s inequality is E[ϕ(L)] ϕ(E[L]).
But E[ϕ(L)] = RAf(y)
g(y)ln f(y)
g(y)g(y)dy =D(f|g), and E[Y] = RAf(y)
g(y)g(y)dy =
RAf(y)dy = 1 and ϕ(1) = 0, so that Jensen’s inequality becomes D(f|g)0.
Another solution is to use the function ϕ(u) = ln uand the random variable Z=
g(X)/f(X), where Xhas density f. Indeed, in this case, Jensen’s inequality is E[ϕ(Z)]
ϕ(E[Z]). But E[ϕ(Z)] = RAln g(x)
f(x)f(x)dx =D(f|g), and E[Z] = RAg(x)
f(x)f(x)dx =
RAg(x)dx = 1 and ϕ(1) = 0, so that Jensen’s inequality becomes D(f|g)0.
2.29 Chernoff bound for Gaussian and Poisson random variables
(a) ln MX(θ) = µθ +θ2σ2
2and l(a) = maxθ (µθ +θ2σ2
2) = (aµ)2
2σ2.Taking a=µ+cin
the optimized Chernoff inequality yields P{XE[X] + c} exp(c2
2σ2) for c0.
(b) The log moment generating function of Yis given by lnMY(θ) = ln P
k=0 eθkλkeλ
k!=
ln(eλ(eθ1)) = λ(eθ1). Therefore,
l(a) = max
θ eλ(θ1) = aln( a
λ) + λa
Setting a=λ+cin the optimized Chernoff inequality yields
P{YE[Y] + c} exp (λ+c) ln λ+c
λ+c
(c) Using the definition of ψyields c2
2λψ(c
λ) = λg(1 + c
λ)=(λ+c) ln λ+c
λcas desired. For
more information see Shorack and Wellner, Empirical Processess, 1986.
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Solutions to Problem Set 4 - Random Processes – 2010 | ECE 534 and more Assignments Electrical and Electronics Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

ECE 534: Random Processes Spring 2010

Solutions to Problem Set 4

2.21 Applications of Jensen’s inequality

(a) Convex function: ϕ(u) = (^1) u. Random variable X.

(b) Convex function: ϕ(u) = u^2. Random variable X^2.

(c) Convex function: ϕ(u) = u ln u. Random variable L = f (Y )/g(Y ) where Y has prob- ability density g. Indeed, in this case, Jensen’s inequality is E[ϕ(L)] ≥ ϕ(E[L]). But E[ϕ(L)] =

A

( (^) f (y) g(y) ln^

f (y) g(y)

g(y)dy = D(f |g), and E[Y ] =

A

( (^) f (y) g(y)

g(y)dy = ∫ A f^ (y)dy^ = 1 and^ ϕ(1) = 0, so that Jensen’s inequality becomes^ D(f^ |g)^ ≥^ 0. Another solution is to use the function ϕ(u) = − ln u and the random variable Z = g(X)/f (X), where X has density f. Indeed, in this case, Jensen’s inequality is E[ϕ(Z)] ≥ ϕ(E[Z]). But E[ϕ(Z)] =

A −^ ln^

g(x) f (x) f^ (x)dx^ =^ D(f^ |g), and^ E[Z] =^

A

g(x) f (x)

f (x)dx = ∫ A g(x)dx^ = 1 and^ ϕ(1) = 0, so that Jensen’s inequality becomes^ D(f^ |g)^ ≥^ 0.

2.29 Chernoff bound for Gaussian and Poisson random variables

(a) ln MX (θ) = μθ + θ

(^2) σ 2 2 and^ l(a) = maxθ^ aθ^ −^ (μθ^ +^

θ^2 σ^2 2 ) =^

(a−μ)^2 2 σ^2.^ Taking^ a^ =^ μ^ +^ c^ in the optimized Chernoff inequality yields P {X ≥ E[X] + c} ≤ exp(− c

2 2 σ^2 ) for^ c^ ≥^ 0.

(b) The log moment generating function of Y is given by ln MY (θ) = ln

k=

eθk^ λk^ e−λ k! = ln(eλ(e

θ (^) −1) ) = λ(eθ^ − 1). Therefore,

l(a) = max θ

aθ − eλ(θ − 1) = a ln(

a λ

) + λ − a

Setting a = λ + c in the optimized Chernoff inequality yields

P {Y ≥ E[Y ] + c} ≤ exp

−(λ + c) ln

λ + c λ

  • c

(c) Using the definition of ψ yields c

2 2 λ ψ(^

c λ ) =^ λg(1 +^

c λ ) = (λ^ +^ c) ln^

λ+c λ −^ c^ as desired. For more information see Shorack and Wellner, Empirical Processess, 1986.

1

ECE 534 HW4 Spring 2010

3.3 Calculation of some minimum mean square error estimators

(a) Note that Cov(X, Y ) = Var(X) and Var(Y ) = Var(X) + Var(N ). By the formulas for linear MMSE estimation, Ê [X|Y ] = E[X] + Cov(X,Y^ ) Var(Y ) (Y^ −^ E[Y^ ]) =^

1 λ +^

1 /λ^2 1 /λ^2 +σ^2 (Y^ −^

1 λ ) =^

Y +λσ^2 1+λ^2 σ^2 E[e^2 ] = Var(X) − Cov(X, Y )^2 /Var(Y ) = (^) λ^12 − (1/λ^4 )/( (^) λ^12 + σ^2 ) = σ

2 1+λ^2 σ^2

(b) No. Observe that X is nonnegative, but the estimator Ê [X|Y ] can be negative. An estimator with smaller MSE is X̂ = max{ 0 , Ê [X|Y ]}, because (X − X̂ )^2 ≤ (X − Ê [X|Y ])^2 with probability one, and the inequality is strict whenever Ê [X|Y ] < 0. An alternative proof is to find some nonlinear g(Y ) such that X − Ê [X|Y ] 6 ⊥ g(Y ). For example, one can show that E[(X − Ê [X|Y ])Y 2 ] = 2 σ

2 λ(1+λ^2 σ^2 ) 6 = 0 and thus Ê [X|Y ] is not the MMSE estimator.

2