
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Material Type: Assignment; Professor: Cohen; Class: ELEC LIGHT REL MOD PHYS; Subject: Physics; University: University of Maryland; Term: Spring 2009;
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!

Remember: In addition to this problem, you also have a “Mastering Physics” assignment due outside of my office at 10:00 on Friday March 27. There is also a Mastering Physics Assignment due of March 7 In class when discussing the Yound double slit experiment (and diffraction gratings) we assumed that the incident light was normal to the slits (or grating). In this problem we work out what happens if it comes in at an angle θ in as in the figure below; the dashed
line represents the direction normal to the slits. For simplicity we consider the double slit case where the spacing between the slits is d. The arrows represent the direction of the light; wave crests are perpendicular to it. The purpose of the problem
Because the incident wave is come in at an angle there is a phase difference between the upper and lower slits. This phase difference alters the result from that obtained in class.
a) As a first step show that the phase at the upper slit is ahead of the lower slit in
phase by an amount given by
2 d sin( in ) ∆ =. (Hint: this can be shown by the
same argument used in the derivation of Snell’s law.)
b) Explain why the condition for a maximum to occur at some point in the light
emerging from the slits is that
m
rl ru
for
m = 0 , ± 1 ,± 2 ,± 3 , Lwhere rl and ru are distances from the point to the lower and upper slits respectively. Recall that the maximum occurs when the light emerging
constructive interference takes place.
c) Show that maxima occur at angles given by d
m in
for m = 0 , ± 1 ,± 2 ,± 3 ,L. Hint: recall in our derivation for the normally incident
than d from the slits. You can use that result here.