Solved Problems Set 2 - Commutative Algebra | MATH 614, Assignments of Mathematics

Material Type: Assignment; Class: Commuta Algebra; Subject: Mathematics; University: University of Michigan - Ann Arbor; Term: Fall 2008;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/02/2009

koofers-user-wtn
koofers-user-wtn 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 614, Fall 2008 Problem Set #2: Solutions
1. In the category of sets, the empty set is an initial object and a set with one element
is a final object. In the category of commutative rings with identity,Zis an initial object
(the unique map ZRsends nto n·1R) and the 0 ring is a final object. In the category
of modules over a ring R, the 0 module is both an initial and a final object.
2. f=hbecause, by the universal mapping property of localization, the map RT
given by gf =hf factors uniquely through S(since f(W) consists of units of S,gf(W)
consists of units of T).
Alternatively, every element of Shas the form r/w where rRand wW. Then
(gf )(w)g(r/w) = g(w/1)g(r/w) = g(r/1) = (gf )(r)=(hf)(r) = h(r/1) = h(w/1)h(r/w) =
(hf)(w)h(r/w). Since (gf)(w)=(hf )(w), we can conclude that g(r/w) = h(r/w) provided
that (gf )(w) is invertible in T. But (gf)(w) = g(w/1) has inverse g(1/w), as required.
3. We have the localization homomorphism RU1Rthat sends r7→ r/1. Since
the image of Wconsists of units in U1R, there is a unique R-algebra homomorphism
W1RU1Rthat sends r/w to r/w (the two symbols have different meanings: in
the second instance, wis to be thought of as an element of U). Since the image of
e
V
consists of units in U1Rwe have a unique homomorphism α:
e
V1S
=U1Rthat
sends (r/w)/(v/1) 7→ r/(vw). Similarly, since the image of U=V W consists of units
in
e
V1S(the inverse of vw is (1/w)/v), we have a unique R-algebra homomorphism
β:U1R
e
V1Sthat sends r/(vw)7→ (r/w)/(v/1). It is now obvious that αβis the
identity on U1Rand that βαis the identity on
e
V1S.
4. Let s=1 + p
2. This element is integral over Z, since it is a root of x2xk= 0.
Clearly, sis in the fraction field of Z[p], which is Q[p]. Note that p= 2s1, so
Z[p]Z[s]. Since s2=s+k, the set Z+Zsis already closed under multiplication, and
so Z[s] = Z+Zs. Now suppose that a+bpis integral over Z, where a, b Q. We shall
show that a+bpZ. If b= 0, this follows because Zis a PID, hence, a UFD, and is
normal. If b6= 0 the minimal monic polynomial of a+bpover Qis (xa)2b2p= 0.
Since Zis normal, if a+b5 is integral over Z, we must have that the coefficients are in
Z, i.e., that 2aand a2b2pare in Z. Thus, we we may assume that a=n/2, where
nZ. By subtracting ns we obtain a new integral element of the form cp, where cis
rational. To complete the proof, it suffices to show cmust be an integer. Then (cp)2is
integral over Zand rational, and so must be an integer. Since pc2is an integer, we can
write c2=n/p. But when we write c=r/s is in lowest terms, r, s Z,s > 0, r2/s2is also
in lowest terms, which implies that s2divides p. Thus, s= 1, as required.
5. (a) Let A=RQand B=RQ0. Then a prime is contained in both Pand Q
if and only if it is disjoint from both Aand B, and this holds if and only if it is disjoint
from AB, since the complement of a prime is a multiplicative system. Thus, there exists
a prime contained in both Qand Q0if and only if AB does not contain the element 0,
i.e., if and only if there do not exist aRQand bRQ0such that ab = 0. If
there is no such prime, then with aAand bBsuch that ab = 0, we have that
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Solved Problems Set 2 - Commutative Algebra | MATH 614 and more Assignments Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 614, Fall 2008 Problem Set #2: Solutions

  1. In the category of sets, the empty set is an initial object and a set with one element is a final object. In the category of commutative rings with identity,Z is an initial object (the unique map Z → R sends n to n · (^1) R) and the 0 ring is a final object. In the category of modules over a ring R, the 0 module is both an initial and a final object.
  2. f = h because, by the universal mapping property of localization, the map R → T given by gf = hf factors uniquely through S (since f (W ) consists of units of S, gf (W ) consists of units of T ). 

Alternatively, every element of S has the form r/w where r ∈ R and w ∈ W. Then (gf )(w)g(r/w) = g(w/1)g(r/w) = g(r/1) = (gf )(r) = (hf )(r) = h(r/1) = h(w/1)h(r/w) = (hf )(w)h(r/w). Since (gf )(w) = (hf )(w), we can conclude that g(r/w) = h(r/w) provided that (gf )(w) is invertible in T. But (gf )(w) = g(w/1) has inverse g(1/w), as required. 

  1. We have the localization homomorphism R → U −^1 R that sends r 7 → r/1. Since the image of W consists of units in U −^1 R, there is a unique R-algebra homomorphism W −^1 R → U −^1 R that sends r/w to r/w (the two symbols have different meanings: in

the second instance, w is to be thought of as an element of U ). Since the image of V˜ consists of units in U −^1 R we have a unique homomorphism α : V˜ −^1 S ∼= U −^1 R that sends (r/w)/(v/1) 7 → r/(vw). Similarly, since the image of U = V W consists of units

in V˜ −^1 S (the inverse of vw is (1/w)/v), we have a unique R-algebra homomorphism β : U −^1 R → V˜ −^1 S that sends r/(vw) 7 → (r/w)/(v/1). It is now obvious that α ◦ β is the

identity on U −^1 R and that β ◦ α is the identity on V˜ −^1 S. 

  1. Let s =

p 2

. This element is integral over Z, since it is a root of x^2 − x − k = 0.

Clearly, s is in the fraction field of Z[

p], which is Q[

p]. Note that

p = 2s − 1, so Z[

p] ⊆ Z[s]. Since s^2 = s + k, the set Z + Zs is already closed under multiplication, and so Z[s] = Z + Zs. Now suppose that a + b

p is integral over Z, where a, b ∈ Q. We shall show that a + b

p ∈ Z. If b = 0, this follows because Z is a PID, hence, a UFD, and is normal. If b 6 = 0 the minimal monic polynomial of a + b

p over Q is (x − a)^2 − b^2 p = 0.

Since Z is normal, if a + b

5 is integral over Z, we must have that the coefficients are in Z, i.e., that − 2 a and a^2 − b^2 p are in Z. Thus, we we may assume that a = n/2, where n ∈ Z. By subtracting ns we obtain a new integral element of the form c

p, where c is rational. To complete the proof, it suffices to show c must be an integer. Then (c

p)^2 is integral over Z and rational, and so must be an integer. Since pc^2 is an integer, we can write c^2 = n/p. But when we write c = r/s is in lowest terms, r, s ∈ Z, s > 0, r^2 /s^2 is also in lowest terms, which implies that s^2 divides p. Thus, s = 1, as required. 

  1. (a) Let A = R − Q and B = R − Q′. Then a prime is contained in both P and Q if and only if it is disjoint from both A and B, and this holds if and only if it is disjoint from AB, since the complement of a prime is a multiplicative system. Thus, there exists a prime contained in both Q and Q′^ if and only if AB does not contain the element 0, i.e., if and only if there do not exist a ∈ R − Q and b ∈ R − Q′^ such that ab = 0. If there is no such prime, then with a ∈ A and b ∈ B such that ab = 0, we have that

Q ∈ D(a) = Spec (R) − V (a) and Q′^ ∈ D(b) while D(a) ∩ D(b) = ∅: the fact that ab = 0 shows that V (a) ∪ V (b) = Spec (R). 

(b) Let Q and Q′^ be distinct prime ideals. Then there is no prime ideal contained in both, since there cannot be a strict containment of two primes. By part (a), Q and Q′^ have disjoint open neighborhoods. This proves that X is a Hausdorff space. It was shown in class that Spec (R) is always quasicompact, so that X is compact. A quasicompact subspace must then be closed. Let two points be given. Then the first has an open neighborhood of the form D(a) that does not contain the second, and D(a) is quasicompact and so closed as well as open.

  1. Let M be the set of monomials xk 1 1 · · · xk nn in the xi such that 0 ≤ ki < ni for every i. We claim that the image of M spans the quotient T = S/(F 1 ,... , Fn)S as an R-module. If not, there is some monomial μ whose image is not in the R-span T 0 of M. Choose such a μ of smallest possible degree. Some xi must occur with exponent at least ni in μ, or else μ would be in T 0. Hence, we can write μ = xn i iν for some monomial ν. The equation Fi = 0 holds in T and may be used to espress xn i i as an R-linear combination of lower degree monomials. Multiply by ν. This enables one to write μ = xn i iν as an R-linear combination of lower degree monomials, and these are in T 0. Hence, μ ∈ T 0 , a contradiction.