Solutions to Quiz 2 in Math 213, Section B1, for the inequality 3n >= 2n2 + 1, Quizzes of Discrete Mathematics

The solutions to quiz 2 in math 213, section b1, for the inequality 3n >= 2n2 + 1. The solutions are based on mathematical induction.

Typology: Quizzes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/10/2009

koofers-user-o0f-1
koofers-user-o0f-1 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Math 213, Section B1, Quiz 2 (SOLUTIONS); Friday, February 2, 2007
1. Using induction, prove that for every integer n2
3n2n2+ 1.
Solution. 1) Base of Induction. First, check if the statement 3n
2n2+ 1 holds for n= 2.
We have 32= 9 and 2 ·22+ 1 = 2 ·4 + 1 = 9. Since 9 9, the
required statement does hold for n= 2.
2) Inductive Step.
Let k2 and suppose that 3k2k2+ 1 is known to hold. We need
to derive that 3k+1 2(k+ 1)2+ 1, that is, 3k+1 2(k2+ 2k+ 1) + 1,
that is, 3k+1 2k2+ 4k+ 3.
The inductive hypothesis
3k2k2+ 1 by multiplying by 3 implies
3k+1 6k2+ 3.
To show that 3k+1 2k2+ 4k+ 3 it suffices to establish that for k2
we have 6k2+ 3 2k2+ 4k+ 3.
We have:
6k2+ 3 2k2+ 4k+ 3 is equivalent to:
4k24kby dividing by 4k > 0, is equivalent to:
k1,
which holds since by assumption k2. Thus for k2 we have
6k2+ 3 2k2+ 4k+ 3, as required.
1

Partial preview of the text

Download Solutions to Quiz 2 in Math 213, Section B1, for the inequality 3n >= 2n2 + 1 and more Quizzes Discrete Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Math 213, Section B1, Quiz 2 (SOLUTIONS); Friday, February 2, 2007

  1. Using induction, prove that for every integer n ≥ 2

3 n^ ≥ 2 n^2 + 1. Solution. 1) Base of Induction. First, check if the statement 3n^ ≥

2 n^2 + 1 holds for n = 2. We have 3^2 = 9 and 2 · 22 + 1 = 2 · 4 + 1 = 9. Since 9 ≥ 9, the required statement does hold for n = 2.

  1. Inductive Step. Let k ≥ 2 and suppose that 3k^ ≥ 2 k^2 + 1 is known to hold. We need to derive that 3k+1^ ≥ 2(k + 1)^2 + 1, that is, 3k+1^ ≥ 2(k^2 + 2k + 1) + 1, that is, 3k+1^ ≥ 2 k^2 + 4k + 3. The inductive hypothesis 3 k^ ≥ 2 k^2 + 1 by multiplying by 3 implies

3 k+1^ ≥ 6 k^2 + 3. To show that 3k+1^ ≥ 2 k^2 + 4k + 3 it suffices to establish that for k ≥ 2 we have 6k^2 + 3 ≥ 2 k^2 + 4k + 3. We have: 6 k^2 + 3 ≥ 2 k^2 + 4k + 3 is equivalent to:

4 k^2 ≥ 4 k by dividing by 4k > 0, is equivalent to: k ≥ 1 , which holds since by assumption k ≥ 2. Thus for k ≥ 2 we have 6 k^2 + 3 ≥ 2 k^2 + 4k + 3, as required.

1