Species Classification - Evolution - Lecture Slides, Slides of Theory of Evolution

Species Classification, Evolution and Classification, Physical Attributes, Numerical Taxonomy, Phenetic Classification, Neighbour-Joining, Joining Clusters, Mosaic Evolution are the key important points of lecture slides of Evolution.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/02/2013

raaj
raaj 🇮🇳

4.6

(8)

92 documents

1 / 24

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture 10: Evolution & Classification
cont ’d
Species Classification:
Phenetic: physical attributes, numerical
taxonomy
Cladistic (Phylogenetic): evolutionary
relationships
Evolutionary: synthesis of the two
Reflect Philosophical Differences
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18

Partial preview of the text

Download Species Classification - Evolution - Lecture Slides and more Slides Theory of Evolution in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture 10: Evolution & Classification

cont’d

Species Classification:

  • Phenetic: physical attributes, numerical taxonomy
  • Cladistic (Phylogenetic): evolutionary relationships
  • Evolutionary: synthesis of the two

Reflect Philosophical Differences

Phenetic Classification

  • “Like with like”
  • Use many characters to define overall similarity
  • Linnaean
    • Before Darwin so not based on Evolution (but may reflect history)
  • Current: reaction to uncertainty of cladistics
  • Problem: uses all types of characters (analogies, ancestral & derived homologies)
  1. construct matrix with pairwise S values

  2. use clustering technique to produce a dendrogram

e.g. UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averaging) or Neighbour-joining

Unweighted/Equal weighting = all characters given equal consideration

unweighting is a type of weighting!

may introduce bias…..

Example

Taxon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 B 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 C 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 D 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0

Character Matrix

Taxon A B C D A -- 0.3 0.4 0. B -- 0.5 0. C -- 0. D --

S-value Matrix

Problems

  • Different methods or characters = different dendrograms
  • If used all characteristics would = natural classification (Impossible!)
  • dendrogram = phylogeny if differences between taxa proportional to time elapsed since common ancestor

Unfortunately…

  1. Mosaic Evolution: differences in rate of change of characters in a lineage
  2. Homoplasy: shared characters not in common ancestor (analogy)

Why retained?

A) Developmental Canalization

  • Character change requires change

in developmental program (rare)

B) General Adaptations

  • Useful in large number of ecological contexts

e.g. Rodentia - incisors conserved

  • legs evolved rapidly

Homoplasy

↑ # characters used, ↑ chance of homoplasy

A. Convergent Evolution

  • Similar phenotypic response to similar ecological conditions
  • Different developmental pathways

C. Evolutionary Reversal

  • degeneration of complex structure
  • looks primitive, actually derived
  • e.g. Winglessness in Fleas & Lice
    • 2 different winged ancestors

Dollo’s law : complex structures that are lost are unlikely to be regained

Exceptions: snake eyes, molars in some felids

Frogs with Teeth?

  • Reversals & Parallelism common because of potentialities (bias) of developmental systems
  • Frogs lost teeth in lower jaw in the Jurassic
  • Teeth can be expt’lly induced
  • Gastrotheca guentheri – re-evolved true teeth

Example of phenetics gone wrong

  • Limpet, Barnacle, Lobster:
  • But, lobster & barnacle more closely related…convergence

Barnacle Limpet Lobster

Cladistics

  • Greek: klados = branch
  • Join spp. into truly MONOPHYLETIC groups (avoid pitfalls of phyletic approach)
  • Hennig (1979) - key to monophyletic groups:

Unique Synapomorphies: shared, derived characters

  • Focus on CLADOGENESIS, ignores anagenesis

Ancestral traits

Criteria to determine primitiveness:

  • Presence in fossils
  • Commonness across taxa
  • Early appearance in phylogeny
  • Presence in outgroup

Cladograms

  1. select group of organisms

  2. determine characters & states

  3. for each character, classify ancestral & derived

  • comparison to outgroup
  • traits shared with outgroup = ancestral
  1. group by shared derived characters (synapomorphies)

  2. choose most parsimonious tree

(fewest evolutionary transitions)