Stanford Prison Experiment: A Case Study in Human Behavior, Lecture notes of Psychology

The total land surface of New Jersey is, approximately, 7,525 square miles, the average number of personfl square mile at the censuses of 1890 and 1900 being ...

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022
On special offer
30 Points
Discount

Limited-time offer


Uploaded on 09/27/2022

sheetal_101
sheetal_101 🇺🇸

4.8

(17)

234 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Homework: Read the article below about the Stanford Prison Experiment. Afterwards,
write a full paragraph summary of the article (approximately 6 sentences) in which you
touch on how the experiment was set up, what happened during the experiment, and what
we learn from it.
From www.experiment-resources.com
STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT
This infamous Stanford Prison Experiment has etched its place in history, as a notorious
example of the unexpected effects that can occur when psychological experiments into
human nature are performed.
by Martyn Shuttleworth (2008)
Like a real life ‘Lord of the Flies’, it showed a degeneration and breakdown of the
established rules and morals dictating exactly how people should behave towards each
other.
The study created more new questions than it answered, about the amorality and darkness
that inhabits the human psyche.
As a purely scientific venture, the experiment was a failure, but it generated some results
that give an insight into human psychology and social behavior. The ethical implications
of this study are still discussed in college and undergraduate psychology classes all across
the world.
In the days of the Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo abuses, the Stanford Prison Experiment is
once again becoming relevant, showing that systematic abuse and denial of human rights
is never far away in any prison facility.
This study is so well known that a Hollywood movie about the Stanford Prison
Experiment is going to be released in 2009. The experiment has also been the basis of
many similar studies, over the years, but these have had much stricter controls and
monitoring in place.
BACKGROUND
In 1971, the psychologist Philip Zimbardo tried to show that prison guards and convicts
would tend to slip into predefined roles, behaving in a way that they thought was
required, rather than using their own judgment and morals.
Zimbardo was trying to show what happened when all of the individuality and dignity
was stripped away from a human, and their life was completely controlled.
He wanted show the dehumanization and loosening of social and moral values that can
happen to guards immersed in such a situation.
METHOD
To conduct the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo constructed a mock correctional
facility in the basement of Stanford University.
pf3
pf4
Discount

On special offer

Partial preview of the text

Download Stanford Prison Experiment: A Case Study in Human Behavior and more Lecture notes Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Homework: Read the article below about the Stanford Prison Experiment. Afterwards, write a full paragraph summary of the article (approximately 6 sentences) in which you touch on how the experiment was set up, what happened during the experiment, and what we learn from it. From www.experiment-resources.com

STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT

This infamous Stanford Prison Experiment has etched its place in history, as a notorious example of the unexpected effects that can occur when psychological experiments into human nature are performed. by Martyn Shuttleworth (2008) Like a real life ‘Lord of the Flies’, it showed a degeneration and breakdown of the established rules and morals dictating exactly how people should behave towards each other. The study created more new questions than it answered, about the amorality and darkness that inhabits the human psyche. As a purely scientific venture, the experiment was a failure, but it generated some results that give an insight into human psychology and social behavior. The ethical implications of this study are still discussed in college and undergraduate psychology classes all across the world. In the days of the Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo abuses, the Stanford Prison Experiment is once again becoming relevant, showing that systematic abuse and denial of human rights is never far away in any prison facility. This study is so well known that a Hollywood movie about the Stanford Prison Experiment is going to be released in 2009. The experiment has also been the basis of many similar studies, over the years, but these have had much stricter controls and monitoring in place.

BACKGROUND

In 1971, the psychologist Philip Zimbardo tried to show that prison guards and convicts would tend to slip into predefined roles, behaving in a way that they thought was required, rather than using their own judgment and morals. Zimbardo was trying to show what happened when all of the individuality and dignity was stripped away from a human, and their life was completely controlled. He wanted show the dehumanization and loosening of social and moral values that can happen to guards immersed in such a situation.

METHOD

To conduct the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo constructed a mock correctional facility in the basement of Stanford University.

Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Mainly middle class and white, they were divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. In an initiation meeting, Zimbardo, who acted as the warden for the duration of the Stanford Prison Experiment, informed the guards that the only rule was that no physical punishment was allowed. Other than that, the guards were to run the prison as they saw fit, and would be divided into regular working shifts and patterns. Prisoners, by contrast, were dressed in cheap smocks and were allowed no underwear. They were to be addressed by, and answer to, identity numbers only. They also had a small chain around one ankle to remind them that they were inmates in a correctional facility. Conditions were tough, with only basic sleeping mattresses and plain food being supplied. The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of the experiment; their homes were raided without any warning, arrested by the real local police department and charged with armed robbery. The Palo Alto Police had agreed to help with the experiment. As if they were real-life suspects, the prisoners were read their rights and had their mug shots and fingerprints taken. After being stripped, searched and de-loused, they were taken into the cells that would be their homes for the next two weeks. Zimbardo, acting as a prison warden, would be able to observe and make notes about what happened during the course of the study.

RESULTS

The Stanford Prison Experiment degenerated very quickly and the dark and inhuman side of human nature became apparent very quickly. The prisoners began to suffer a wide array of humiliations and punishments at the hands of the guards, and many began to show signs of mental and emotional distress. On the second day of the experiment, the prisoners organized a mass revolt and riot, as a protest about the conditions. Guards worked extra hours and devised a strategy to break up and put down the riot, using fire-extinguishers. No prompt for this action was given by Zimbardo; the guards used their own initiative to formulate the plan. Standard prisoner counts and roll-call became a trial of ordeal and ritual humiliation for the prisoners, with forced exercise and physical punishments becoming more and more common. Mattresses were confiscated from the prisoners and they were forced to sleep on cold, hard floors.

CRITICISMS

The ethics of the Stanford Prison Experiment have long been called into question, and, certainly, without stricter controls this experiment would not be sanctioned today; it could pose a genuine risk to people disposed towards mental and emotional imbalances. In fairness to Zimbardo, most of these discussions take place with a lot of hindsight, and he could not have guessed the internalization and institutionalization that would occur during the course of the study. Other criticisms include the validity of the results. It was a field experiment, rather than a scientific experiment, so there are only observational results and no scientific evaluation. In addition, it would be very difficult for anybody to replicate the experiment conditions. The selection of the subjects has been questioned extensively with the wording of the advert stating ‘wanted for prison experiments’, this may have caused people with more of a pre-disposition towards violence to apply. In the aftermath of the study, many of the guards and prisoners indicated that they were only acting out roles that they thought were expected of them, so there is no consensus on whether the study really portrayed human nature or not. Whether the Stanford Prison Experiment relates to real prisons is another matter. Although maltreatment of prisoners undoubtedly takes place all across the world, in most facilities, the guards are carefully screened and undergo a long and extensive training process. They also have rigid protocols to which they are supposed to stick. In addition, the study studied only male subjects and most western prisons do have a mix of sexes on the guard staff. Zimbardo also glossed over the fact that not all of the guards showed sadistic tendencies, with some seeking to actively help the prisoners and show sympathy towards them. Later studies have concluded that abuse in prisons often comes from the top down and that when orders are given these can affect the results. If the guards had been given stricter guidelines from Zimbardo at the beginning then there may have been fewer sadistic tendencies shown by the guards selected for the Stanford Prison Experiment.