Solutions to Exam 2, Calculus 3, APPM 2350, Fall 2008, Exams of Advanced Calculus

The solutions to exam 2 for the calculus 3 course, appm 2350, which was offered in the fall 2008 semester. The solutions cover various calculus problems, including finding critical points, minimizing functions, and computing integrals. The document also includes figures and diagrams to help illustrate the concepts.

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/25/2013

dhuha
dhuha ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

4.3

(15)

134 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Exam 2 Solutions
APPM 2350, Calculus 3, Fall 2008
October 20, 2008
1. Answers in table form: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j.
B C C D B A D B D B
Figure 1 Figure 2
(Problem 1a) (Problem 1e)
(a) The full dependency graph is given in Figure 1. Using all paths from fto vand
summing the terms from each path gives B as the answer.
(b) The equation fy= 0 must hold at a critical point by the First Derivative Test.
For this function fy=ex= 0, which does not hold for any โˆ’โˆž <x<โˆž. Thus,
the answer is C.
(c) Let g(x, y, z) = f(x, y )โˆ’z, then โˆ‡gis normal to the g= 0 level surface at any
point on the surface. In terms of f,โˆ‡g=fxi+fyjโˆ’k, so the answer is C.
(d) Let y=โˆ’xfor values of x6= 0. This function does not exist along this path,
thus, according to the definition of a multivariable limit, the limit as (x, y)โ†’
(0,0) does not exist, either. A Two Path Test is more difficult: first, consider
y=x. The limit of 2x2/x as xโ†’0 is 0. Then we must create a path that
exposes the problem in the denominator. The curve y=โˆ’x+x2is such a path.
lim
xโ†’0
x2+ (โˆ’x+x2)2
x+ (โˆ’x+x2)= lim
xโ†’0
2x2โˆ’2x3+x4
x2= lim
xโ†’0(2 โˆ’2x+x2) = 2.(1)
1
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Solutions to Exam 2, Calculus 3, APPM 2350, Fall 2008 and more Exams Advanced Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

Exam 2 Solutions

APPM 2350, Calculus 3, Fall 2008

October 20, 2008

  1. Answers in table form: a.B b.C c.C^ d.D e.B^ f.A^ g.D^ h.B i.D^ j.B

Figure 1 Figure 2 (Problem 1a) (Problem 1e)

(a) The full dependency graph is given in Figure 1. Using all paths from f to v and summing the terms from each path gives B as the answer. (b) The equation fy = 0 must hold at a critical point by the First Derivative Test. For this function fy = ex^ = 0, which does not hold for any โˆ’โˆž < x < โˆž. Thus, the answer is C. (c) Let g(x, y, z) = f (x, y) โˆ’ z, then โˆ‡g is normal to the g = 0 level surface at any point on the surface. In terms of f , โˆ‡g = fxi + fyj โˆ’ k, so the answer is C. (d) Let y = โˆ’x for values of x 6 = 0. This function does not exist along this path, thus, according to the definition of a multivariable limit, the limit as (x, y) โ†’ (0, 0) does not exist, either. A Two Path Test is more difficult: first, consider y = x. The limit of 2x^2 /x as x โ†’ 0 is 0. Then we must create a path that exposes the problem in the denominator. The curve y = โˆ’x + x^2 is such a path.

xlimโ†’ 0

x^2 + (โˆ’x + x^2 )^2 x + (โˆ’x + x^2 ) = lim xโ†’ 0

2 x^2 โˆ’ 2 x^3 + x^4 x^2 = lim xโ†’ 0 (2^ โˆ’^2 x^ +^ x

Theferore, D is the answer. (e) The integral is computed on the region in Figure 2. To integrate in y first, consider a fixed x, and then note that a vertical line enters the region at y = 0 and exits at y = x^2. The smallest x-value in the region is 0 and the largest is 1. To switch the order of integration properly, we must choose B. (f) See the box on page 960; the answer is A. (g) The linearization formula is: L(x, y) = f (1, 1) + fx(1, 1)(x โˆ’ 1) + fy(1, 1)(y โˆ’ 1). We calculate,

f (1, 1) = (1)^2 + (1)^2 + 1 = 3, fx(1, 1) = 2 x

โˆฃx=1 = 2,

fy(1, 1) = 2 y

โˆฃy=1 = 2.

Then, L(x, y) = 3 + 2(x โˆ’ 1) + 2(y โˆ’ 1), which simplifies to D.

(h) Set f (x, y) = xy, then fx = y and fy = x. The differential formula gives

df = fx dx + fy dy = y dx + x dy. (2)

Dividing by f = xy predicts the relative uncertainty: df f =^

y dx xy +^

x dy xy =^

dx x +^

dy y.^ (3) This shows that 1% uncertainty in x and y gives approximately 2% uncertainty in f ; the answer is B. (i) Set f (x, y) = x + y, then fx = 1 and fy = 1. The differential formula gives

df = fx dx + fy dy = dx + dy. (4)

Dividing by f = x + y predicts the relative uncertainty: df f =^

dx x + y +^

dy x + y =^

dx x

x x + y

dy y

y x + y

This shows that x + y very small compared to either x or y yields arbitrar- ily large uncertainty. For actual examples consider x = 101 and y = โˆ’ 100 with dx = 1, dy = โˆ’1 (approximately 1% for each). Then the relative un- certainty is predicted to be df /f = .01(101) + (โˆ’.01)(โˆ’100) = 2.01 or 201%. The same calculation for x = 100.1, y = โˆ’100, and dx = 1, dy = โˆ’1 gives df /f = .01(1001) + (โˆ’.01)(โˆ’1000) = 20.01 or 2001%. This can be generalized to arbitrary uncertainty in f , so the answer is D.

(b) From equation (iii) we see that y = โˆ’z. Using this in equation (ii) shows ฮป = 0, which plugged into equation (i) gives x = 0. Lastly, equation (iv) gives y = 1/2, so z = โˆ’ 1 /2. The unique solution to equations (i)-(iv) is { (x, y, z) =

2 ,^ โˆ’^

, ฮป = 0

(c) f (0, 1 / 2 , โˆ’ 1 /2) = 0^2 + (1/ 2 โˆ’ 1 /2)^2 = 0 is the minimum.

  1. (a) The sketch is given below:

(b) Compute the volume with an iterated integral: โˆซ โˆซ

R

f (x, y) dA =

โˆซ (^) x=

x=โˆ’ 1

(โˆซ (^) y=2โˆš 1 โˆ’x 2

y=โˆš 1 โˆ’x^2

y dy

dx =

โˆซ (^) x=

x=โˆ’ 1

y^2 2

)y=2โˆš 1 โˆ’x 2

y=โˆš 1 โˆ’x^2

dx

โˆซ (^) x=

x=โˆ’ 1

4(1 โˆ’ x^2 ) โˆ’ (1 โˆ’ x^2 )

dx

โˆซ (^) x=

x=โˆ’ 1

1 โˆ’ x^2 dx =^3 2

x โˆ’ x

3 3

)x=

x=โˆ’ 1