








Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
This is simulation experiment for Mechanics course. It is lab task report which were assigned by Prof. Bhagwan Ramanathan at Alagappa University. Its main points are: Strain, Guages, Mechanics, Elastic, Modulus, Poisson, Ratio, Stress, Concentration, Factor, Flexture
Typology: Exercises
1 / 14
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!









The objective of this experiment is to calibrate strain indicator by relating indicated strain of indicator with actual strain. For this purpose strain gauge
When a bar is pulled, it causes change in its length by ∆L, making its new length = L (original length) + ∆L (change in length). The ratio of this change in length ∆L, to the original length, L, is called strain.
The electrical strain gauges are mostly thin, rectangular-shaped strips of foil with maze-like wiring patterns on them. When the material is strained maze-like wires are either stretched slightly thinner or pushed together and become slightly thicker. Changing the width of a metal wire changes its electrical resistance. This change in resistance is proportional to the stress applied. A strain gauge takes advantage of this property. The change in the resistance is due to variation in the length and cross sectional area of the gauge wire.
Gauge factor characterizes the strain gauges in terms of its sensitivity.
“Gauge factor is defined as unit change in resistance for per Unit change in length of strain gauge wire.”
Given as G.F = (∆R/RG) / ε
Where, Δ R - the change in resistance caused by strain,
This simulator is a compact five-dial resistance decade box (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10 and 100 ohms/step), , especially for making measurements with strain gage circuitry and for calibrating strain indicators. The special feature of this simulator is very high accuracy, ±0.02% of reading at any combination of dial settings and ±0.15% for incremental changes in the 0.01 and 0.1 ohm/step decades.
There are 3 binding posts available on the V/E-40 strain gage simulator. One of these posts is marked as ground (GND). The unmarked binding posts in the following procedure will be marked as No.1 and No.2 (central post referred as post No.2).
As a precision strain gauge simulator, the v/e 40 can be used to measure non linearity of the instrumentation in quarter-bridge operation, or to verify instrument calibration over the anticipated measurement range.
This indicator is a direct readout type indicator using constant current for bridge excitation. Its range is ±1999(X1) with 1 count resolution and 19990 (X10) with 10 count resolution.
In these experiments we will be using 2 types of lead wires, short lead wires about 2 feet length (Ls), and long lead wires about 50 feet length (Ll).
Graphical Representation:
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
actual strain
indicated strain
Actual strain vs. Indicated strain
actual strain vs. indicated strain
0 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0
actual strain
indicated strain
Actual strain vs. Indicated strain
actual strain vs. indicate d strain
Experiment # 2
Lead Wire Desensitization of
Strain Indicator
Introduction: Gauge factor defined as F = (∆Rg/Rg)/ ε will give acceptable results only when resistance of lead wires are negligible. When resistance of leads is not negligible then actual resistance of the bridge arm containing the gage is Ra = Rg + Rl (1) and effective gauge factor (Fe) is Fe = (∆Rg/Ra)/ ε = [∆Rg/(Rg+ Rl)]/ ε Fe = DF (2) Where D = (Rg/(Rg+ Rl) (3) It is obvious that in the situation when Fe is to be used use of F instead of Fe will result in lower indicated strain values conveying the sense that gauge seems to be desensitized (sensing less strain). To account for this desensetization effect we are to evaluate Fe which indirectly necessitates the determination of lead wire resistance.
Part A: Procedure for Determination of Lead Wire resistance
Make quarter bridge arrngement of simulator with indicator. At R= 120ohms on simulator make active wire connection by connecting binding post No.1 on simulator to binding post S+ on indicator using short leads. Now connect binding post No. 2 on simulator to P- and D120 posts on indicator by using two common wires.
Formulas used :
D = Rg/(Rg+RLl) = 120/(120+RLl) Where RLl is the resistance of “active” long wire.
Observations and calculations: Value of simulated strain with short wires = 2000 με Value of indicatedstrain with short wires and ΔR (0.48 Ω)= 1998 με Replacing red wire at S+
Value of R’g(s) with Ll (long wire) =115.40 Ω Value of R’g(s) + RLs = 120Ω Value of RLs= 120-115.4 = 4.6Ω D = Rg/(Rg+RLl)= 120/124.6=0. Replacing black wire at S+
Value of R’g(s) with Ll (long wire) =115.42 Ω Value of R’g(s) + RLs = 120Ω Value of RLs= 120-115.42 = 4.58Ω D = Rg/(Rg+RLl)= 120/124.58=0. Replacing white wire at S+
Value of R’g(s) with Ll (long wire) =115.42 Ω Value of R’g(s) + RLs = 120Ω Value of RLs= 120-115.42 = 4.58Ω D = Rg/(Rg+RLl)= 120/124.58=0. Average value of ‘D’= 0. Value of simulated strain with long wires = 2000 με Value of indicatedstrain with long wires and ΔR (0.48 Ω)= 1923 με
Part C: Procedure for Compensation for Lead-Wire Desensitization
Procedure:
Calculate Fe = DF with D = Rg/(Rg+RLl)
Repeat steps (i), (ii) of part a but this time three Ls wires are replaced by three Ll wires with F replaced by Fe.
Corresponding to a simulated strain of 2000 με with F=2 again apply ∆R = 0. ohms and note indicated strain.
Observations and calculations: Fe = DF = (0.9632)(2) = 1.
Experiment # 3
Measurement of Installed Strain Gauge
Resistance
Nominal gauge resistance is always different from installed gauge resistance. This difference can may be due to a number of reasons. To get accurate results we are to measure the actual resistance of the installed strain gauge instead of blindly using the nominal value of uninstalled gauge in calculation.
Procedure:
Make quarter bridge arrngement of simulator with indicator. At R= 120ohms on simulator make active wire connection by connecting binding post No.1 on simulator to binding post S+ on indicator using short leads. Now connect binding post No. 2 on simulator to P- and D120 posts on indicator by using two common wires. With “Function” switch on “zero” attain zero on display by using “Instrument Zero” knob. Next placing “Function” switch on “read” get zero display with “Balance Coarse and Balance Fine”. Next function switch on “int. Cal” set the desired calibration No. corresponding to gage factor1000 for F=2, using “Span Coarse” and “Span Fine”. docsity.com
Large Strain Measurement with V/E-
Introduction:
Procedure:
Experiment # 5
Non-Linearity of Quarter Bridge Circuit
Introduction:
Part A:
Procedure: Make quarter bridge arrngement of simulator with indicator. At R= 120ohms on simulator make active wire connection by connecting binding post No.1 on simulator to binding post S+ on indicator using short leads. Now connect binding post No. 2 on simulator to P- and D120 posts on indicator by using two common wires.
Next placing “Function” switch on “read” get zero display with “Balance Coarse and Balance Fine”. Next function switch on “int. Cal” set the desired calibration No. corresponding to gage factor1000 for F=2, using “Span Coarse” and “Span Fine”.
To simulate initial resistive balance , set ∆Ri say equal to 0.6 ohm, corresponding to simulated strain of 2500 με. Observe indicated strain.
To add further 15000 με (corresponding to further ∆R = 3.6 ohm) we are to add ∆R = 3.6 ohm.
Theoretically ε = εin+ εadd = 17500 με. Observe the indicated strain. Difference is due to non-linearity.
Applied ∆R ohms
Observed strain με Calculated strain με ∆ε
0.6 2470 2500 30 2.4 9950 10000 80 3.6 14910 15000 90 4.2 17380 17500 120
Experiment # 6
Shunt Calibration of Strain Indicators
Introduction: As stated earlier calibration of the indicator means having a curve between indicated and actual (simulated) strain. We can introduce resistance change (and hence cause strain simulated) by series addition/subtraction of resistance in the form of ∆R to R (nominal value). R can also be changed by shunting R with Rc (shunt calibrated resistor). When R is shunted through Rc effective resistance of the arm becomes Reff = (RRc)/ (R+Rc) (5) Clearly Reff < R thus ∆R = [(RRc)/ (R+Rc)]- R is always negative. Therefore if shunting is done across active gage then negative strains are simulated and if shunting is done across bridge completion resistor then positive strains will be simulated. To calculate value of Rc required to simulate εs (negative strain) in the resistor R with gage factor Fi we use following relation
Rc =[ -R/(Fi εs)] – R (6)
Procedure:
Make quarter bridge arrngement of simulator with indicator. At R= 120ohms on simulator make active wire connection by connecting binding post No.1 on simulator to binding post S+ on indicator using short leads. Now connect binding post No. 2 on simulator to P- and D120 posts on indicator by using two common wires. With “Function” switch on “zero” attain zero on display by using “Instrument Zero” knob. Next placing “Function” switch on “read” get zero display with “Balance Coarse and Balance Fine”. Next function switch on “int. Cal” set the desired calibration No. corresponding to gage factor1000 for F=2, using “Span Coarse” and “Span Fine”.
To simulate εs = -1000 με, εs = -2000 με Rc values are 59,880 ohm and 29, respectively. Applying these resistors across binding posts No. 1 & 2 of the simulator one by one, note the values of indicated strains.
For producing positive simulated strain the shunt calibrated resistor may be placed across S- and D120 binding posts of the strain indicator.
RC shunt calibration resistance parallel with R (k Ω)
Observed strain με Calculated strain με
Discussion: