



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Bt Corn, a genetically modified crop infused with a gene from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacterium, was first commercialized in the Philippines in 2002. This technology helped increase the yield of corn crops and decrease pesticide use. Filipino farmers recorded a 30-50% decrease of corn borers since planting Bt corns, leading to a higher yield. The global demand for Bt corn increased by 45% from 1997 to 2020. However, the adoption of this technology has faced challenges and controversies. In this document, we explore the advantages and disadvantages of implementing Bt Corn cultivation.
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) was first isolated in 1901 by a Japanese biologist Ishiwata Shigetane as he studied the causes of a disease infecting silkworms. In 1911, Ernst Berliner re- isolated the bacterium from a flour moth caterpillar from Thuringia, Germany, hence the species name. Berliner discovered that Bt produce toxin that can be used against certain insect larvae, and not others. Despite its early discovery, Bt was not harnessed its pesticide potential not until
Bt Corn is a genetically modified corn infused with a gene that came from the said bacterium. The transgenic corn inherits the trait of the bacterium of producing an inactive protein called the Bt toxin. When insects ingested the toxin, it will be converted to its active and toxic form, Bt delta endotoxin which are highly toxic for the gut of the insect. The toxin will destroy the gut of the insect, punching holes to its walls that will be the pathway of the toxin’s spores into the insect’s internal body structure, poisoning it, that will eventually lead to its demise through septicaemia (poisoning of blood due to bacteria, causing sepsis to ensue). This toxin only kills certain taxonomic order of insect larvae, including corn borers which destroys corn crops that cause decrease in overall yield. There have been no surprising effects on non-target organisms observed with Bt maize, which confirms the specificity of the Bt proteins. Most studies suggest Bt maize has little if any impact on predators and parasitoids and, when compared with maize treated with chemical insecticides, Bt maize often results in increased biodiversity [for general reviews see (O'Callaghan et al. 2005, Romeis et al. 2008)]. Specialist insects that depend on target pests are the exception to the generalization that Bt maize does not impact non-target organisms. According to International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) director, Dr. Rhodora Aldemita, Filipino farmers recorded a 30-50% decrease of corn borers to their fields since planting Bt corns, which lead to a higher yield. This also caused decline in pesticide use. According to United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), between 1995 to 2010, the use of pesticides in the fields of Bt corns were reduced by 99%, and estimated 35% globally in the years 1996 to 2008 (Brookes and Barfoot, 2010). The transgenic form of this crop made promising results, and its use proliferated and still adopted up until this moment. According to Statista, total acreage of GMO crops in 2018 peaked at 191.7 million hectares globally. Global demand in Bt corn also increased by 45% from year 1997 to 2020 (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), 2020) Bt Corn was first introduced in the Philippines in 1996 on a limited trial basis only. Between1999 and 2002, after approval from the National Committee on Biosafety in the Philippines, field trials were conducted in the major corn-producing areas in the country. Finally, in 2002, the Philippine Department of Agriculture approved the commercial distribution of Bt corn, that made the Philippines the first country in Asia to commercialize it. Primarily in response to the Asian corn borer pests, it is expected to possibly improve corn productivity in the country since corn yields have remained low and corn imports have increased over time.
Efforts of the government towards GMO isn’t only shown in Bt corn, but also to the whole Biotechnology itself. The Scientific Revolution feedback loop stated that Science need more than just research to make progress. It depends on the mutual reinforcement of Science, Politics and Economics. The Political and Economic dimension have the power to provide for the needed resources, in return scientific researches provide new powers which they can used. Power coming from country's strong political will and commitment towards the development of Biotechnology, as well as the dedication of different institutions such as academe, is indeed crucial. Based on Padolina W. (2001), we pioneered Biotechnology research and Development program in Asia. In 1980, the National Institutes of Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology (BIOTECH) was established at the University of the Philippines in Los Baños, and later in 1997, other UP campus also organize other biotechnology research institutes in Manila, Diliman, and Iloilo. As stated in Department of Agriculture (DA) website concerning Biotechnology, we are also the first ASEAN country to initiate a Biotechnology Regulatory System mandated by Executive Order 430, allowing the creation of National Committee on Biosafety in the Philippines in 1987. This support was sustained through various presidency. Based on Panopio J. and Navarro M., President Fidel Ramos approved the Five-Year Crop Biotechnology Program comprising coconut, corn, mango and banana. In 2001, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo articulated in a policy statement that “We shall promote the safe and responsible use of modern biotechnology and its products as one of several means to achieve and sustain food security, equitable access to health services, sustainable and safe environment, and industry development.” In 2000, the DA launched the Philippine Agricultural and Fisheries Biotechnology Program aimed at putting into place policies and regulatory framework for the safe use and commercial application of biotech products in the country. Current major government funding agencies of biotechnology in the country are the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) and DA. Under DOST are Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research and Development (PCARRD), Philippine Council for Advanced Sciences Research and Development (PCASTRD), and Philippine Council for Industry and Energy Research and Development (PCIERD). On the other hand, DA’s Bureau of Agricultural Research (BAR) organized the Biotechnology RDE Network in 1999, which composed of several research institutions to implement a national agricultural biotechnology agenda and program. The Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex) is the joint FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations)/WHO (World Health Organization) intergovernmental body responsible for developing the standards, codes of practice, guidelines and recommendations that constitute the Codex Alimentarius, meaning the international food code. Codex developed principles for the human health risk analysis of GM foods in 2003. Over the years, biotech crops have been considered safe and nutritious as conventional crops, as attested by international bodies such as the World Health Organization, the Food and
Gerpacio, R.V., J.D. Labios, R.V. Labios, and E.I. Diangkinay (2004) stated that corn is known as the second most significant staple crop in our country, equivalent of 1.8 million or Filipino farmers were engaged in corn industry. Gerpacio, R.V., J.D. Labios, R.V. Labios, and E.I.Diangkinay. (2004). Maize in the Philippines: Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities.Mexico: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. Retrieved from Google Books: https://books.google.com.ph/books? hl=en&lr=&id=ApeuEAoegdsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=info:PDDFqg82CB8J:scholar.google.co m/ &ots=h7hp53qHbp&sig=CdrydeEzWTlVPajMsGDFxsEgfkM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=f alse Aldemita R. , Villena M., and James C.(2014).Biotech Corn in the Philippines: A Country Profile. Retrieved from ISAAA.ORG: https://www.google.com/url? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/ biotech_crop_profiles/biotech_corn_in_the_philippines/download/ default.asp&ved=2ahUKEwia_pLhrv3tAhVSE6YKHe8FA3AQFjABegQIAxAH&usg=AOvVa w3izIxbyqzsJ-j5oTz7xDmH Date: February 04,2020 Report Number: RP2019-0036 Report Name: Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Retrieved from USDA GAIN REPORT: https://www.google.com/url? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/ DownloadReportByFileName%3FfileName%3DAgricultural%2520Biotechnology %2520Annual_Manila_Philippines_10- 2019&ved=2ahUKEwjV2cWGr_3tAhUKq5QKHT9BD AQFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw3oqAerFUOIB-pN8i0KFBru SAFETY (HEALTH) NATIONAL: BIOSAFETY REGULATIONS IN THE PHILIPPINES: A Review of the First Fifteen Years, Preparing for the Next Fifteen Submitted by The National Academy on Science and Technology (NAST) https://www.google.com/url? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://dost-bc.dost.gov.ph/download/category/15-biosafety- regulation-in-the-philippines%3Fdownload%3D22:biosafety-regulation-in-the- philippines&ved=2ahUKEwjigfOlov3tAhWC- mEKHXGhCkMQFjALegQIHRAB&usg=AOvVaw1X6q1NjleMdqGF71Ooj8eB INTERNATIONAL: Frequently asked questions on genetically modified foods1 May 2014 | Q&AWorld Health Organization https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/FAQ-genetically-modified-foods
Agricultural Biotechnology: Opportunitiesand Challenges for the Philippines* By: WILLIAM G. PADOLINA Philippine Journal of Development Number 51, Volume XXVIII, No. 1, First Semester 2001Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/url? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/ 6506279.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiaqOr8s_3tAhVGPHAKHYQZDv0QFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOv Vaw3erIrmCTqhZNN_OiMpV-kC Drama and Communication Behind Asia’s First Commercialized Bt Corn By: Jenny A. Panopio and Mariechel J. NavarroRetrieved from: https://www.google.com/url? sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/ communication_challenges_and_convergence_in_crop_biotechnology/ default.asp&ved=2ahUKEwik4qe1tP3tAhWkNKYKHZKzA4cQFjAAegQIAxAC&usg=AOvVa w38Ah3KbL6IZbCkrDCu4q3x Evolution of the Philippine Biosafety System (DA) http://biotech.da.gov.ph
were mandated and many government bodies were established to continuously support the purpose of it in the country. Of course, there will always be opposition. Many protesters and anti-GMOs claimed that the act of gene editing in plants is like planting poison into them arguing that the gene was acquired from a virus and bacteria. Though it’s true that the trait came from one, but this argument is just practically nonsensical rants of ignorance. Over the years, biotech crops have been considered safe and nutritious as conventional crops, confirmed by numerous international bodies such as the World Health Organization, the Food and Agricultural Organization, 111 Academies of Science all over the world, American Medical Association, European Food Safety Authority, and European Commission among others. In conclusion, Bt corn and GMOs, in general, don’t pose a major threat to our health and society, rather, it is an interesting factor that might solve or alleviate the problem with food in this world of rising population. Sure, this method can still be wielded to do something negative, but arguing this is like saying that the internet is bad. It can do good, but it can do something bad too. It is just up to us, humans, whether we use it for innovation or regression. Watch these Youtube videos for further information: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH4bi60alZU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DK5kRGs0HX https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TmcXYp8xu QUESTIONS: