Lecture 9: Superposition & Time-Dependent Quantum States in Quantum Mechanics - Prof. Paul, Lab Reports of Quantum Physics

A part of a university lecture series on quantum mechanics. It covers the concepts of superposition and time-dependent quantum states, including the time-energy uncertainty principle and the evolution of wavefunctions. The lecture also includes examples and problems related to particle motion in a box and interference beats.

Typology: Lab Reports

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/16/2009

koofers-user-4pd
koofers-user-4pd šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

10 documents

1 / 34

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ā€œBut why must I treat the measuring device
classically? What will happen to me if I
don’t
??ā€
--Eugene Wigner
ā€œThere is obviously no such limitation – I can
measure the energy and look at my watch;
then I know both energy and time!ā€
--L. D. Landau, on the time-energy
uncertainty principle
ā€œWhen I hear of Schrƶdinger’s cat, I reach
for my gun.ā€ --Stephen W. Hawking
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22

Partial preview of the text

Download Lecture 9: Superposition & Time-Dependent Quantum States in Quantum Mechanics - Prof. Paul and more Lab Reports Quantum Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

ā€œBut why must I treat the measuring device

classically? What will happen to me if I don’t??ā€

--Eugene Wigner

ā€œThere is obviously no such limitation – I can

measure the energy and look at my watch;

then I know both energy and time!ā€

--L. D. Landau, on the time-energy

uncertainty principle

ā€œWhen I hear of Schrƶdinger’s cat, I reach

for my gun.ā€ --Stephen W. Hawking

Lab 3 CommentsLab 3 Comments ā€œQuantum Informationā€  One of the most modern applications of QM  quantum computing, quantum communication – cryptography, teleportation, quantum metrology  Prof. Kwiat will give an optional 214-level lecture on this topic  Sunday, March 1  3 pm, 151 Loomis

-Lab 3 meets this week. (So does Discussion, and -Lab 3 meets this week. (So does Discussion, and

there is a quiz, so don there is a quiz, so don’’t skip...)t skip...)

-If you are normally assigned to 132 Loomis, go -If you are normally assigned to 132 Loomis, go

to 257 Loomis instead. to 257 Loomis instead.

- - You will need your ā€œActive Directoryā€ Login

{www.ad.uiuc.edu}

-You can save a lot of time by reading the lab

ahead of time – it’s a tutorial on how to draw

wavefunctions

OverviewOverview

 Superposition of states and particle motion

 ā€˜Packet States’ in a Box

 Measurement in quantum physics

 Schrƶdinger’s Cat

 Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle

Time-Time-independentindependent SEQSEQ

 Up to now, we have considered quantum particles in

ā€œstationary states,ā€ and have ignored their time dependence

Remember that these special states were associated with a single energy (from solution to the SEQ)

ā€œeigenstatesā€

U=āˆž ψ(x) (^0) L U=āˆž n= n= x n= ā€œFunctions that fitā€: (Ī» = 2L/n) ψ(x) (^0) L x ā€œDoesn’t fitā€:

Lecture 9, Act iLecture 9, Act i We know that

  1. What is (-i)i? a. – i b. - c. +
  2. What is 1/i? a. – 1 b. -i c. +i
  3. What is |e iφ | 2 ? a. 0 b. e 2iφ c. 1

Lecture 9, Act iLecture 9, Act i (-i)i = -i 2 = -(-1) = + We know that

  1. What is (-i)i? a. – i b. - c. +
  2. What is 1/i? a. – 1 b. -i c. +i
  3. What is |e iφ | 2 ? a. 0 b. e 2iφ c. 1

Time-dependence of EnergyTime-dependence of Energy EigenstatesEigenstates

 Example 1: Time-evolution of an ā€œeigenstateā€

 An ā€œeigenstateā€ ψ is described by a single E, so we can write: This equation has the solution: This wavefunction has a complex time-dependence, containing ā€œiā€.

But, we are mostly interested in what we measure, often |ĪØ(x,t)|

2

As previously stated, the probability density |ĪØ(x,t)| 2 associated with eigenstates of the SEQ doesn’t change with time. Thus the name for states with well-defined energies … Stationary States ψ 0 x L

Time-dependence ofTime-dependence of SuperpositionsSuperpositions with different E with different E’’ss

 It is possible that a particle can be in a superposition of

ā€œeigenstatesā€ with different energies.  Such superpositions are also solutions of the time-dependent SEQ!  What does it mean that a particle is ā€œin two statesā€. What is its E?

Let’s see how these superpositions evolve with time.

 Consider a simple example using our trusty ā€œparticle in an

infinite square wellā€ system:

 A particle is described by a wavefunction involving a superposition of the two lowest infinite square well states (n=1 and 2)  See nice animations at http://www.falstad.com/qm1d/ U=āˆž U=āˆž ĪØ(x) (^0) L x

1

2

Particle Motion in a Box: ExampleParticle Motion in a Box: Example

 Consider the numerical example:

An electron in the infinite square well potential is initially (at t=0) confined to the left side of the well, and is described by the following wavefunction: If the well width is L = 0.5 nm, determine the time to it takes for the particle to ā€œmoveā€ to the right side of the well. |ψ (x,t 0 )|^2 U=āˆž U=āˆž (^0) L x |ψ (x,t=0)|^2 U=āˆž U=āˆž (^0) L x

Particle Motion in a Box: ExampleParticle Motion in a Box: Example

 Consider the numerical example:

An electron in the infinite square well potential is initially (at t=0) confined to the left side of the well, and is described by the following wavefunction: If the well width is L = 0.5 nm, determine the time to it takes for the particle to ā€œmoveā€ to the right side of the well. |ψ (x,t 0 )|^2 U=āˆž U=āˆž (^0) L x |ψ (x,t=0)|^2 U=āˆž U=āˆž (^0) L x period T = 1/f = 2t 0 with f = (E 2 -E 1 )/h

NormalizingNormalizing SuperpositionsSuperpositions

 It’s a mathematical fact that any two eigenstates with different eigenvalues (of any measurable, including energy) are ORTHOGONAL  Meaning:

1 2

! ( x )! ( x ) dx = 0

To normalize a superposition of normalized energy eigenstates, make the sum of the absolute squares of their coefficients equal 1. 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2

where and have different eigenvalues then

If a b

x dx a b dx a b

|a|^2 is the probability that the particle would be found in state ā€œ 1 ā€ |b|^2 is the probability that the particle would be found in state ā€œ 2 ā€ |a|^2 + |b|^2 = 1 |a| 2 and |b| 2 don’t change in time because ψ 1 and ψ 2 are energy eigenstates!

Consider a particle in an infinite potential well, which at t= 0 is in the state: with ψ 2 (x) and ψ 4 (x) both normalized.

  1. What is A 2? a. 0.5 b. 0.707 c. 0.
2. At some later time t, what is the probability density at the exact

center of the well?

a. 0 b. 1 c. It depends on the precise time t.

Lecture 9, Act 2 Lecture 9, Act 2 (^0) L x

Consider a particle in an infinite potential well, which at t= 0 is in the state: with ψ 2 (x) and ψ 4 (x) both normalized.

  1. What is A 2? a. 0.5 b. 0.707 c. 0.
2. At some later time t, what is the probability density at the exact

center of the well?

a. 0 b. 1 c. It depends on the precise time t.

Lecture 9, Act 2 Lecture 9, Act 2 In general, the probability distribution of a superposition of energy eigenstates does depend on time. However, both of these solutions always have a node at L/2. Therefore, every possible superposition of them also has a node at L/2. As stated, the question is not well posed, since A 2 could be complex. However, let’s assume that A 2 is real (or that we were asked for |A 2 |). We are told that ψ 2 (x) and ψ 4 (x) are both normalized. Therefore:

2

  • |A 2 | 2 = 1, or |A 2 | = sqrt(1 – 0.25) = sqrt(0.75) = 0. (^0) L x

Measurements of E or xMeasurements of E or x

 The important new result concerning superpositions of

energy eigenstates is that these superpositions represent

quantum particles that are moving. Consider:

 But what happens if we try to measure E on a wavefunction

which involves more than one energy?

 We can still only measure one of the allowed energies, i.e., one of the eigenstate energies (e.g., only E 1 or E 2 in ψ(x,t) above)!

 What about measurements of |Ψ(x,t)|

2 ? If we make a large # of measurements at time t, the result should look like the probability function |Ψ(x,t)| 2 at that time. If Ψ(x,t) is normalized, |A 1 | 2 and |A 2 | 2 give us the probabilities that energies E 1 and E 2 , respectively, will be measured in an experiment! |ψ (x,t)| 2 (^0) L x