



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The ordering of positive integers and the correctness of claims related to them. Part A explains why it is incorrect to claim that x√y is always irrational, while Part B explains why it is correct to claim that AB is true. explanations and examples to support these claims.
Typology: Thesis
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Task 4
Given the following: Let x and y be positive integers when completing part A. A. Explain why it is incorrect to claim that x
y is always irrational. It is incorrect to claim that x
y is always irrational because y may be a perfect square which would make the denominator an integer, or a rational number. An irrational number is one that the numbers after the decimal do not repeat or terminate. If a perfect square is a number that is the square of a whole number, then not all square roots will be irrational because the square root of a perfect square is a whole number. A whole number has a decimal that terminates, which would make it a rational number. So, if x ∧ y are both positive integers, and y is a perfect square then the number would be rational. Given: 0 < A < B, complete part B. B. Explain why it is correct to claim that AB is true. It is correct to claim that A < B
is true, because B (^) would always be larger than a B A A whole and A B would always be a fraction of a whole. If A < B , then the fraction A B will always be less than the fraction B. In the fraction A , A would be a part of the whole B , A B and when the fraction is inverted to B , then it would become an improper fraction. A
An improper fraction has a numerator that is greater than its denominator, and if B > A, then the