





Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Rocky Hiranandani gave this handout to help with Computer Security course at Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technologies. It includes: Finding, Multiplicative, Inverse, Modulo, Euclid, Cryptosystems, Greatest, Common, Divisor
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 9
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!






Fall 2006 Chris Christensen MAT/CSC 483
Finding Multiplicative Inverses Modulo n
Two unequal numbers being set out, and the less being continually subtracted in turn from the greater, if the number which is left never measures the one before it until an unit is left, the original numbers will be prime to one another. Euclid , The Elements, Book VII, Proposition 1_._
It is not necessary to do trial and error to determine the multiplicative inverse of an integer modulo n. If the modulus being used is small (like 26) there are only a few possibilities to check (26); trial and error might be a good choice. However, some modern public key cryptosystems use very large moduli and require the determination of inverses.
We will now examine a method that can be used to construct multiplicative inverses modulo n (when they exist).
Euclidean, of course, refers to the Greek mathematician Euclid (c. 325 - 265 BC).
Euclid's Elements , in addition to geometry, contains a great deal of number theory โ properties of the positive integers (whole numbers). The Euclidean algorithm is Proposition II of Book VII of Euclidโs Elements. Euclid's question was this: given two lengths (which are positive integers) what is the largest (integer) length that can be used to measure both of them? For example, if the two given lengths are 14 and 21, the largest length that measure both of them is 7; 14 is 2 ร 7 and 21 is 3 ร 7. If the two lengths are 24 and 40, the greatest common measure is 8. If the two lengths are 7 and 25, the greatest common measure is 1. Etc.
Euclid describes a process for determining the greatest common measure of two lengths. In terms of number theory, he is describing how to find what is now called the greatest common divisor (gcd) of two positive integers.
1
The Euclidean Algorithm to Find the Greatest Common Divisor
Let us begin with the two positive integers, say, 13566 and 35742.
Divide the smaller into the larger:
35742 = 2 ร 13566 + 8610
Divide the remainder (8610) into the previous divisor (35742):
13566 = 1 ร 8610 + 4956
Continue to divide remainders into previous divisors:
The process stops when the remainder is 0.
The greatest common divisor of 13566 and 35742 is 42.
gcd(13566, 35742)=42.
2
Now, we must see that it is the greatest common divisor. We do this by showing that 42 can be written in terms of 13566 and 35742 as follows:
Begin near the bottom of the divisions. Because 1050 = 4 ร 252 + 42 ,
Because 1 302 = 1 ร 1050 + 252 , 2 52 = 1 ร 1320 โ 1 ร 1050. Substitute this for 252 in the expression above for 42.
42 1 1050 4 252 42 1 1050 4 (1 1302 1 1050) 42 5 1050 4 1302
Because 3 654 = 2 ร 1302 + 1050 , 1 050 = 1 ร 3654 โ 2 ร 1302. So,
42 5 1050 4 1302 42 5 (1 3654 2 1302) 4 1302 42 5 3654 14 1302
Because 4956 = 1 ร 3654 + 1302 , 1 302 = 1 ร 4956 โ 1 ร 3654. So,
42 5 3654 14 1302 42 5 3654 14 (1 4956 1 3654) 42 19 3654 14 4956
Because 8 610 = 1 ร 4956 + 3654 , 3 654 = 1 ร 8610 โ 1 ร 4956. So,
42 19 3654 14 4956 42 19 (1 8610 1 4956) 14 4956 42 19 8610 33 4956
4
Because 1 3566 = 1 ร 8610 + 4956 , 4 956 = 1 ร 13566 โ 1 ร 8610. So,
42 19 8610 33 4956 42 19 8610 33 (1 13566 1 8610) 42 52 8610 33 13566
Because 3 5742 = 2 ร 13566 + 8610 , 8 610 = 1 ร 35742 โ 2 ร 13566. So,
42 52 8610 33 13566 42 52 (1 35742 2 13566) 33 13566 42 52 35742 137 13566
What is important here is that the gcd of 35742 and 13566 can be expressed as a combination of them by reversing the division portion of the Euclidean algorithm. So, any common divisor of 35742 and 13566 must divide the right-hand side of and, therefore, must divide
Relatively Prime
A pair of positive integers is said to be relatively prime if their greatest common divisor is 1. 3 and 5 are relatively prime because gcd(3, 5) = 1. 4 and 15 are relatively prime because gcd(4, 15) = 1. But, 6 and 33 are not relatively prime because gcd(6, 33) = 3.
5
So, 1 = 7 ร 15 โ 4 ร 26.
Finally, "go mod 26." Because 26 = 0mod 26, when we "go mod 26," the equation 1 = 7 ร 15 โ 4 ร 26 becomes the congruence1= 7 ร 15mod 26. So, the inverse of 15 modulo 26 is 7 (and the inverse of 7 modulo 26 is 15).
gcd(6, 26) = 2; 6 and 26 are not relatively prime. Therefore, 6 does not have a multiplicative inverse modulo 26. For, assume that it did; say, m is the multiplicative inverse of 6 modulo 26. Then we would have that
. This means that 6 m is equal to 1 plus a multiple of 26: 6 m = 1 + 26 k. But, 2 divides 6 and 2 divides 26; therefore, if the equation is correct, 2 divides 1. Of course, this is false; therefore, the assumption that 6 has a multiplicative inverse modulo 26 must be false. A similar argument would work for any integer that is not relatively prime to 26.
6 m = 1mod 2 6
1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25 are relatively prime to 26 and, therefore, have inverses modulo 26. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24 are not relatively prime to 26 and, therefore, do not have inverses modulo
7
Exercises
2a. gcd(6, 15) 2b. gcd(6, 16). 2c. gcd(8, 17). 2d. gcd(6, 21). 2e. gcd(15, 27).
3a. gcd(37, 3120). 3b. gcd(24, 138). 3c. gcd(12378, 3054). 3d. gcd(314, 159). 3e. gcd(306, 657).
8