THE TOKEN ECONOMY, Lecture notes of Literature

Token economies can (and should) be gradually faded and transferred to self- management programs. Myth: Token economies or not effective.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

stifler_11
stifler_11 šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§

4.6

(9)

272 documents

1 / 16

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
9/18/2019
1
THE TOKEN ECONOMY
Lisa Orsi, BA, BST, RP
Behaviour Therapist,
Complex Care & Recovery Program, CAMH
FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019
1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
•Understand what token economies are and how they work
•Think critically about your own token economies to ensure optimal effectiveness for
your clients.
•Recognize common misconceptions and be able to explain why they are
misconceptions
FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 2
WHAT IS A TOKEN ECONOMY?
•A form of contingency management that pairs an arbitrary or
neutral stimulus (tokens, points, stamps, checks, stickers…) with
established reinforcers.
•Tokens are provided immediately following targeted behaviour
(typically prosocial and adaptive behaviour) with the opportunity
to exchange for individually selected ā€œback-upā€ or ā€œsecondaryā€
reinforcers later.
FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 3
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download THE TOKEN ECONOMY and more Lecture notes Literature in PDF only on Docsity!

THE TOKEN ECONOMY

Lisa Orsi, BA, BST, RP Behaviour Therapist, Complex Care & Recovery Program, CAMH FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 (^1)

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  • Understand what token economies are and how they work
  • Think critically about your own token economies to ensure optimal effectiveness for

your clients.

  • Recognize common misconceptions and be able to explain why they are

misconceptions

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 2

WHAT IS A TOKEN ECONOMY?

  • A form of contingency management that pairs an arbitrary or
neutral stimulus (tokens, points, stamps, checks, stickers…) with
established reinforcers.
  • Tokens are provided immediately following targeted behaviour
(typically prosocial and adaptive behaviour) with the opportunity
to exchange for individually selected ā€œback-upā€ or ā€œsecondaryā€
reinforcers later.

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 3

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019^4 ā€œMOTIVATION STOREā€ ON LGUD FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 5 6

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 10 FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 11

Fact: Adults use token systems daily (money, loyalty cards, frequent flyer miles).

They are commonly used in business, healthcare, exercise programs, advertising,

gaming, and social media.

We exchange reinforcers in our interpersonal interactions every day!

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 12

…DON’T DO THIS

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 13

MISCONCEPTIONS

Myth : The benefits of token

economies do not generalize.

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 14 FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 15

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019

Fact: Five decades of research across clinical populations, target behaviours, and

geographic regions have demonstrated their effectiveness.

Tokens are always paired with social praise when increasing behaviour… always.

Eventually praise from staff can become a conditioned reinforcer.

19

APPLICATIONS

  • Increasing engagement in physical exercise for
individuals with schizophrenia (Kokaridas et al,
  • Decreasing inappropriate social behavior in
developmental disabilities (Leblanc, Hagopian, & Maglieri, 2000)
  • Classroom disruption and on-task behaviour (Doll,
Mclaughlin, & Baretto, 2013)
  • Developing self-care and life skills (Wi & Lang,
  • Treatment of aggression and self (Smith, 2017) -injury in autism
  • Reducing aggression and self inpatient units (Lepage, 1999),-injury on psychiatric
  • Improve activities of daily living (Hickey et al., 2018)
  • Increasing adherence with medical treatment
adherence (Lepage, 2003)
  • The long safety performance in open‐term effects of a token economy on‐pit mining (Fox,
Hopkins, & Anger, 1987)

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 20

UNITS WITH TOKEN ECONOMIES

3 - 5 Assessment and Triage Unit
Medium Secure Units
3 - 2 LSUA
3 - 3 LSUB
3 - 1 SOTU/ WMSU
Minimum Units
1 - 2 LGUA
1 - 3 LGUB
1 - 4 IRU
1 - 5 LGUD

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019^21

ā€œPOINT PROGRAMā€ ON LATU

PRE POST

N 53 =5% difference in group attendance
90% difference in showering daily 64% difference in clean rooms

22 FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 0

1

2

Indirectly Supervised Pass Unprompted Group Attendance Baseline Token Economy +^ Cell Phone Reminder

Independent Using a Reminder and Token Economy use of Passes and Group Attendance

Number Daily Occurrences Date 23

GROUP ATTENDANCE

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 24

MISCONCEPTIONS

Myth : Token economies do not promote person-centered treatment. FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 28 FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 29

Fact: Token system targets can be ā€œglobalā€ or highly individualized.

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 30

Unit wide programs:

  • Taking showers
  • Keeping bedroom tidy
  • Attending programming
  • Attending therapy
  • Doing exercise
Individual programs:
  • Testing blood sugar
  • Wearing clean clothes
  • Using passes / being active
  • Sitting for 15 mins. after meds
  • Using treadmill
  • Using CPAP machine
  • Using coping skills

MISCONCEPTIONS

Myth : Token economies equate to bribery and coercion. FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 31 FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 32

Fact: freedom of movement), do not require a response cost component, and provide incentives for Token economies do not restrict access to necessary items or liberties (food, clothing, linen,
behaviour that benefits the client.
Also, bribery is usually involves someone is being coerced to do something illegal and the person
offering the bribe is the one will benefit most.
Token economies can transform cultures of coercion by increasing staff success. -client interactions related to

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 33

BENEFITS

3. Reinforcement items remain effective longer!

  • Many clients will become bored with reinforcers E.g. coffee, certificates of
participation, ā€œgood jobā€.
  • Some clients may be insensitive, indifferent, or even adverse to social praise or
feedback from clinicians. ā€˜

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 37

BENEFITS

4. Token economies encourage clients to become active participants in their

care!

  • Clients may only be passively engaged in treatment, with the care team typically
taking on a large share of structuring weekly schedules and working to motivate
individuals to engage.
  • As clients are responsible for collecting, counting, and spending tokens, token

economies promote self-management, planning, and positive engagement with

staff.

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 38

BENEFITS

5. Token economies can promote positive rapport and increase the value of

social praise.

  • It provides opportunity for staff to more readily ā€œnoticeā€ gains and improvements.
People tend to like people who make them feel good about themselves 
  • It can give clients something positive to talk about with their care team. FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 39

SCORE REPORTS

40 46 24

SOCIAL VALIDITY AND CONTEXT MATTER TOO…

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 41

WHAT ARE CLIENTS SAYING?

 ā€œThe points system gives something fun and rewarding to look forward toā€
ā€œGood program to keep people doing the basics and to recoverā€
 ā€œI really like this new body wash. It makes me look forward to showering because it smells so good.ā€
 ā€œCollecting stamps is like a challenge for myself. It’s fun. I try to get more each week.ā€
 ā€œThanks for doing this. I wouldn’t get any of this stuff if you didn’t.ā€
 ā€œPoints system helps lift your mood to rewards. Plus something to look forward to and work towards. Programs like this are a life saver. Gets your mind off the rest of that stuff.ā€
 ā€œI try to get stamps so that I can get good hygiene products instead of buying cheap ones that don’t
work.ā€

FDDSS Conference on Risk & Recovery: September 18, 2019 42

  • Lin, M. F., (4), 315 - Chiou323., J. H., Chou, M. H., & Hsu, M. C. (2006). Significant experiences of token economy from the perspective of psychotic patients. Journal of Nursing , 14
  • Mcdonell management for stimulant use in community mental health patients with serious mental illness., M.G., Srebnik, D., Angelo, F., Mcpherson, S., Lowe, J.M., Sugar, A., Short, R.A., Roll, J.M., Reis, R.K. (2013). Randomized controlled trial of contingency Journal of American Psychaitry , 170 (1), 94 - 101.
  • Nelson, G., & Cone, J.D. (1979). Multiple baseline of a token economy for psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 12 (2), 255 - 271.
  • Austin Analysis , J.L., & Bevan, D. (2011). Using differential reinforcement of low rates , 44 (3), 451 - 461. to reduce children’s requests for teacher attention. Journal of Applied Behavior
  • Deitz S.M. (1977). An analysis of programming DRL schedules in educational settings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15 , 103 – 111.
  • Gaucher language and cognitive, M., Forget, J., & Clement, C. (2015 functioning on temporal regulation.). Temporal control of behaviour in children with differential reinforcement of low rates schedule: Behavioural Processes , 119 , 58 - 69. The role of age,
  • Kostinas retardation and obsessive compulsive disorder., G., Scandlen, & Luiselli, J.K. (2001). Effects Behavioral interventions of DRL and DRL combined with response cost on perseverative verbal behavior of an adult with mental, 16 , 27 - 37.
  • Turner head injured man., J. M., Green, G., Behavioral Braunling Residential Treatment - McMorrow, D. (1990). Differential reinforcement of low rates of responding (DRL) to reduce dysfunctional social behaviors of a , 5 (1), 15-27. 46