Thick Description: An Approach to Cultural Analysis by Clifford Geertz, Exams of Anthropology

Thick description is an approach to cultural analysis popularized by anthropologist clifford geertz. This method involves densely textured descriptions and explanations of social acts and activities to uncover the layers of cultural significance underlying them. Geertz's work helped usher in a new generation of ethnographers who championed more literary approaches to ethnographic writing and analysis. This entry expands on the notion of thick description through its initial articulation by philosopher gilbert ryle, debates and criticisms surrounding geertz's application, and its significance and legacy.

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

jackie4
jackie4 🇨🇦

4.6

(19)

262 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
860
Thick
Ue•;cnnti<)n
See also
C;eertz,
Clifford;
Hymes, l)ell;
ROheim,
c;eza;
Turner,
Victor
W.
Further Readings
Olson, C. (1966). Projective verse. In
R.
Creeley (Ed.),
Selected writings (pp.
15~26).
New York,
NY:
New
Direc~ions.
!Original
work
published 1950)
Tedlock,
B.
(1982). Time and the highland
:vfaya.
Albuquerque~
University of New
~fexico.
--.
( 1987).
Dreaming:
Anthropological and
psychological interpretations. Cambridge,
UK:
(~ambridge
University
Press.
--.
(1992).
The
beautiful and
the
dangerous:
Encounters
with
the
Zuni
Indians.
New York,
NY:
Viking.
--.
(2005)/Woman in the shaman's body. New York,
NY:
Bantam.
Tedlock,
B.,
& Tedlock,
D.
!Eds.).
(1975).
Teachings
of
the American
earth:
Indian
religion
and philosophy.
New
York,
NY:
Liveright.
Tedlock,
D. (Ed.). (1972). Finding the
center:
Narrative
poetry
of
the
Zuni
Indians.
New
York,
NY:
Dial
Press.
--.
(1983). The spoken word and the work
of
interpretation.
Philadelphia:
University
of
Pennsylvania
Press.
--.
(1985). The Papal
Vuh:
The Mayan book
of
the
dawn
of
life.
New
York,
NY:
Simon &
Schuster.
--.
(2003
).
Rabina/ A
chi:
A
Mayan
drama
of
war and
sacrifice.
()xford~
UK:
Oxford University Press.
--.
(2010). 2000
ye,1rs
of
Mayan
literature. Berkeley:
lJniversity
of
California
Press.
THICK DESCRIPTION
Thick description
is
an
approach
to
cultural analysis
popularized by the anthropologist Clifford Geertz
in the introductory essay
of
his
1973
book The
Interpretation
of
Cultures. This method involves
densely textured descriptions
and
explanations
of
social acts
and
activities, which strive
to
uncover
the layers
of
cultural significance underlying them.
This effort
by
social researchers to construct actor·
oriented understandings
of
meaning
is
necessarily
interpretive. Geertz's position that ethnography (cui-
tural anthropology's principal method
of
inquiry)
is
fundamentally a project
of
thick description and his
definition
of
culture (anthropology's chief organiz-
co:nce:otl
as of
s1gmt1rca11ce
description a more
or
complete
of
anthropologists
should
do--that
is, endeavor to identify and represent the
cultural contexts in which behaviors
and
the mean·
ings behind them are embedded in order
to
figure
out
what
people are really
up
to.
Cultural
anthro·
pologists today recognize Geertz's articulation
of
thick description as a seminal
moment
in debates
over the discipline's position as closer
to
either the
social sciences
or
the humanities. Geertz's
work
also
helped usher in the
next
generation
of
ethnogra·
phers who championed more literary approaches
to
ethnographic writing and analysis. The remainder
of
this entry expands
on
the notion
of
thick description
through
(a)
a brief overview
of
its initial articula-
tion
by
the philosopher Gilbert Ryle, (b) a discussion
of
the debates
and
criticisms surrounding Geertz's
application
of
thick description, and
(c)
an
elabora·
tion
on
its significance and legacy.
Gilbert Ryle and Thick Description
Although Geertz introduced tbick description as
an
important concept in anthropology, he in fact bor·
rowed
both
the term
and
the best
known
exam-
ple for explaining it from the
Oxford
philosopher
Gilbert Ryle.
Through
a series
of
thought exercises,
Ryle juxtaposed the idea
of
a
"thin
description"-
that
is, a surface-level explanation
of
a directly
observable
act-with
a "thick description," which
additionally presents the intentions of social actors
as well as the reasons for and meanings behind their
behavior. The most famous
of
these exercises consid-
ers the thinly described contracting of
au
eyelid
as
either
an
involuntary twitch
or
an
intentional wink.
Ryle demonstrates
that
a contracting eyelid only
becomes recognizable
and
understood as a wink
with an awareness
of
the cultural context and cir·
cumstance--both the social codes through which a
wink rakes
on
meaning and the various situations
that might prompt its
use.
Methodologically, this dis·
tinction highlights the importance
of
ethnographic
embeddedness. In other words, simply being present
to observe and record an act will
not
suffice--anv
video camera can document a contracting eyelid;
th~
researcher must be familiar enough with the social
environment
to
(at least attempt to) understand the
meanings
that
actors attribute
to
their actions.
Criticisms
of
Thick
Description
Jescriptir>n prirnarily
Cf>me
two
camps. Anthropologists
to
more
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Thick Description: An Approach to Cultural Analysis by Clifford Geertz and more Exams Anthropology in PDF only on Docsity!

860 Thick Ue•;cnnti<)n

See also C;eertz, Clifford; Hymes, l)ell; ROheim, c;eza; Turner, Victor W.

Further Readings

Olson, C. (1966). Projective verse. In R. Creeley (Ed.), Selected writings (pp. 15~26). New York, NY: New Direc~ions. !Original work published 1950) Tedlock, B. (1982). Time and the highland :vfaya. Albuquerque~ University of New ~fexico. --. (1987). Dreaming: Anthropological and psychological interpretations. Cambridge, UK: (~ambridge University Press. --. (1992). The beautiful and the dangerous: Encounters with the Zuni Indians. New York, NY: Viking. --. (2005)/Woman in the shaman's body. New York, NY: Bantam. Tedlock, B., & Tedlock, D. !Eds.). (1975). Teachings of the American earth: Indian religion and philosophy. New York, NY: Liveright. Tedlock, D. (Ed.). (1972). Finding the center: Narrative poetry of the Zuni Indians. New York, NY: Dial Press. --. (1983). The spoken word and the work of interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. --. (1985). The Papal Vuh: The Mayan book of the dawn of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. --. (2003 ). Rabina/ Achi: A Mayan drama of war and sacrifice. ()xford~ UK: Oxford University Press. --. (2010). 2000 ye,1rs of Mayan literature. Berkeley: lJniversity of California Press.

THICK DESCRIPTION

Thick description is an approach to cultural analysis popularized by the anthropologist Clifford Geertz

in the introductory essay of his 1973 book The

Interpretation of Cultures. This method involves densely textured descriptions and explanations of social acts and activities, which strive to uncover the layers of cultural significance underlying them. This effort by social researchers to construct actor· oriented understandings of meaning is necessarily interpretive. Geertz's position that ethnography (cui- tural anthropology's principal method of inquiry) is fundamentally a project of thick description and his definition of culture (anthropology's chief organiz- co:nce:otl as of s1gmt1rca11ce description a more or complete of anthropologists should

do--that is, endeavor to identify and represent the cultural contexts in which behaviors and the mean· ings behind them are embedded in order to figure out what people are really up to. Cultural anthro· pologists today recognize Geertz's articulation of thick description as a seminal moment in debates over the discipline's position as closer to either the social sciences or the humanities. Geertz's work also helped usher in the next generation of ethnogra· phers who championed more literary approaches to ethnographic writing and analysis. The remainder of this entry expands on the notion of thick description through (a) a brief overview of its initial articula- tion by the philosopher Gilbert Ryle, (b) a discussion of the debates and criticisms surrounding Geertz's application of thick description, and (c) an elabora· tion on its significance and legacy.

Gilbert Ryle and Thick Description Although Geertz introduced tbick description as an important concept in anthropology, he in fact bor· rowed both the term and the best known exam- ple for explaining it from the Oxford philosopher Gilbert Ryle. Through a series of thought exercises, Ryle juxtaposed the idea of a "thin description"- that is, a surface-level explanation of a directly observable act-with a "thick description," which additionally presents the intentions of social actors as well as the reasons for and meanings behind their behavior. The most famous of these exercises consid- ers the thinly described contracting of au eyelid as either an involuntary twitch or an intentional wink. Ryle demonstrates that a contracting eyelid only becomes recognizable and understood as a wink with an awareness of the cultural context and cir· cumstance--both the social codes through which a wink rakes on meaning and the various situations that might prompt its use. Methodologically, this dis· tinction highlights the importance of ethnographic embeddedness. In other words, simply being present to observe and record an act will not suffice--anv video camera can document a contracting eyelid; th~ researcher must be familiar enough with the social environment to (at least attempt to) understand the meanings that actors attribute to their actions.

Criticisms of Thick Description

Jescriptir>n prirnarily Cf>me two camps. Anthropologists to more

Torres Straits Expedition 86 l

objective social scientific principles see Geertz as attempting to thrust social inquiry into an inter-

pretive quagmire. For example, positivists such as

Paul Shankman and materialists like Marvin Harris view thick description's lack of systematic ana- lytical rigor as a form of anything-goes relativism and regard Geertz's thickly descriptive writing as excessively wordy ivory tower musings that don't say much of anything and make little to no effort to address the pressing issues facing contemporary society. On the other hand, researchers predisposed to an interpretive approach, including postmodem- ists like Vincent Crapanzano and Graham Watson, cite a number of ambiguities and/or contradictions in Geertz's explanation of thick description and how to go about doing it. One common source of con- fusion concerns the relationship between describ- ing and explaining. Although scholars frequently reference "tbick description" to mean the former, as an approach to cultural analysis it is incomplete without the latter. Explaining the circumstances, intentions, and meanings behind a wink may seem straightforward enougb. However, for more elabo- rate cross-cultural situations-including most of the concrete examples of thick-description-at-work offered by Geertz-sorting out the layers of signifi- cance underlying different actors' ac'tions and moti- vations involves a considerable imaginative leap. While Geertz appears comfortable in moving from descriptive accounts of cultural contexts to diagnos- tic understandings of the frames of interpretation that guide social actors' bebaviors, critics sucb as Crapanzano argue tbat his explanations are often too neat to account for the inherent contradictions and tensions of lived reality and, furthermore, lack sufficient evidence for how he reaches his interpre- tive conclusions. To this end, Crapanzano charac- terizes Geertz's writing as deliberately illusive and perpetually inconclusive. Another ambiguity sur- rounds the difference between describing/explaining particular situations and generating knowledge

abont either the broader society or social life on the

whole. Geertz clearly promotes thick description as an effort toward cultural theory building ratber rhan a means of studying parricular places. Yet, as such, he advocates for the intrinsically unfinisbed nature of cultnral analysis, arguing that the aim of (inter-

are mr·vitAhlv 11nn"rilv11hle regarding the nature of

Thick description, which came of age during a particularly acrimonious moment in anthropology, was unquestionably introduced in response ro the scientific models that dominated the discipline dur- ing tbe 1950s and 1960s. It in mm influenced a generation of social researchers--within anthropol- ogy and beyond----suspicious of hard (social science) facts and dedicated to more literary approaches to ethnographic representations. This postmodern rum in anthropology, which reached its apex in the mid- ro late 1990s, moved from a Geertzian understand- ing of social life as a text to be read and interpreted by researchers to the position that ethnographers not only describe/explain but, in facr, construct cnlture through the process of writing about it-advocating for a cultural anthropology that is very much akin to literary scholarship. Such attention to issues of writing and representation marked a monumental shift that, in chorus with important critiques com- ing from feminist and native anthropology, trans- formed the discipline dnring the final decades of the 20th century. As such, many contemporary anthro- pologists view Geertz's articulation of thick descrip- tion as a tnming point in repositioning anthropology closer to the humanities. Anthony Kwame Harrison

S'ee also c;eertz, Clifford; Hermeneutics~ I--fu1n~u1istic Anthropology; Postmodernism; Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology

Further Readings

Geertz, (~. ( 1973 ). The interpretation ol cultures.

New York, NY Basic Books. ~Iammersley, M. (2008). ()n thick description: Interpreting Clifford Geertz. ln M. Hammersley !Ed.), Questioning qualitative inquiry: Critical essays (pp. 52-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ryle, G. ( 1971). Tbe thinking of thoughts: What is "Le Penseur'' doing? In G. Ryle (Ed.}, C:ollected papers: VoL 2. Collected essays 1929-1968 ipp. 4811-496). London, UK: t1utchinson.

TORRES STRAITS EXPEDITION

:m·al!rs was an m development British anthropology,