




























































































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The Orange County Mexican Mafia, also known as “La Eme” ... person, group, or entire gang on the green light list. Those who.
Typology: Slides
1 / 106
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!





























































































April 2021 Grand Jury UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHNNY MARTINEZ, aka “Crow,” aka “Gumdrop,” ROBERT AGUIRRE, aka “Rob,” DENNIS ORTIZ, aka “Woody,” aka “Socrates,” OMAR MEJIA, aka “Cruz,” aka “Rascal,” MIGUEL JOSE ALVARADO, aka “Grumpy,” LUIS HERIBERTO VASQUEZ, aka “Moss,” aka “Little Shooter,” aka “Shooter,” MICHAEL COOPER, aka “Shaggy,” GREGORY MUNOZ, aka “Louie,” aka “Louis,” aka “Snoopy,” aka “Snoop,”
No. 8:22-cr-00034(A)-CJC F I R S T S U P E R S E D I N G I N D I C T M E N T [18 U.S.C. § 1962(d): Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. §§ 1959(a)(1), (3), (5), (6): Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity; 21 U.S.C. § 846: Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine and Heroin; 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii), (b)(1)(B)(i), (b)(1)(B)(viii), (b)(1)(C): Distribution of and Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine and Heroin; 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i), (ii), (iii), (j)(1): Using and Carrying a Firearm During and in Relation to, and Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of, a Crime of Violence, and Brandish and Discharge of a Firearm, Resulting in Death; 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1): Felon in Possession of Firearms
DVE
aka “Abe,” aka “Grumpy,” ROBERT MARTINEZ, aka “Lil Rob,” aka “Blacky,” BRENDA VANESSA CAMPOS MARTINEZ, aka “Miss V,” aka “Vanessa,” DANIELLE CANALES, YSRAEL JACOB CORDOVA, aka “Trips,” aka “Trippy,” RICARDO VALENZUELA, aka “Solo,” KEVIN TREJO, aka “Minor,” JAMES MENDEZ, aka “Lil Buck,” aka “Buck,” MIKE ESCOBAR, aka “Risky,” FRANK MOSQUEDA, aka “Demon,” aka “Pride,” MHER DARBINYAN, aka “Hollywood Mike”, ROBERT AMEZCUA, aka “Flaco,” JONATHAN MARTINEZ, aka “Fabian,” aka “Peanut,” ALEX GONZALEZ, aka “Hitman,” aka “Hector,” ROBERTO ZAYAS, aka “Midnight,” SAUL HERERRA, aka “Sinner,” MARK COOPER, aka “Reckless,” ORLANDO ARBALLO, aka “KO,” MEGAN MORENO,
and Ammunition; 18 U.S.C. § 1963, 21 U.S.C. § 853, 18 U.S.C. § 924(d), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c): Criminal Forfeiture]
Mexican Mafia operated in the Central District of California and elsewhere. Members of the OC Mexican Mafia were referred to as “Carnales” or “brothers.” To become a brother, a gang member must have a distinguished reputation for “putting in work” on behalf of the OC Mexican Mafia, meaning the gang member had murdered or assaulted enemies and rivals of the OC Mexican Mafia. Prospective members were expected to provide financial assistance to OC Mexican Mafia members, and to follow the OC Mexican Mafia’s rules governing the streets and correctional institutions.
carry out the orders of the OC Mexican Mafia member in control of their neighborhood and custody facility, because “doing work” for the OC Mexican Mafia increased their status and reputation. Some gangs included in their name the number “13,” denoting the letter “M,” or “eme” in Spanish, in order to demonstrate their loyalty and allegiance to the OC Mexican Mafia.
within the prison system might be divided among different members of the OC Mexican Mafia.
the OC Mexican Mafia member in charge of the facility. The Mesa could include the shot-caller for that facility. If the shot-caller was not on the Mesa, the Mesa would report directly to the shot- caller acting on behalf of the OC Mexican Mafia brother.
result. Only members of the OC Mexican Mafia were able to put a person, group, or entire gang on the green light list. Those who were put on a green light list could be removed by the payment of a significant fine or an agreement to put in work for the enterprise, such as committing a violent act. Failure to pay monthly respects could result in a whole gang receiving a greenlight, meaning that all members of the gang were subjected to assaults by OC Mexican Mafia members and associates, until the respects were paid.
Secretaries were treated as respected criminal figures by members of street gangs controlled by and affiliated with the OC Mexican Mafia.
facilities, and the extortion of others engaged in the distribution of controlled substances and other crimes in Orange County and within Orange County correctional facilities; c. Promoting and enhancing the Enterprise and the activities of its leaders, members, and associates, by, among other things, engaging in murder, extortion, drug trafficking, and other criminal activities; d. Engaging in extortion and drug trafficking as a means to generate income for the Enterprise; e. Punishing Enterprise members and associates who did not comply with the rules and orders of the Enterprise, including those who cooperated with law enforcement; f. Keeping victims, potential victims, and community members in fear of the Enterprise through violence and threats of violence; g. Hindering, obstructing, and preventing law enforcement officers from identifying participants in the Enterprise’s criminal activities, from apprehending the perpetrators of those crimes, and from prosecuting and punishing the offenders. D. MEANS AND METHODS OF THE ENTERPRISE
a. To generate income, members and associates of the Enterprise engaged in illegal activities under the protection of the Enterprise, including drug trafficking within Orange County correctional facilities and in Orange County neighborhoods, taxing drug dealers operating in neighborhoods controlled by the Enterprise, extorting inmates by taxing in-custody criminal activity, collecting respects from Hispanic street gangs under the control of the Enterprise, and other criminal conduct. b. To enforce discipline within the Enterprise, members and associates of the Enterprise punished errant members and associates for violations of the OC Mexican Mafia’s rules. Discipline ranged from a fine or an assault to being placed on the “green light” list, whereupon the “greenlighted” individual could be murdered on behalf of the Enterprise. c. To identify persons in bad standing, coordinate the movement of drugs and communications in prison, and conduct other Enterprise business, members and associates of the OC Mexican Mafia kept track of Southern California Hispanic gang members through lists known as “roll calls,” which were made to keep track of every Sureño in a particular module or dorm of a jail or prison. Such lists often included the Sureño’s name, booking number, next court date, gang, and/or moniker. d. To facilitate and maintain control of criminal activities in areas controlled by the Enterprise, both inside and outside of correctional facilities, members and associates of the
e. Multiple acts indictable under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951 (relating to interfering with commerce by robbery and extortion). It was further part of the conspiracy that each defendant agreed that a conspirator would commit at least two acts of racketeering activity in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise. F. OVERT ACTS
Overt Act No. 8: On or about March 28, 2017, defendant MARTINEZ ordered that OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise member Munoz be removed from his position as a shot-caller with the OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise. Overt Act No. 9: On or about March 28, 2017, as a result of defendant MARTINEZ’s order, OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise associates known to the Grand Jury assaulted OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise member Munoz while he was in custody in Calipatria State Prison, causing bodily injury to Munoz. Overt Act No. 10: On or about April 6, 2017, OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise associates known to the Grand Jury used handmade weapons to assault OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise member Munoz while he was in custody in Calipatria State Prison, causing serious bodily injury to Munoz’s head and ear. This assault occurred as a result of defendant MARTINEZ’s order to remove Munoz as a shot-caller with the OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise. Overt Act No. 11: Between on or about April 17, 2017 through on or about April 25, 2017, defendants MARTINEZ and GUARJARDO, and others known to the Grand Jury, discussed and agreed to sell approximately three ounces of heroin for $2,000. Overt Act No. 12: On or about April 17, 2017, defendant GUARJARDO contacted a person he believed to be a methamphetamine buyer, but who was in fact a confidential informant working with law enforcement (“CI-1”), to set up a sale of three ounces of heroin for $2,000.
Overt Act No. 13: On or about April 18, 2017, in a series of telephone calls, defendant GUARJARDO advised CI-1 that defendant MARTINEZ was setting up the heroin deal, confirmed that it would cost $2,000 for three ounces of heroin, and discussed how much CI-1 would need to pay in “tax” from the drug sale to defendants MARTINEZ and AGUIRRE. Overt Act No. 14: On or about April 21, 2017, defendant GUARJARDO contacted CI-1 to advise that defendant MARTINEZ texted that the heroin deal would proceed. Several minutes later, CI- received a telephone call from OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise associate Lorraine Robles (“Robles”) to arrange a meeting location for the heroin deal. Overt Act No. 15: On or about April 21, 2017, OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise associate Robles, acting on behalf of an individual known to the Grand Jury, sold approximately 46.6 grams of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of heroin to CI-1 in exchange for $1,400. Overt Act No. 16: During the heroin deal on April 21, 2017, defendant GUARJARDO spoke with OC Mexican Mafia Enterprise associate Robles via telephone to advise that defendant MARTINEZ had arranged for three ounces of heroin, not two. Overt Act No. 17: Between on or about April 21, 2017 through on or about May 13, 2017, defendants MARTINEZ, GUARJARDO, and CAMPOS, and others known to the Grand Jury, attempted to extort $800 in the form of “respects” and “taxes” from CI-1, whom the defendants