



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Usos de Raman Spectroscopy.pdf
Typology: Summaries
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




he counterfeiting of commercial products such as clothing items, hand bags, and movies is an ever-increasing worldwide problem. However, the risk to the public health from purchas- ing a counterfeit hand bag is minimal compared to the risk associated with a consumer purchasing and consuming a counterfeit pharmaceu- tical product. The increase in the counterfeiting of pharmaceutical drugs worldwide is of major concern to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [1]. Counterfeit pharmaceuticals pose a significant public health and safety risk since they may contain harmful impurities, may be inef- fective, and/or have low to no bioavailability. Counterfeit pharma- ceuticals may include products that may have the correct ingredients, wrong ingredients, incorrect quantities of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), as well as fake packaging. Evidence analyzed by the FDA’s Forensic Chemistry Center (FCC) submitted as part of counterfeit investigations has included pharmaceuticals, dietary sup- plements, cosmetics, and even medical devices. In recent cases, well- organized counterfeiters have become more sophisticated in both the manufacture and distribution of the counterfeit product. Therefore, where many of these counterfeit products were previously found and purchased on the black market and the internet, they are now finding their way into the legal distribution chain [2]. In countries outside the U.S., drug counterfeiting is widespread, and in some cases, may account for more than 50 % of the products sold in those markets [1]. The number of counterfeit investigations conducted by the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigation (OCI) has increased from five per year in the late 1990’s to over 20 per year since 2000 [1]. The FDA’s Forensic Chemistry Center (FCC) provides forensic analysis of evi- dence collected as part of OCI’s counterfeit investigations. The type of analysis the FCC performs on suspect counterfeit products includes screening or rapid analysis of products to sort legitimate product from suspect counterfeit products. The screening of suspect counterfeit products also generates chemical information which can be used to determine the potential public health risk. Additionally, the
FCC may generate forensic information related to the source or ori- gin of a counterfeit product, for example, how do similar counterfeits relate to each other? The FCC uses a wide range of analytical methods and instrumental techniques in the screening and sourcing of suspect counterfeit and adulterated pharmaceuticals. An instrumental technique used fre- quently in the analysis of suspect counterfeit product evidence is Raman spectroscopy. Raman spectroscopy is used to perform a vari- ety of analyses in the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in forensic analysis [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The vibrational spectroscopic information obtained from a forensic sample using Raman spectroscopy is com- plimentary to the infrared (IR) spectroscopic information that may be obtained for the same forensic sample. However, the inherent instru- mental and sampling advantages of Raman versus IR spectroscopy in some cases, makes Raman a better choice in the analysis of counter- feit and suspect adulterated pharmaceuticals [3,4,5]. Raman spectroscopy provides specific information on the identifi- cation of analytes, characterization of sample matrices, and molecu- lar spectroscopic information useful in the structural elucidation of unknowns [3,4]. The technique is rapid and when coupled with sam- ple preparation methodologies (i.e., micro-extractions, fraction col- lections, small particle analysis), a large amount of information can be obtained from a single piece of forensic evidence. This paper focuses specifically on the Raman spectroscopic analy- sis of suspect counterfeit tablets as an example, although the same sample preparations and Raman spectroscopic measurements can be applied to suspect counterfeit capsule formulations and to adulterated pharmaceutical products.
All Raman spectra presented and discussed in this paper were col- lected on a research grade dispersive Raman spectrometer system with both micro- and macro-sampling capabilities. The Raman spec-
trometer system consists of two lasers (633nm and 785 nm), two grat- ings (high and low resolution) and a CCD detector. The data collec- tion parameters for all the Raman spectral data presented are given in Table 1.
The optical microscope attached to the system allows for samples to be visually observed using transmitted, episcopic and/or plane polarized light. The Raman spectrometer system is also coupled with a Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) attenuated total reflectance (ATR) microscope, allowing FT-IR spectroscopic measurements to be made on the same sample.
A pharmaceutical dosage form, such as a tablet, is frequently composed of a coating and a core. The tablet coating can consist of organic components (cel- lulose, wax, stearates), inorganic com- ponents (silicates, TiO 2 ), and possibly a color component (dye). The tablet core consists of an API, fillers (cellulose, lac- tose), flow agents (talc, stearates) and disintegrates [10,11]. Depending on the dosage form being analyzed, the API concentration can range from micro- gram (ug) to gram (gm) quantitities. The variety of dosage formulations, as well as API concentrations that are currently marketed by numerous pharmaceutical companies, provides a unique challenge to the FCC in forensic analysis of sus- pect counterfeit products. Therefore, a multidisplinary approach is necessary to gather as much information as possible about a suspect or authentic pharmaceu- tical dosage form as part of an investiga- tion. Solid-state analysis is an important part of this multidisplinary approach and Raman spectroscopy is a key instrumental technique used in the analysis of suspect counter- feit products. In the analysis of suspect counterfeit pharmaceutical dosage forms, Raman spectroscopy has advantages over other instrumental tech- niques. Raman allows for the qualitative identification of both API’s and excipients used to manufacture the product [6,7,8,9]. It should be noted, however, that in some cases pharmaceutical excipients exhibit a weak Raman response and/or may exhibit a large amount of fluo- rescence. For this reason, both FT-IR and Raman spectroscopies are used at the FCC when determining the excipients used in suspect counterfeit dosage formulations (Figure 1). Figure 1 is a comparison
of the FT-IR attenuated total reflectance (ATR) spectrum and Raman spectrum collected of the same tablet coating. There are significant differences observed between the two spectra in Figure 1. In the FT-IR ATR spectrum (Figure 1a), the main features observed are attributed to the organic components of the coating (e.g., cellulose) and in the Raman spectrum (Figure 1b) the main features observed are attributed to the inorganic components (e.g., titanium dioxide) of the coating material. Raman spectroscopy allows for chemical information to be obtained in the spectral region below 600 cm-^. This region is very useful for the determination of inorganic com- pounds. The combination of techniques can provide for a complete spectral “snap shot” of the components used in the tablet coating and core formulation. The Raman spectra collected of an authentic tablet coating and core can be used as a “spectral fingerprint” in the comparison of the authentic to a suspect counterfeit product. Figure 2 is a comparison of the Raman spectrum of an authentic tablet coating (Figure 2b) compared to the Raman spectrum of a suspect counterfeit tablet coat- ing (Figure 2a). Raman spectra of the tablet coatings were obtained directly from the tablets with no sample preparation. The tablets under investigation were placed directly on the Raman microscope stage and the 633 nm laser was focused on the tablet coating. The major spectral features observed in both spectra are due to titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ). However, upon further visual comparison of the spec- tral data in Figure 2 (see insert), an additional peak is observed in the
Raman spectrum of the suspect tablet coating that is not observed in the authentic product tablet coating. Figure 3 is a comparison of the Raman spectrum of an authentic tablet core (Figure 3b) and the Raman spectrum of a suspect tablet core (Figure 3a). Raman spectra of the tablet cores were obtained by removing a portion of the tablet coating and then cross-sectioning the tablet core. The cross-section was then placed flat on a glass slide and the 633 nm laser focused on the tablet core. The suspect counterfeit tablet core (Figure 3a) exhibits differences at ~ 400 cm-1^ , 1100 cm- and 1400 cm-1, which are not observed in the Raman spectrum of the authentic tablet core (Figure 3b). The Raman spectrum of the suspect counterfeit tablet core can be used to verify the presence of the API
Data Collection Parameter Setting Laser 633 nm Confocal Hole 800 um Slit Width 200 um Grating 950 l/mm Integration time 10 to 20 sec averaged 2X Focusing objective 50X Detector CCD
Figure 1. (a) FT-IR ATR spectrum of a tablet coating (b) Raman spectrum of the same tablet coating
In addition to physical separation of the tablet core components, micro-extractions can be used to isolate the API from the tablet core formulation. When using micro-extractions, care should be taken to compare the Raman spectrum of the extracted API from the tablet core to the Raman spectrum of the extracted/re-crystallized API stan- dard using the same solvent system. This must be done to avoid mis- identifications due to the possible formation of different polymorphic forms of the API due to the solvent used in the extraction. Micro-extractions allow for small amounts of material to be analyzed when evidence is limited. When dealing with small amounts of material and low levels of API, sensitivity of the Raman measurement may become an issue. In tradi- tional micro-extractions, a small amount of solvent (200 ul - 1ml) may be placed on a glass slide and/or small watch glass as the solvent evaporates the dried material forms residue "rings" (Figure 6A). In this case, the amount of material to be analyzed is dispersed over a relatively large area making it difficult to determine a good sampling area. Recently, coated metal substrates have become available which allow the concentration of small amounts of extracted material [16,17]. The nature of coating allows for the surface tension of the droplet to be maintained while the solvent evaporates (Figure 6b). The dried residue is then a concentrated spot of material which is ideal for measurement using Raman microscopy. Instead of the 200 ul - 1ml deposition, now volumes as low as 20 ul can be deposited and Raman spectra obtained of the dried material. Figure 6c is the Raman spectrum of a 10 ul droplet (~0.4 ug of API) deposited on a slide and dried compared to the Raman spectrum of powdered neat standard of the API (Figure 6d). Good agreement is observed between the Raman spectra of the dried material versus the API standard Raman spectrum. However, minor differences are noted in the Raman spectrum in Figure 6c due to different crys- tallization conditions between the extracted material and neat powdered API.
Raman spectroscopy is a powerful instrumental technique used in the analy- sis of suspect counterfeit pharmaceutical dosage forms. The technique provides fundamental spectroscopic information on the API as well as excipients used in specific pharmaceutical formulations, and when combined with FT-IR can pro- vide a complete spectral “snap shot”. In most cases, using Raman based analysis, sample preparation is minimal, and when coupled with polarized light microscopy, physical separation of different particles can aid in the analysis of the pharmaceu- tical formulation. The use of modified metal substrates with micro-extractions allows for small amounts of material to be isolated and analyzed using Raman microscopy.
Mr. Fred Fricke, Dr. Duane Satzger and Mr. John Crowe, for helpful review of this paper. Mr. John Crowe for useful discussions and help with the optical microscopy work discussed in this paper.
The mentioning of specific products/ instruments in this presenta- tion is for information purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement by either the Food and Drug Administration and/or the Forensic Chemistry Center.
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectrum of a suspect counterfeit tablet core (b) Raman spectrum of the API standard. Peaks used for comparison are marked with arrows
Figure 5. (a) Photomicrograph of API polymorphic form 1 (b) Photomicrograph of API polymorphic form 2 (c) Comparison of the Raman spectra of API polymorphic form 1 to form 2
1. Combating Counterfeit Drugs A Report of the Food and Drug Administration: 2004 U.S. Department of Health and Human _Services. Food and Drug Administration.
Dr. Mark Witkowski received a Bachelor of Science (BS) degree in chemistry from the University of Pittsburgh in 1988 and a Ph.D. in analytical chemistry under the direction of Dr. William G. Fateley from Kansas State in 1992. Dr. Witkowski held a Post Doc position at D.O.M. Associates International Inc. in Manhattan Kansas from 1992 to 1994. In 1994, he joined Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company. He joined the FDA's Forensic Chemistry Center in 2000 as a specialist in vibrational spectroscopy. Currently, he is the team leader for the vibrational spectroscopy laboratory; which is responsible for performing FT-IR, Raman and micro analytical analysis of case work involving counterfeit pharmaceuticals, tampered / adulter- ated food and pharmaceutical products, trace evidence and other forensic type samples. He is an associate member, crimi- nalistic section, of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences and a member of the Society of Applied Spectroscopy.
Author correspondence should be addressed to: [email protected]
Figure 6. (a) Photomicrograph of dried extract residue on a glass slide (b) Photograph of a dried extract on a modified metal substrate (c) Raman spectrum of ~0.4 ug of drug API deposited on a modified metal sub- strate (d) Raman spectrum of the API powder standard