Validation tool for questionnaire, Thesis of Technical English

To validate questionnaire in a research

Typology: Thesis

2023/2024

Uploaded on 01/27/2024

ricah-navarro-1
ricah-navarro-1 🇵🇭

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
APPENDIX F
VALIDATION INSTRUMENT
Name of Evaluator: __________________________________________________
Position: ___________________________________________________________
Institution: _________________________________________________________
Educational Attainment: _____________________________________________
Directions: To establish the validity of the instrument, you are requested to encircle the
appropriate number that reflects your rating. When needed, you may write comments
and suggestions to improve its validity.
SCALE VERBAL DESCRIPTION
5Very Highly
Valid
The instrument is very highly valid. It provides unbiased data,
allowing 0-5% error
4Highly Valid The questionnaire is highly valid. It provides unbiased data. Allowing
6-10% error.
3Moderately
Valid
The questionnaire is moderately valid. It provides unbiased data,
allowing 11-15% error.
2 Less Valid The questionnaire is less valid. It provides unbiased data, allowing
16-20% error.
1 Not Valid The questionnaire is not valid. It provides biased data, allowing 21%
or more error.
appropriateness
CRITERIA RATING
1. Appropriateness of Scale
The scale of the instrument is appropriate in measuring each item. 5 4 3 2 1
2. Suitability of Items
The concepts, vocabulary, and structure are suitable to the level of the
respondents.
5 4 3 2 1
3. Relevance of Items
The items are appropriate to the variables of the study that can
measure what intends to measure.
5 4 3 2 1
4. Clarity of Direction
The direction or content of the instrument is easy to understand.
5 4 3 2 1
5. Adequateness of Items
The number of items is adequate to represent the coverage of the
research or study.
5 4 3 2 1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Validation tool for questionnaire and more Thesis Technical English in PDF only on Docsity!

APPENDIX F

VALIDATION INSTRUMENT

Name of Evaluator: __________________________________________________ Position: ___________________________________________________________ Institution: _________________________________________________________ Educational Attainment: _____________________________________________ Directions: To establish the validity of the instrument, you are requested to encircle the appropriate number that reflects your rating. When needed, you may write comments and suggestions to improve its validity. SCALE VERBAL DESCRIPTION 5 Very Highly Valid The instrument is very highly valid. It provides unbiased data, allowing 0-5% error 4 Highly Valid The questionnaire is highly valid. It provides unbiased data. Allowing 6-10% error. 3 Moderately Valid The questionnaire is moderately valid. It provides unbiased data, allowing 11-15% error. 2 Less Valid The questionnaire is less valid. It provides unbiased data, allowing 16-20% error. 1 Not Valid The questionnaire is not valid. It provides biased data, allowing 21% or more error. appropriateness CRITERIA RATING

1. Appropriateness of Scale The scale of the instrument is appropriate in measuring each item.

2. Suitability of Items The concepts, vocabulary, and structure are suitable to the level of the respondents.

3. Relevance of Items The items are appropriate to the variables of the study that can measure what intends to measure.

4. Clarity of Direction The direction or content of the instrument is easy to understand.

5. Adequateness of Items The number of items is adequate to represent the coverage of the research or study.

6. Organization The items are clearly framed and are organized logically.

7. Objectivity The instrument can be used as a tool for gathering factual data that is free from biases and subjectivity.

8. Comprehensiveness The instrument can generate comprehensive information within the given time frame.

9. Data Generation The instrument can be used as a tool to generate data that are valuable to the given research theme.

10. Attainment of Purpose In general, the instrument serves the purpose for which it is constructed.

Source: Robles (2019) Development and Validation of Educational Video Tutorials for 21st Century Secondary Learners COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS: