Understanding Residency and Personal Jurisdiction of Corporations in Civil Actions, Slides of Civil procedure

An analysis of section 1391 of the united states code, focusing on the venue and residency requirements for corporations in civil actions. It covers the concept of an entity's capacity to sue and be sued, the rules for multiple district states, and examples of venue and jurisdiction in various cases. Additionally, it discusses defenses, pre-answer motions, and the federal rules of civil procedure related to these topics.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/30/2013

divit
divit 🇮🇳

4.2

(18)

133 documents

1 / 27

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Sec. 1391. - Venue generally
(b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be
brought in--
(1) a judicial district in which any defendant
resides, if all defendants are residents of the
State in which the district is located;
(2) a judicial district in which a substantial
part of the events or omissions giving rise to
the claim occurred, or a substantial part of
property that is the subject of the action is
situated;
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b

Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding Residency and Personal Jurisdiction of Corporations in Civil Actions and more Slides Civil procedure in PDF only on Docsity!

Sec. 1391. - Venue generally

(b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be

brought in--

(1) a judicial district in which any defendant

resides, if all defendants are residents of the

State in which the district is located;

(2) a judicial district in which a substantial

part of the events or omissions giving rise to

the claim occurred, or a substantial part of

property that is the subject of the action is

situated;

Corporate residence:

§ 1391(c)(2) an entity with the capacity to sue and be sued in its common name under applicable law, whether or not incorporated, shall be deemed to reside, if a defendant, in any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to the civil action in question

P (S.F. – N.D. Cal.) sues the D1 Corp. & the

D2 Corp.

Suit is a Cal. State law breach of contract

action concerning a contract signed in San

Francisco for the construction of a hospital

in Albany (N.D.N.Y.)

D1 Corp. built foundation; D2 Corp. built

structure

D1 Corp. incorporated in New York; main

office in NYC (S.D.N.Y.)

D2 Corp. incorporated in Delaware (D. Del.);

main office in Pittsburgh (W.D. Pa.) Docsity.com

1391(b)(3) if there is no district in

which an action may otherwise be

brought as provided in this section,

any judicial district in which any

defendant is subject to the court's

personal jurisdiction with respect to

such action.

Defenses

1) PJ, SMJ, venue, service, process

2) failure to state a claim

3) negative defenses

4) affirmative defenses

pre-answer motions

answers

No defense or objection is waived

by joining it with one or more other

defenses or objections in a

responsive pleading or in a motion.

12(e) Motion for a More Definite Statement. A party may move for a more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed but which is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response. The motion must be made before filing a responsive pleading and must point out the defects complained of and the details desired. If the court orders a more definite statement and the order is not obeyed within 14 days after notice of the order or within the time the court sets, the court may strike the pleading or issue any other appropriate order.

  • P sues D for breach of contract
  • D answers
  • D’s answer includes the affirmative defense of

laches, which is an equitable doctrine barring

stale claims, similar to a statute of limitations for

actions at law

  • Laches applies only to equitable actions

P’s action is an action at law and is inside the

statute of limitation

  • P wants to remove this silly affirmative defense

from consideration

pleadings

FRCP 12(a) Time to Serve a Responsive Pleading. (1) In General. Unless another time is specified by this rule or a federal statute, the time for serving a responsive pleading is as follows: (A) A defendant must serve an answer: (i) within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or (ii) if it has timely waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent... (B) A party must serve an answer to a counterclaim or crossclaim within 21 days after being served with the pleading that states the counterclaim or crossclaim. (C) A party must serve a reply to an answer within 21 days after being served with an order to reply, unless the order specifies a different time.

FRCP 8(b) Defenses; Admissions and

Denials.

(1) In General. In responding to a

pleading, a party must:

(A) state in short and plain terms

its defenses to each claim asserted

against it; and

(B) admit or deny the allegations

asserted against it by an opposing

party.

http://msgre2.people.wm.edu/Co

mplaintAnswer.pdf