


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
The purpose of a visual analysis is to recognize and understand the visual choices the artist made in creating the artwork. By observing and writing about ...
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Definition of genre
Visual analysis is the basic unit of art historical writing. Sources as varied as art magazines, scholarly books, and undergraduate research papers rely on concise and detailed visual analyses. You may encounter a visual analysis as an assignment itself; or you may write one as part of a longer research paper.
The purpose of a visual analysis is to recognize and understand the visual choices the artist made in creating the artwork. By observing and writing about separate parts of the art object, you will come to a better understanding of the art object as a whole.
A visual analysis addresses an artwork’s formal elements—visual attributes such as color, line, texture, and size. A visual analysis may also include historical context or interpretations of meaning.
Be sure to read the assignment carefully to decide which elements of visual analysis your professor expects you to include. Some professors will look for a formal analysis alone; others will expect you to frame your formal description in terms of historical information. You may be asked to offer one or more interpretations of the possible meanings of the work. If necessary, ask your professor or T.A. to clarify expectations for the assignment.
Actions to Take
To write a visual analysis, you must look closely at an art object—or at a photograph of an art object— and translate your visual observations into written text. However, a visual analysis does not simply record your observations. It also makes a claim about the work of art.
Observe the artwork and write down your observations. Be precise. Consider the composition, colors, textures, size, space, and other visual and material attributes of the artwork. Go beyond your first impressions. This should take some time—allow your eye to absorb the image. Making a sketch of the work can help you understand its visual logic.
Formulate a main claim. Your claim might do one of the following:
o Reflect on the overall organization of the work of art, e.g. “Paul Cézanne’s Mont Sainte- Victoire [Figure 1] is composed of a number of repeated shapes and lines that serve to unify the composition.”^1
(^1) Henry M. Sayre, Writing about Art (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005) 58.
Figure 1 : Paul Cézanne, Mont Sainte-Victoire (1885-7)
o Consider how formal elements impact the meaning of the artwork, e.g. “Rembrandt’s use of chiaroscuro heightens the sense of drama in The Night Watch [Figure 2].” o Relate this work relates to other works you have studied, considering how is it similar to and different from these objects, e.g. “This Egyptian sculpture combines a highly conventional symmetrical style with mild asymmetry and a degree of realism [Figure 3].”^2
Support your main claim with visual details.
o Analyze the form of the artwork: line, color, shape, texture, and material are good places to start. o Target your description. Address only those elements relevant to your main claim. o Organize your observations in a logical order. You might, for example, follow a line through the painting, moving from the background to the foreground, or from left to right. Consider beginning with composition and moving to material, or vice versa. Many approaches are possible; choose a structure that makes sense for your main claim. In the following example, the author introduces the subject of the painting and then describes the figure’s posture, gestures, and clothing: “Elongated and spectral, the figure of an older man is seated at a table, painted red. He leans far to the left. His narrow head is propped upon a skeletal fist; his other hand lies, its fingers slightly spread, open on the table’s edge. He is wearing a cream-colored cap and a dark blue jacket [Figure 4].”^3
(^2) Sylvan Barnet, A Short Guide to Writing about Art (New York: Longman, 1997) 79. (^3) Cynthia Saltzman, Portrait of Dr. Gachet: The Story of a van Gogh Masterpiece. Money, Politics, Collectors,
Greed, and Loss (New York: Penguin, 1998), xv.
Figure 2 : Rembrandt, The Company of Frans Banning Cocq and Willem van Ruytenburch (The Night Watch) (1642)
Figure 3 : Ka-aper (c 2500- 2400 BCE)
http://twp.duke.edu/uploads/media_items/overview-vis.original.pdf Visual Rhetoric/Visual Literacy: Writing about Paintings http://twp.duke.edu/uploads/media_items/painting.original.pdf Visual Rhetoric/Visual Literacy: Writing about Photographs http://twp.duke.edu/uploads/media_items/photography
Helpful Books
Suzanne Hudson and Nancy Noonan-Morrissey, The Art of Writing about Art (Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning, 2002). Henry M. Sayre, Writing about Art (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005). Amy Tucker, Visual Literacy: Writing about Art (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001).
Figure 6 : The Code of Hammurabi (c. 1792-1750 BCE) Figure 7:^ Robert Adam,^ Kenwood:^ Middlesex Library^ (^1767 -^9 )