










































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Visual Methods, Beyond Talk and Text, Research Methods, Ontology, Epistemology, Gain Knowledge, Actually Answering, Get Acknowledged, Over Simplify Reality, Brought Back are some points of this lecture.
Typology: Slides
1 / 50
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!











































● Thinking about research methods always involves
thinking about what the world is like, and about how we can gain knowledge of it:
Ontology – What is the world like? What is real?
Epistemology – How can we gain knowledge of the world?
● When we make decisions about what research methods
to use we are actually answering these questions, perhaps without realising.
■ One ‘reduction’ of reality that social science has often been accused of is a reduction to language.
■ It sometimes seems as though social life consists only of what is spoken or written , as most methods rely mainly upon what people say.
■ But what about the ‘data’ of the other senses?
■ What of sight, smell, touch and hearing – are these forms of experience reducible to language?
If not, then why are they so often neglected by our social research methods?
● E.g. is our social world exclusively linguistic? Or is it also
material and sensory , and therefore visual?
● Isn’t our visual perception
shaped by our culture and society? And aren’t our social actions partly shaped by our visual experience?
● Therefore, aren’t the visual
dimensions of our lives socially significant?
The argument: visual data can help to make social science less dependent upon language.
So visual perception is a social as well as a physical phenomenon.
On this basis one can imagine a ‘sociology of eye contact’,or even a ‘sociology of smiles’,
i.e. Social relationships can be analysed in terms of the visual aspects of social interaction.
John Berger (1972) – ‘Ways of Seeing’
● “Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognizes before it can speak. But there is another sense in which seeing comes before words. It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world… The way we see things is affected by what we know or believe.”
● Berger argues that ‘ways of seeing’ are socially conditioned – our perception depends upon our social existence. What we see depends upon what we are (i.e. how we live).
Walter Benjamin (1936) – ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’
● “During long periods of history, the mode of human sense-perception changes with humanity’s entire mode of existence. The manner in which human sense- perception is organized, the medium in which it is accomplished, is determined not only by nature but by historical circumstances as well.”
What is Visual Sociology?
● Until recently visual sociology was a marginal sub-field of sociology, largely detached from the mainstream.
● But the broadening of visual sociology beyond the study of images (as part of the ‘sensory turn’) has reconnected it to the core questions of sociology.
● “Ideas about display, status and interaction allow us to tap into the rich vein of Goffmanian interactionism. Ideas about surveillance, visibility and privacy bring to mind Elias and Foucault. Readings of objects, buildings and places allow reference to Levi-Strauss on nature/culture or to postmodern theory on architecture, and so on.” (Emmison and Smith 2000, ix).
■ Visual sociology is more than just the study of photographs and images. (Emmison and Smith 2000, ix).
■ The sociological study of ‘the
seen and the observable’. i.e. the whole field of visual experience.
■ This would include:
● objects ● buildings ● interiors ● environments ● bodies and movements ● as well as 2-dimensional images.
■ Therefore ‘the visual’ links: ► the body and senses ► space and materiality ► culture and meaning
► Historical sociologists point to the key role of writing and printing press in the emergence of bureaucratic industrial societies (Benedict Anderson, 1991).
► Some have suggested that if writing was fundamental to modern society, then visual images are fundamental in post-modern society.
► According to the sociologist Scott Lash (1988) the ‘cultural logic’ of post-modernity has seen a heightened visual sensibility replace a literary/textual one.
■ Scott Lash claims that we now live in what he calls an ‘image-based’ culture founded on ‘spectacle’.
■ ‘Spectacle’ = forceful visual impacts upon the human consciousness.
■ These are different in nature from the meanings mediated through language.
The argument: Images have replaced texts as the dominant cultural form in contemporary societies.
… the importance of ‘the Visual’
2. The Ontological Argument:
► Suggests that the Visual has always been central to social life and to human cultures.
► Anthropological studies of traditional societies have shown the key role of visual communication in practices of ritual, symbolism, totemism, and everyday life.
► Richard Sennett (1977) has shown that the public life of early modern Europe was dominated by visible markers of identity, status and belief , in the form of clothing, make-up and insignia.
► It can also be argued that sociology has always incorporated elements of visual analysis, often without acknowledging it.
► Some examples:
● Georg Simmel’s (1921) sociological phenomenology of the modern city.
● Dick Hebdige (1979) ‘Subculture: The Meaning of Style’.
● Erving Goffman (1979) ‘Gender Advertisements’.
● Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of ‘Habitus’.
► So ‘the visual’ is of tremendous significance in social life and social research, but what is ‘visual data’ and how can we make sense of it?
What is Visual Data?
● Until fairly recently ‘visual data’
essentially meant photographs , and ‘visual methods’ meant the use of photographs in social research.
● But there have recently been
influential attempts to broaden the definition of visual data and visual research.
Emmison and Smith (2000, 107) have argued that ‘visual research must break free from the tyranny of the photograph’.
They suggest that ‘visual data’ encompasses
‘the whole field of the seen and the observed’.
On this broad definition, ‘visual data’ could include: