

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Problem sets from massachusetts institute of technology (mit) department of civil and environmental engineering for two different topics. The first topic is about the steady state diffusion of methane in anaerobic sediments. It includes a sketch and governing pde for methane diffusion, steady state concentration distribution solution, and discussion on calculating methane flux and its practical value. The second topic is about a dye tracing experiment in a lake to characterize the advection and diffusion characteristics. It involves checking dye conservation, determining radial diffusivity as a function of time, and finding the detectable area of the patch as a function of time and its undetectable time.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 1.77 Water Quality Control
Problem Set 2 Spring 2006 Due March 2
C 6 H 12 O 6 NH 3 => 3CH 4 + 3CO 2 + NH 3
Assume that methane is produced continuously and uniformly within the anaerobic sediment layer at a constant rate SM (mg/l-day), i.e., a “zero order” reaction.
a) Make a sketch and write the governing PDE for the steady state diffusion of methane upward to the sediment-water interface. Assume that the concentration of methane at the sediment-water interface is zero, due to the rapid oxidation of methane at the interface, and that at a depth L, of the order 50 cm, the sediment is saturated with methane at concentration co.
b) Solve for the steady state concentration distribution of methane in the sediment in the region z = 0, at the sediment interface, to z = L.
c) Discuss how you would calculate the flux of methane at the sediment-water interface. What practical value would such a calculation have?
You realize that before much can be accomplished, it is necessary to get a handle on the advection and diffusion characteristics of the lake, and therefore a small experiment has been designed. First, the temperature profile of the lake was measured in order to determine the depth of the thermocline (Figure 1). Next, 300 kg of Rhodamine WT, a fluorescent dye, was injected uniformly over the epilimnion in a time span of several minutes. Then a small launch was used to crisscross the patch of diffusing dye, which moved with the lake currents as shown in Figure 2. While traversing the plume, a small pump discharged lake water through a calibrated onboard fluorometer. Isoquants of dye (ppb) are show in Figure 2.
The above procedure was followed three times after the dye release—at times of 7, 10 and 13 hours. Thus, three plots of dye concentration, similar to that shown in Figure 2, were obtained. Since we wish to get a quick estimate of the horizontal eddy diffusivity, the data were analyzed by converting the areas within the individual isoquants of the skewed patch into “equivalent circular areas” of radius r. The result is the data shown in Table I, which for the three different times shows concentration as a function of the square of the “equivalent radius” r^2.
Perform the following analysis of the data:
a) Check to see if the dye is conserved
b) Determine the radial diffusivity, Er, as a function of time.
c) Let cT be a threshold diffusivity, i.e., a minimum detectable value of c (assume cT = 1 ppb). Find an expression for the detectable area of the patch as a function of time. Also determine at which time the patch will no longer be detectable.
Table 1
Time (hours) Concentration (ppb) (Equivalent radius)^2 r^2 (m^2 ) 7 20 0.10 x 10^6 10 0.30 x 10^6 2.5 0.90 x 10^6 1.0 1.10 x 10^6
10 10 0.10 x 10^6 6.0 0.62 x 10^6 1.5 1.24 x 10^6 1.0 1.96 x 10^6
13 7.0 0.09 x 10^6 5.0 0.51 x 10^6 2.0 1.29 x 10^6 1.0 2.40 x 10^6