Weak Convergence - Mathematical Statistics | STAT 709, Study notes of Mathematical Statistics

Material Type: Notes; Class: Mathematical Statistics; Subject: STATISTICS; University: University of Wisconsin - Madison; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/02/2009

koofers-user-3pg
koofers-user-3pg 🇺🇸

5

(1)

9 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Leture 13: Weak onvergene
A sequene
f
P
n
g
of probability measures on (
R
k
;
B
k
) is
tight
if for every
>
0, there is a
ompat set
C
R
k
suh that inf
n
P
n
(
C
)
>
1
.
If
f
X
n
g
is a sequene of random
k
-vetors, then the tightness of
f
P
X
n
g
is the same as the
boundedness of
fk
X
n
kg
in probability (
k
X
n
k
=
O
p
(1)).
Proposition 1.17.
Let
f
P
n
g
be a sequene of probability measures on (
R
k
;
B
k
).
(i) Tightness of
f
P
n
g
is a neessary and suÆient ondition that for every subsequene
f
P
n
i
g
there exists a further subsequene
f
P
n
j
g f
P
n
i
g
and a probability measure
P
on (
R
k
;
B
k
)
suh that
P
n
j
!
w
P
as
j
! 1
.
(ii) If
f
P
n
g
is tight and if eah subsequene that onverges weakly at all onverges to the
same probability measure
P
, then
P
n
!
w
P
.
The proof an be found in Billingsley (1986, pp. 392-395).
The following result gives some useful suÆient and neessary onditions for onvergene in
distribution.
Theorem 1.9.
Let
X; X
1
; X
2
;:::
be random
k
-vetors.
(i)
X
n
!
d
X
is equivalent to any one of the following onditions:
(a)
E
[
h
(
X
n
)℄
!
E
[
h
(
X
)℄ for every bounded ontinuous funtion
h
;
(b) lim sup
n
P
X
n
(
C
)
P
X
(
C
) for any losed set
C
R
k
;
() lim inf
n
P
X
n
(
O
)
P
X
(
O
) for any open set
O
R
k
.
(ii) (Levy-Cramer ontinuity theorem). Let
X
;
X
1
;
X
2
; :::
be the h.f.'s of
X; X
1
; X
2
; :::
,
respetively.
X
n
!
d
X
if and only if lim
n
!1
X
n
(
t
) =
X
(
t
) for all
t
2 R
k
.
(iii) (Cramer-Wold devie).
X
n
!
d
X
if and only if
X
n
!
d
X
for every
2 R
k
.
Proof.
(i) First, we show
X
n
!
d
X
implies (a). By Theorem 1.8(iv) (Skorohod's theorem),
there exists a sequene of random vetors
f
Y
n
g
and a random vetor
Y
suh that
P
Y
n
=
P
X
n
for all
n
,
P
Y
=
P
X
and
Y
n
!
a:s:
Y
. For bounded ontinuous
h
,
h
(
Y
n
)
!
a:s:
h
(
Y
) and, by the
dominated onvergene theorem,
E
[
h
(
Y
n
)℄
!
E
[
h
(
Y
)℄. Then (a) follows from
E
[
h
(
X
n
)℄ =
E
[
h
(
Y
n
)℄ for all
n
and
E
[
h
(
X
)℄ =
E
[
h
(
Y
)℄.
Next, we show (a) implies (b). Let
C
be a losed set and
f
C
(
x
) = inf
fk
x
y
k
:
y
2
C
g
.
Then
f
C
is ontinuous. For
j
= 1
;
2
; :::
, dene
'
j
(
t
) =
I
(
1
;
0℄
+ (1
jt
)
I
(0
;j
1
. Then
h
j
(
x
) =
'
j
(
f
C
(
x
)) is ontinuous and b ounded,
h
j
h
j
+1
,
j
= 1
;
2
; :::
, and
h
j
(
x
)
!
I
C
(
x
) as
j
! 1
. Hene lim sup
n
P
X
n
(
C
)
lim
n
!1
E
[
h
j
(
X
n
)℄ =
E
[
h
j
(
X
)℄ for eah
j
(by (a)). By
the dominated onvergene theorem,
E
[
h
j
(
X
)℄
!
E
[
I
C
(
X
)℄ =
P
X
(
C
). This proves (b).
For any open set
O
,
O
is losed. Hene, (b) is equivalent to (). Now, we show (b)
and () imply
X
n
!
d
X
. For
x
= (
x
1
; :::; x
k
)
2 R
k
, let (
1
; x
= (
1
; x
1
(
1
; x
k
and (
1
; x
) = (
1
; x
1
)
(
1
; x
k
). From (b) and (),
P
X
((
1
; x
))
lim inf
n
P
X
n
((
1
; x
))
lim inf
n
F
X
n
(
x
)
lim sup
n
F
X
n
(
x
) = lim sup
n
P
X
n
((
1
; x
℄)
P
X
((
1
; x
℄) =
F
X
(
x
). If
x
is a ontinuity point of
F
X
, then
P
X
((
1
; x
)) =
F
X
(
x
). This
proves
X
n
!
d
X
and ompletes the pro of of (i).
(ii) From (a) of part (i),
X
n
!
d
X
implies
X
n
(
t
)
!
X
(
t
), sine
e
p
1
t
x
= os(
t
x
) +
p
1 sin(
t
x
) and os(
t
x
) and sin(
t
x
) are bounded ontinuous funtions for any xed
t
.
1
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Weak Convergence - Mathematical Statistics | STAT 709 and more Study notes Mathematical Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

Le ture 13: Weak onvergen e

A sequen e fP n

g of probability measures on (R

k

; B

k

) is tight if for every  > 0, there is a

ompa t set C  R

k

su h that inf n

P

n

(C ) > 1 .

If fX n g is a sequen e of random k -ve tors, then the tightness of fP X n

g is the same as the

b oundedness of fkX n

kg in probability (kX n

k = O p

Prop osition 1.17. Let fP n g b e a sequen e of probability measures on (R

k

; B

k

(i) Tightness of fP n

g is a ne essary and suÆ ient ondition that for every subsequen e fP n i

g

there exists a further subsequen e fP n j

g  fP n i

g and a probability measure P on (R

k

; B

k

)

su h that P n j

w

P as j! 1.

(ii) If fP n

g is tight and if ea h subsequen e that onverges weakly at all onverges to the

same probability measure P , then P n

w

P.

The pro of an b e found in Billingsley (1986, pp. 392-395).

The following result gives some useful suÆ ient and ne essary onditions for onvergen e in

distribution.

Theorem 1.9. Let X ; X 1

; X

; : : : b e random k -ve tors.

(i) X n

d

X is equivalent to any one of the following onditions:

(a) E [h(X n

)℄! E [h(X )℄ for every b ounded ontinuous fun tion h;

(b) lim sup n

P

X

n

(C )  P

X

(C ) for any losed set C  R

k

;

( ) lim inf n

P

X

n

(O )  P

X

(O ) for any op en set O  R

k

(ii) (Levy-Cramer ontinuity theorem). Let  X

X

X

; ::: b e the h.f.'s of X ; X 1

; X

resp e tively. X n

d

X if and only if lim n!

X

n

(t) =  X

(t) for all t 2 R

k

.

(iii) (Cramer-Wold devi e). X n

d

X if and only if

X

n

d

X for every 2 R

k

.

Pro of. (i) First, we show X n

d

X implies (a). By Theorem 1.8(iv) (Skoroho d's theorem),

there exists a sequen e of random ve tors fY n

g and a random ve tor Y su h that P Y n

= P

X

n

for all n, P Y

= P

X

and Y n

a:s:

Y. For b ounded ontinuous h, h(Y n

a:s:

h(Y ) and, by the

dominated onvergen e theorem, E [h(Y n )℄! E [h(Y )℄. Then (a) follows from E [h(X n

E [h(Y n

)℄ for all n and E [h(X )℄ = E [h(Y )℄.

Next, we show (a) implies (b). Let C b e a losed set and f C (x) = inf fkx y k : y 2 C g.

Then f C

is ontinuous. For j = 1 ; 2 ; :::, de ne ' j

(t) = I (1;0℄

  • (1 j t)I (0;j

. Then

h j (x) = ' j (f C (x)) is ontinuous and b ounded, h j  h j + , j = 1 ; 2 ; :::, and h j (x)! I C (x) as

j! 1. Hen e lim sup n

P

X

n

(C )  lim n!

E [h j

(X

n

)℄ = E [h j

(X )℄ for ea h j (by (a)). By

the dominated onvergen e theorem, E [h j

(X )℄! E [I

C

(X )℄ = P

X

(C ). This proves (b).

For any op en set O , O is losed. Hen e, (b) is equivalent to ( ). Now, we show (b)

and ( ) imply X n

d

X. For x = (x 1

; :::; x k

) 2 R

k

, let (1; x℄ = (1; x 1

(1; x k

℄ and (1; x) = (1; x 1

)      (1; x k

). From (b) and ( ), P X

((1; x)) 

lim inf n

P

X

n

((1; x))  lim inf n

F

X

n

(x)  lim sup n

F

X

n

(x) = lim sup n

P

X

n

((1; x℄) 

P

X

((1; x℄) = F X

(x). If x is a ontinuity p oint of F X

, then P X

((1; x)) = F X

(x). This

proves X n

d

X and ompletes the pro of of (i).

(ii) From (a) of part (i), X n

d

X implies  Xn

(t)!  X

(t), sin e e

p

1 t

x

= os (t

x) +

p

1 sin(t

x) and os(t

x) and sin(t

x) are b ounded ontinuous fun tions for any xed t.

Supp ose now that k = 1 and that  X n

(t)!  X

(t) for every t 2 R.

We want to show that fP X n

g is tight. By Fubini's theorem,

u

Z

u

u

[1 

X

n

(t)℄dt =

Z

u

Z

u

u

(1 e

p

1 tx

)dt

dP X n

(x)

Z

sin ux

ux

dP X n

(x)

Z

fjxj> 2 u

g

juxj

dP X n

(x)

 P

X

n

(1; 2 u

) [ (2u

for any u > 0. Sin e  X

is ontinuous at 0 and  X

(0) = 1, for any  > 0 there is a u > 0 su h

that u

R

u

u

[1 

X

(t)℄dt < =2. Sin e  X n

X

, by the dominated onvergen e theorem,

sup n

fu

R

u

u

[1 

X

n

(t)℄dtg < . Hen e,

inf

n

P

X

n

[ 2 u

; 2 u

 1 sup

n

u

Z

u

u

[1 

X

n

(t)℄dt

i.e., fP X n

g is tight.

Let fP X nj

g b e any subsequen e that onverges to a probability measure P.

By the rst part of the pro of,  X nj

! , whi h is the h.f. of P.

By the onvergen e of  X n

X

. By the uniqueness theorem, P = P X

By Prop osition 1.17(ii), X n

d

X.

Consider now the ase where k  2 and  X n

X

Let Y nj b e the j th omp onent of X n and Y j b e the j th omp onent of X.

Then  Y nj

Y

j

for ea h j.

By the pro of for the ase of k = 1, Y nj

d

Y

j

By Prop osition 1.17(i), fP Y nj

g is tight, j = 1 ; :::; k. This implies that fP X n

g is tight (why?).

Then the pro of for X n

d

X is the same as that for the ase of k = 1.

(iii) Note that 

X

n

(u) =  X n

(u ) and 

X

(u) =  X

(u ) for any u 2 R and any 2 R

k

.

Hen e, onvergen e of  X n

to  X

is equivalent to onvergen e of   X n

to   X

for every

2 R

k

. Then the result follows from part (ii).

Example 1.28. Let X 1

; :::; X

n

b e indep endent random variables having a ommon .d.f.

and T n

= X

+    + X

n

, n = 1 ; 2 ; :::. Supp ose that E jX 1

j < 1. It follows from a result in

al ulus that the h.f. of X 1

satis es

X

(t) =  X 1

p

1 t + o(jtj)

as jtj! 0, where  = E X 1

. Then, the h.f. of T n =n is

T

n =n

(t) =

X

t

n

n

p

1 t

n

  • o

t

n

#n

for any t 2 R, as n! 1. Sin e (1 + n

=n)

n

! e for any omplex sequen e f n

g satisfying

n

! , we obtain that  T n =n

(t)! e

p

1 t

, whi h is the h.f. of the distribution degenerated