Week 3: Collaboration Cafe, Assignments of Nursing

Week 3: Collaboration Cafe - Screening for suicidal thoughts and behaviors in older adults in the emergency department (ED).

Typology: Assignments

2021/2022

Uploaded on 01/26/2024

patricha-daley
patricha-daley 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Study: Patient Opinions about Screening for Suicide Risk in the Adult Medical
Inpatient Unit
Purpose of Study: This analysis aimed to describe adult patients' opinions of
suicide risk screening in medical settings. A 15-item feedback survey was
given verbally by the Q’em data collector to all patients who participated in
the QIP, showing that patient opinions can be utilized to inform the
thoughtful implementation of universal suicide risk screening in the medical
setting. Therefore, settings that treat medically ill patients represent an
important venue for suicide detection and prevention.
Research Design: Analysis includes a subsample of a larger quality
improvement project designed to screen medically hospitalized patients for
suicide risk.
Discussion of the Sample: A convenience sample of 56 adult medical/surgical
patients, age 18 years or older, who were admitted to one of three select
inpatient units at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Research
Center (CRC) during a single week in January 2012, were included in this sub-
analysis. The NIH CRC is a 200-bed clinical research hospital. Patients were
excluded if they could not communicate fluently in English, were cognitively
impaired, or were experiencing acute worsening medical status.
Discussion of data collection Methods: Responses to open-ended questions
were transcribed verbatim and uploaded into NVivo 9.2 qualitative software
for coding and content analysis. A group composed of a masters-level clinical
social worker, a research assistant, and an advanced doctoral clinical
psychology student used grounded theory and open coding, a technique of
naming and categorizing phenomena, to analyze the responses. Two team
members used the open coding procedure to code the comments and
identify themes from the answers. A third coder reviewed the responses and
discussed with the team to further refine themes. Eleven themes were
established. A constant comparison method was used to refine the codes
into larger themes. Interrater agreement was 90.5%. All discrepancies were
resolved by discussion and consensus.
Summary of the Finding: Qualitative findings suggest that adult hospitalized
medical patients support suicide risk screening. The importance of directly
asking the connection between physical and mental health and the critical
role of follow-up interventions was emphasized. Patient opinions lend further
support for implementing universal suicide risk screening and prevention
strategies in medical hospital settings. Forty-three (81%) patients supported
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Week 3: Collaboration Cafe and more Assignments Nursing in PDF only on Docsity!

Study: Patient Opinions about Screening for Suicide Risk in the Adult Medical Inpatient Unit Purpose of Study: This analysis aimed to describe adult patients' opinions of suicide risk screening in medical settings. A 15-item feedback survey was given verbally by the Q’em data collector to all patients who participated in the QIP, showing that patient opinions can be utilized to inform the thoughtful implementation of universal suicide risk screening in the medical setting. Therefore, settings that treat medically ill patients represent an important venue for suicide detection and prevention. Research Design: Analysis includes a subsample of a larger quality improvement project designed to screen medically hospitalized patients for suicide risk. Discussion of the Sample: A convenience sample of 56 adult medical/surgical patients, age 18 years or older, who were admitted to one of three select inpatient units at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Research Center (CRC) during a single week in January 2012, were included in this sub- analysis. The NIH CRC is a 200-bed clinical research hospital. Patients were excluded if they could not communicate fluently in English, were cognitively impaired, or were experiencing acute worsening medical status. Discussion of data collection Methods: Responses to open-ended questions were transcribed verbatim and uploaded into NVivo 9.2 qualitative software for coding and content analysis. A group composed of a masters-level clinical social worker, a research assistant, and an advanced doctoral clinical psychology student used grounded theory and open coding, a technique of naming and categorizing phenomena, to analyze the responses. Two team members used the open coding procedure to code the comments and identify themes from the answers. A third coder reviewed the responses and discussed with the team to further refine themes. Eleven themes were established. A constant comparison method was used to refine the codes into larger themes. Interrater agreement was 90.5%. All discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus. Summary of the Finding: Qualitative findings suggest that adult hospitalized medical patients support suicide risk screening. The importance of directly asking the connection between physical and mental health and the critical role of follow-up interventions was emphasized. Patient opinions lend further support for implementing universal suicide risk screening and prevention strategies in medical hospital settings. Forty-three (81%) patients supported

screening medical inpatients for suicide risk. Common themes emphasized asking patients directly about suicide, the connection between mental/physical health, and the role of screening in suicide prevention. Adult medical inpatients supported screening for suicide risk on medical/surgical inpatient units. Strength of the Study: Forty-three (81%) patients supported screening medical inpatients for suicide risk. Adult medical inpatients supported screening for suicide risk on medical/surgical inpatient units. Behavioral health clinicians are uniquely poised to champion suicide detection and intervention in the general medical hospital setting. Limitation of the Study: Limitations of this analysis include the fact that data was collected using a small convenience sample of patients from a single setting as part of a QIP. Furthermore, as this setting is a clinical research hospital, it is important to recognize that participants who enroll in clinical trials represent a self-selected subsample of medical patients. Responses may not generalize to other non-research settings. In addition, non-English- speaking patients were excluded; this is an important population to assess opinions of in future studies. The qualitative analysis was conducted on open-ended responses to a single question, and answers were often brief. Recommendations: The Joint Commission's recommendation for screening in the general medical setting can move forward with the support of medical patients if hospital systems have the necessary resources. Early detection and training on responding to positive screenings may help alleviate some of the discomfort associated with managing suicide risk in the general medical setting. Suicide risk screening can only be effectively implemented if key hospital stakeholders such as mental health nursing, social work, and psychiatry work together. Behavioral health clinicians will be able to collaborate with non-psychiatric staff on inpatient medical units in various ways because of the increased risk of suicide screening. Staff nurses' concerns about mental health may be better communicated if behavioral health nurse champions are involved. Therapists in hospitals can play a key role in assessing patients who show signs of mental health issues and providing immediate treatment. In addition, behavioral health staff will need to lead the effort to connect at-risk patients with community mental health resources. Reference: