


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A concise overview of significant united states supreme court cases. Each entry includes the case name and a brief summary of the court's decision and its impact. Cases range from marbury v. Madison, which established judicial review, to obergefell v. Hodges, which recognized same-sex marriage. This guide is useful for students studying law, political science, or american history, offering a quick reference to landmark legal precedents and their historical context. It serves as a valuable resource for understanding the evolution of constitutional law and its influence on american society, providing essential insights into the judicial process and its role in shaping legal and social norms. The summaries are designed to highlight the core issues and outcomes of each case, making it easier to grasp the fundamental principles at stake and their broader implications.
Typology: Exams
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



1 /
established the principle of judicial review wherein the Supreme Court has the power to declare laws passed by Congress and signed by the president to be unconstitutional.
slavery in federal territories and slaves, as private property, could not be taken away without due process - basically slaves would remain slaves in non-slave states and slaves could not sue because they were not citizens
the facilities for blacks and whites were equal
unregistered guns (because it was unrelated to state militias)
1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20,000 2 each survivor
v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case of 1896. "Separate but equal" is Unconstitutional in the field of public education
right, the explicit recognition by the Supreme Court of a right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution emerged only in the middle of the twentieth century. In this 1965 case, the
2 / court spelled out the right to privacy for the first time in a case that struck down a state law forbidding even married individuals to use any form of contraception.
with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
reform is constitutional if applied to speech that is not directed toward producing imminent lawlessness and is not likely to produce such action is not constitutional.
whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a "prurient interest" and being "patently ottensive" and lacking in value.
jacket expressing opposition to the draft (and the Vietnam War). The conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court since his actions were silent and he made no attempt to otherwise disturb the peace.
that ruled that individuals, corporations, and unions could donate unlimited amounts of money to groups that make independent political expenditures.
its owners religiously object to if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest.
discretion on the part of the judge and jury resulting in lack of consistent administration of the penalty.
wars
4 /