Why do Change Management Fail, Essays (university) of Management Fundamentals

“Resistance to vary could even be active or passive, overt or covert, individual or organized, aggressive or timid……… and on occasions totally justified.” Sadly most significant change fails to satisfy the expectations and targets of the proposers. The failure is given the catchall name “resistance”, yet resistance is often principled and artistic also as from vested interest. Top management is typically unreasonable in its expectations and duration, forgetting the tactic it...

Typology: Essays (university)

2019/2020

Available from 09/02/2021

tomguide99
tomguide99 🇺🇸

4.5

(2)

389 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Why do Change Management Fail?
Subject: Management Paper 1
“Resistance to vary could even be active or passive, overt or covert, individual or
organised, aggressive or timid……… and on occasions totally justified.”
Sadly most significant change fails to satisfy the expectations and targets of the
proposers. The failure is given the catchall name “resistance”, yet resistance are often
principled and artistic also as from vested interest. Top management is typically unreasonable
in its expectations and duration, forgetting the tactic it went through when it decided to make
the change.
An effective change manager will prepare an organisation for change within the first
stages of project definition and stakeholder review, by taking managers through a uniform
sales process and responding to their apparent resistance: the “creative conflict.”
This process is perhaps getting to enhance the project definition and stock. it'll also
confirm that it's clear the moment resistance becomes “vested interest.”
It is unrealistic to expect an independent change manager to tackle vested interest
resistance but the change director can use his or her intervention as a symbol to the
organisation – such interventions should be few but telling.
An independent change manager could also be a cross between a foil and a lightning
rod – the foil ensuring that positive energy is deflected to the right place, the lightening
conductor removing negative energy from the organisation.
Avoiding failure: managing resistance:
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Why do Change Management Fail and more Essays (university) Management Fundamentals in PDF only on Docsity!

Why do Change Management Fail? Subject: Management Paper 1 “Resistance to vary could even be active or passive, overt or covert, individual or organised, aggressive or timid……… and on occasions totally justified.” Sadly most significant change fails to satisfy the expectations and targets of the proposers. The failure is given the catchall name “resistance”, yet resistance are often principled and artistic also as from vested interest. Top management is typically unreasonable in its expectations and duration, forgetting the tactic it went through when it decided to make the change. An effective change manager will prepare an organisation for change within the first stages of project definition and stakeholder review, by taking managers through a uniform sales process and responding to their apparent resistance: the “creative conflict.” This process is perhaps getting to enhance the project definition and stock. it'll also confirm that it's clear the moment resistance becomes “vested interest.” It is unrealistic to expect an independent change manager to tackle vested interest resistance but the change director can use his or her intervention as a symbol to the organisation – such interventions should be few but telling. An independent change manager could also be a cross between a foil and a lightning rod – the foil ensuring that positive energy is deflected to the right place, the lightening conductor removing negative energy from the organisation. Avoiding failure: managing resistance:

Resistance could also be a key element in why change fails. A recent informal UK survey of 120 government transformation programmes identified that:

  • 15% achieved their objectives
  • an additional 20% didn't achieve their objectives but were nevertheless considered satisfactory
  • 65% were unsatisfactory. A subsequent discussion forum on ecademy.com identified 7 key reasons why change fails. (The list is virtually a bit like one made by Kotter at Harvard 15 years ago).
  1. The organisation had not been clear about the reasons for the change and thus the general objectives. This plays into the hands of any vested interests.
  2. that that they had didn't move from lecture action quickly enough. This leads to mixed messages and provides resistance a much better opportunity to focus.
  3. The leaders had not been prepared for the change of management style required to manage a changed business or one where change is that the norm. “Change programmes" fail therein they're seen as just that: "programmers". The mentality of "now we're going to do change then we'll revisit to normal” causes the failure. Change because the cliché goes could also be a constant; so a 1 off programme, which presumably features a start and a finish, doesn't address the long-term change in management style.
  4. that that they had chosen a change methodology or approach that did not suit the business. Or worse still had piled methodology upon methodology, programme upon programme. One organisation had 6 sigma, balanced scorecard and IIP methodology all at the same time.
  • A successful change is vital in creating a change culture