



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
NWP 27 was created to streamline permit review for stream and wetland ... For Streams Tab), cannot impede aquatic life movement, and cannot occur in tidal ...
Typology: Exams
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




General Instructions: The following tables were compiled to help applicants quantify impacts and aquatic resource conversion on stream and wetland restoration projects and stormwater retrofit projects. Restoration impacts, while typically beneficial in nature, often have complex impacts. USACE has an obligation to track and quantify impacts to WOUS (including beneficial ones) and the following tables, if completed accurately, will help expedite their review and permit decisions. The tables have been populated with numbers of an example project to illustrate how to enter the necessary data. Example impact figures are available on the Baltimore District Regulatory website titled "Contrary Creek Examples." Instructions if you are seeking authorization under Nationwide Permit 27: NWP 27 was created to streamline permit review for stream and wetland restoration projects which provide functional lift, have minimal adverse impacts, and do not result in conversion among aquatic resource types. Populate the existing vs proposed resources table and the impacts table. Note: NWP 27 does not authorize conversion. If your project results in conversion as shown in the “Conversion by Resource Type” Table, then your project does not qualify as NWP 27. Exception: When vegetation is improved in a wetland, it may be counted as “enhancement” instead of “conversion” and will be assessed on a case by case basis (ex. Emergent wetland converted to Forested wetland when appropriate). Instructions if you are seeking authorization under the Bay TMDL RGP: The Bay TMDL RGP applies only to projects in the Chesapeake Bay watershed serving the purposes outlined in an acceptable Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL initiative. These projects are granted limited conversion, but can only be performed in degraded waters (verify in "Degradation Criteria For Streams Tab"), cannot impede aquatic life movement, and cannot occur in tidal waters. For retrofits projects: Fill out all tabs except for the “Degradation Criteria for Streams” tab. For stream restoration/enhancement projects: Fill out all tabs. Instructions if you are seeking authorization under IP or alternate permitting mechanism. Populate the “Existing vs Proposed Waters” Tab and the “Impacts” Tab.
Trib 1 Int RBP 70 Ponding P 2,000 250 POW Trib 1 Int RBP 64 Restoration/ Enhancement
P 750 200 Int
PFO1 PFO NA Haul road fill T 100 NA PFO PFO1 PFO NA To stream P 300 NA Per PFO2 PFO NA To POW P 250 NA POW
PFO 2 PFO NA Berm fill P 200 NA UPL 23,600 1200 Table showing impacts to existing waters. 1 Resources may be listed multiple times if they
receive multiple impacts during construction 2 See Section VI of the Bay TMDL RGP and the
"Degradation Criteria for Streams" Tab in this worksheet. 3 Identify your activity 4
P=permanent T=Temporary 5 Identify the kind of resource this particular area will be after construction
Impact Length (linear ft)
Proposed resource class post- construction^5
Contrary Creek Per BIBI 35% Old channel Fill P 20,000 750 UPL
Aquatic Resource Name 1
Existing Resource Class
Degradation Criteria 1 2 Activity^
3
Total Temporary and Permanent Impacts
Impact Duration^4
Impact Area (square ft)
Wetlands (square feet) 150 sq ft 0 150 sq ft
All Waters of the U.S. (square feet) 900 sq ft 0 900 sq ft
The Bay TMDL RGP may be used to authorize multiple conversion types for an overall project provided ALL the conversion thresholds are not exceeded.
Conversion to Uplands
Conversion Among Aquatic Habitat Types
Total Conversion for Overall Project
*Table classifying conversion. Compare to Tabel 1 below from the Bay TMDL RGP to determine if your project is eligible for review under the Bay TMDL RGP. If it does not qualify, it will be reviewed under an alternative permitting tool.
Streams, rivers, and other open waters 750 sq ft/250 lf 0 750sq ft/250 lf
Contrary Creek 37.5821 -83.7583 Perennial (^) 35% NA Very High/High Trib 1 37.5831 -83.7542 Intermittent NA 67 High/Moderate PFO 1 37.5830 -83.7584 PFO NA NA NA PFO 2 37.5823 -83.7548 PFO NA NA NA
Stream Degradation Criteria For Existing Streams*
Degradation Criteria 3: (Typical BEHI/NBS)
Aquatic Resource Name
LAT LONG Aquatic Resource Type
Degradation Criteria 1: BIBI*
Degradation Criteria 2: Modified RBP Score**