

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Written assignments of course on University of the People
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


In my analysis of the case study about the Harry Markham's Loyalty Dilemma. I will present it, I will also talk about the method that I will use with critical thinking and describe how I will use it in my presentation for this case study. And recommend a solution for this problem that has been a problem for Markham, the firm he works for and the pension funds. In the beginning I will present a summary of the issue that it is being given to us. I the beginning of 2012 Harry Markham was preparing for a meeting with the board of trustees of a state pension fund. After he had earned his Master of Finance in 2004, he started working for an Investment Consulting Associates (ICA), which was a firm giving investment advices to pensions funds. Harry was very concerned about the public sector pensions fund liabilities were being valued. He knew that if he used the liabilities using the valuation and financial analysis principles he learned in his Master of Finance, the numbers would had be twice as high, from what the fund were presenting. He then wanted to change those numbers, but the company he worked for and the pension funds didn’t care to change them since they were being captured from the Government Accounting Standards Board. So, he was wondering how he was supposed to give his financial advice when he knew that trustees were working from financials that he knew were grossly misleading. At the end everything came down to loyalty and the dilemma that was born from them like, loyalty to his firm, Loyalty to the board of trustees that hired his firm, and the loyalty to the pensioners themselves. As Markham believed was called for by the CFA Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. I will choose to as my critical thinking strategy the questions who, where, what, when, why, how. Because there are a lot of questions you can ask just from those 5 basics. Those words if you answer them you can have a complete situation report about the whole problem. With the question who for example you are able to understand like who would it be harmful to his decision the pension fund, the firm him or the pensioners. Also the decision that Markham will have to take about the financial position of the pension funds. The when question that is a very important one too, to cover the date 2012 and the time he is going to take meeting presenting the situation of the pending funds, and the time that he is thinking over his dilemma. What it is the problem that has appeared in for harry, and what he is thinking about solving it. On the question of where his decision will take him after he would had decided to do. Why it is the question the question we must ask, why that it is problem that ended up to Harry’s dilemma, if he will support his company, or the public board of trustees, or the people that being paying the public pensions, with this financial scandal that had appeared. And last question is how, he can approach this safely for the benefit of all the groups of people that will get influenced with his decision.
My recommendation about this dilemma it is for all the members to sit together and find the proper solution that can benefit all of the parts. But I believe that people responsible for the financial hole should face justice to see if there was corruption on how the money was handled. Therefor he should follow the legal ways, it is different to keep secrets about their clients, but covering up illegal activities it is immoral and should not be done by anyone. And the truth should come out and then all of the responsible about the current financial problem, and all together to find a solution for that mistake. But for me for sure justice must be given in this case because the pensioners have given money that wasn’t represented the right way. So yes I would had choose the hard road going against and the firm and the board of trustees, because my ethos can not be bought. TOTAL WORD COUNT: 710