Symbolism and Imagery in Wilfred Owen's 'Anthem for Doomed Youth', Study Guides, Projects, Research of English Language

A symbolic analysis of wilfred owen's poem 'anthem for doomed youth.' how war is depicted in the poem, focusing on the use of personification, alliteration, anaphora, and metaphor. Additionally, the document discusses the mourning rituals described in the poem and how they contrast with the reality of war. The document also includes information about the poem's form and meter.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/04/2022

Kristien_123
Kristien_123 🇳🇱

3.3

(3)

182 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ANTHEM FOR DOOMED YOUTH SYMBOLISM, IMAGERY, ALLEGORY
Symbol Analysis
In "Anthem for Doomed Youth," war is not what we might expect. Owen is all about exploring how war
can twist the way we see the world; men become cattle, artillery shells become choirs, and tears
become candles. Things in a world at war are not as they seem. In our speaker's eyes, the rituals of
mourning the fallen become mockeries, because they ring so hollow in the face of war's true horrors.
Line 1: Using a simile to compare the battlefield deaths of soldiers to the slaughter of cattle
conveys both the inhumanity of these soldiers' deaths, and also that they just might be dying
without really understanding why. They're headed off to slaughter, no questions asked.
Line 2: Attributing anger, a very human emotion, to the guns, which are mere machines is the
first instance of personification in a poem that uses an awful lot of personification. It's
interesting to note that while the soldiers are being dehumanized, the instruments of war are
actually, in a strange and terrifying way, becoming more human. Yowza.
Line 3: The anaphora at the beginning of this sentence (starting with "Only the," just like the line
before) helps build momentum, since when we hit the phrase a second time we pay a little more
attention. If something's repeated it's supposed to be important, right? Plus, that momentum
and the repetition of "only" add to the tension and horror of the battlefield, where there's
nothing but shells and dying men.
Line 3: The alliteration at the end of the line"rifles' rapid rattle"is another way of grabbing
our attention and building the intensity. Ramping up the momentum and intensity is obviously
very important here, since our speaker's throwing us into the middle of a war zone, and must
get the sheer terror across to us through the language.
Lines 3-4: Adding on to that alliteration is some more consonance. Just check out all those
double "t" words"stuttering," "rattle," and "patter." And, hey, why not throw in that "p"
sound in "rapid" while you're at it? Beyond being fun to say aloud, all this consonance also
mimics the sound of the rifles firing. After all there's a lot of "r" and " t" sounds, and what's the
way we usually represent gunfire? Yup: "ratatat tat" (or something like that). So all those sounds
give us a sensory experience of the battlefield. Not only are we reading about it; we feel like
we're there.
Line 7: The implied metaphor here (the shells are demented choirs) continues the trend
of personifying the weapons of war, but we should also notice that it goes the other way as well
by turning humans and human institutions (choir members and churches) into inanimate
weapons. The metaphor, by comparing them, blurs the lines between a choir singing for the
glory of God and country, and the shelling that just might be a result of, or at the very least
related to, that same nationalistic and patriotic fervor.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Symbolism and Imagery in Wilfred Owen's 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' and more Study Guides, Projects, Research English Language in PDF only on Docsity!

ANTHEM FOR DOOMED YOUTH SYMBOLISM, IMAGERY, ALLEGORY

Symbol Analysis

In "Anthem for Doomed Youth," war is not what we might expect. Owen is all about exploring how war can twist the way we see the world; men become cattle, artillery shells become choirs, and tears become candles. Things in a world at war are not as they seem. In our speaker's eyes, the rituals of mourning the fallen become mockeries, because they ring so hollow in the face of war's true horrors.

  • Line 1: Using a simile to compare the battlefield deaths of soldiers to the slaughter of cattle conveys both the inhumanity of these soldiers' deaths, and also that they just might be dying without really understanding why. They're headed off to slaughter, no questions asked.
  • Line 2: Attributing anger, a very human emotion, to the guns, which are mere machines – is the first instance of personification in a poem that uses an awful lot of personification. It's interesting to note that while the soldiers are being dehumanized, the instruments of war are actually, in a strange and terrifying way, becoming more human. Yowza.
  • Line 3: The anaphora at the beginning of this sentence (starting with "Only the," just like the line before) helps build momentum, since when we hit the phrase a second time we pay a little more attention. If something's repeated it's supposed to be important, right? Plus, that momentum and the repetition of "only" add to the tension and horror of the battlefield, where there's nothing but shells and dying men.
  • Line 3: The alliteration at the end of the line—"rifles' rapid rattle"—is another way of grabbing our attention and building the intensity. Ramping up the momentum and intensity is obviously very important here, since our speaker's throwing us into the middle of a war zone, and must get the sheer terror across to us through the language.
  • Lines 3-4: Adding on to that alliteration is some more consonance. Just check out all those double "t" words—"stuttering," "rattle," and "patter." And, hey, why not throw in that "p" sound in "rapid" while you're at it? Beyond being fun to say aloud, all this consonance also mimics the sound of the rifles firing. After all there's a lot of "r" and " t" sounds, and what's the way we usually represent gunfire? Yup: "ratatat tat" (or something like that). So all those sounds give us a sensory experience of the battlefield. Not only are we reading about it; we feel like we're there.
  • Line 7: The implied metaphor here (the shells are demented choirs) continues the trend of personifying the weapons of war, but we should also notice that it goes the other way as well by turning humans and human institutions (choir members and churches) into inanimate weapons. The metaphor, by comparing them, blurs the lines between a choir singing for the glory of God and country, and the shelling that just might be a result of, or at the very least related to, that same nationalistic and patriotic fervor.

MOURNING RITUALS IMAGERY

If you've got soldiers dying out in the trenches, chances are you've got some mourners back home. And the woeful widows and forlorn family members are having quite a different experience than those fighting guys out there in the heat of battle. So while the soldiers die senselessly—like cattle— the men and women back home are forced to try to make sense of it all with grieving rituals, songs, funerals and the like. But can those rituals ever equal the true experience of war? Probably not, says Owen.

  • Line 1: Ritual numero uno comes to us in the form of a rhetorical question. These "passing-bells" are a traditional (and religious) way to mark someone's death. But when thousands die at once on the battlefield, no bell rings for the individuals. And are there any sort of bells ringing out the deaths of these soldiers? Owen answers us with a resounding no , which is implied by the lines that follow.
  • Line 2-4: So instead of the ritual of "passing-bells," we're stuck with endless machine gun fire. That sound is a stand-in for the more traditional ritual of prayer.
  • Line 5: Bells? Prayers? No, says Owen, they're nowhere to be found on the battlefield. And that means that when we perform these rituals at home, we're really just making a mockery of the real stuff that's going down on the front.
  • Line 6: Funerals often have a song or two to send off the dead, right? But there are no funerals on the battlefield, and that means that artillery shells will have to metaphorically stand in for the choirs of a church.
  • Line 9: Here we are with another mourning ritual (the lighting of candles) and another rhetorical question.
  • Line 10: In this line, the ritual of candle lighting is replaced by the much more sincere act of crying.
  • Line 12: And the ritual of putting a pall on a coffin is replaced here by the more sincere image of a grieving face.
  • Line 13: The metaphor here connects the ritual of putting flowers on a grave with the patience and tenderness of those waiting at home. It might be suggesting that the compassion of others is as useful to the dying soldier as flowers on his grave (so, not very useful). Or it might be contrasting the two, with the compassion being a much more fitting and suitable way of mourning than the act of bringing flowers to a gravestone.
  • Line 14: This last line, as you can probably tell, is an image. But it's also a symbol that works in a number of ways. First, the setting of dusk reminds us (as if we need reminding at this point) of death. The drawing down of blinds might also be read as signifying the refusal to see all that icky darkness and death. This, we think, is not a good thing for our speaker. He wants us to see the darkness and suffering, and to acknowledge the terrible cruelties of war. It's the willing ignorance of such things, perhaps, that makes war such an easy sell. But it could also depict the

An iamb is a rhythmic foot (yep, foot) made up of a stressed and unstressed syllable (da-DUM) and pentameter means there are five of those feet in a row. That makes for about ten syllables per line and a rhythm like "and each slow dusk a draw ing- down of blinds " (14). Of course, in this poem as in many, it's more of a prevailing pattern than a strict rhythm that must always be used. But here's the thing. For all its iambic-ness and all its pentameter posturing, this poem sure does deviate from its own rules. Just look at the first line: What pass ing- bells for these who die as catt le? (1) Uh, Owen? We count eleven syllables. And what about line 2?: On ly the mon strous ang er of the guns That's not exactly perfect iambic pentameter. In fact, Owen substitutes what's called a trochee (think of it as the opposite of an iamb: DA-dum), for the usual iamb. Owen includes all kinds of variations like these—extra syllables, non-iambic feet, and the like throughout the poem. He's constantly keeping us on our toes, unsettling us as readers so that we can never get too comfy with the rituals of grief. We're meant to be off kilter, upset, and troubled. If we grow too at ease, we're missing the point.