






Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
A comprehensive overview of porter's five forces model, a framework for analyzing the competitive landscape of an industry. It explains the five forces that influence industry attractiveness and profitability: rivalry among existing competitors, threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, and threat of substitute products. The document also discusses the concept of extended rivalry, where competition can come from outside the usual players, and the importance of considering suppliers and customers as potential sources of competition. It provides examples and insights into how to apply the model in real-world scenarios.
Tipologia: Appunti
1 / 12
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!







We know that corporate strategy is about choosing which businesses to operate in, right? Right now, we need to decide how diversified we want to be and how much we want to integrate vertically, which we will talk about later. But the main question is: are we playing the right game? Are we in a game we can win? We understand that this depends on looking at both external and internal factors, including how attractive the market is and our strengths. Now, let’s take a moment to talk about external analysis. Analyzing the External Environment : there are 4+1 analysis that you can use:
A simple way to do this analysis is to: identify each possible factor, give each factor a percentage chance of happening and a score for its impact in the next 3-5 years, where: - 5 = very bad; +5 = very good. (Puoi stabilire l'impatto di un fattore e la probabilità che accada. Ad esempio, se pensi che ci saranno problemi con i fornitori di batterie, puoi dare un punteggio negativo, come - 5, e una probabilità del 50%. Così, il punteggio finale sarà - 2.5) In the end, you will have a score that helps you see the situation. Use the evaluations to create a matrix. The X-axis can represent impact, while the Y-axis represents probability. This helps identify which factors are the biggest opportunities and which are the most relevant threats. It is important to pay attention to events with low probability but high impact. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic was seen as unlikely, but it had huge effects worldwide. We need to be ready to manage uncertainty, not just risk. Understanding the <
The Direct Competitors matrix It’s important to know who your competitors are. Direct competitors sell the same product as you, while indirect competitors sell different products that could replace yours. Industry Concentration: this means how many competitors are in the market. If there are a lot of competitors, it is low concentration. If there are only a few, it is high concentration. Market Growth: this tells us if the market is getting bigger or not. If the market isn’t growing, there are fewer chances to sell more. Low Growth and High Concentration: In a market with many competitors and no growth, competition is very high. Everyone is fighting for the same customers. High Growth and High Concentration: In a growing market with few competitors, competition is low. Companies focus on working together to grow the market instead of fighting each other. Example of Renewable Energy: The speaker mentions the renewable energy sector. In this area, the market is growing quickly, and there are not many competitors. This means there is less competition among companies. THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS Structure determinants:
Example of barriers to entry: there are obstacles that make it hard for new companies to enter the market. Aer Lingus is the national airline of Ireland. When they entered the market, they faced significant barriers to entry from established airlines. These companies reacted aggressively by lowering prices and increasing flights to keep Aer Lingus from making profits. As a result, Aer Lingus struggled for many years, even almost going bankrupt multiple times. It wasn't until about 2002 that they began to succeed in the competitive airline industry after fighting for 15 years in a price war. SOBSTITUTES Substitutes are products provided by other industries that perform the same function as the product of the industry. Examples: Short haul airline routes vs. High-Speed Trains Airlines vs. Web Conferencing Aluminum vs. Steel Substitutes limit the potential return of an industry by placing a ceiling on the prices companies in the industry can profitably charge. The competition from substitutes is a function of:
Buyer’s characteristics the bargaining power of buyers increases if: they are able to integrate themselves backward, they have clear information about the product, the component or material cost is a high percentage of the total cost Spiegazione: le caratteristiche degli acquirenti dipendono dalla loro capacità di integrarsi verticalmente. Se l'azienda acquirente è in grado di farlo, il suo potere contrattuale aumenta, poiché rappresenta una minaccia per il fornitore. Ad esempio, l'acquirente può dire: "Mi offri un buon prezzo, altrimenti aprirò la mia fabbrica". Inoltre, se il costo del componente o del materiale è una parte molto alta del costo totale del prodotto finale, l'acquirente avrà un maggiore potere contrattuale. Se il tuo prodotto rappresenta una grande porzione del costo totale del prodotto dell'acquirente, allora il potere contrattuale dell'acquirente aumenta, poiché sei un fornitore molto importante per loro e vorranno negoziare con forza. Al contrario, se il prodotto che vendi rappresenta solo una piccola parte del costo totale, come nel caso di un tappo di penna, l'acquirente non avrà molta motivazione a negoziare. Se il tappo rappresenta solo l'1% del costo totale, anche una riduzione del 50% non porterebbe a un grande risparmio. Invece, se stai fornendo un componente che è una grande spesa, l'acquirente vorrà negoziare duramente per ottenere un prezzo migliore, poiché anche una piccola riduzione del prezzo potrebbe significare un grande aumento dei profitti per loro. BERGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS Upstream competition When we talk about suppliers, it's the opposite. It's exactly the same measures, just interpreting the different way The structural determinants of bargaining power of suppliers are dual to those influencing the bargaining power of buyers. The power of suppliers: Relative concentration The bargaining power of suppliers is higher if their business area is more concentrated than that of companies producing the product. Product/service’s features The bargaining power of suppliers increases if: product/service differentiation is high, switching costs are high, product’s impact on the final performance is high. Customer characteristics the bargaining power of suppliers increases if: their customers are not able to integrate backward, their customers have not clear information about the products, the supplying cost is a low percentage of the total cost (this means that if a component has a low-cost relative to the final product, the client company will not spend much time or resources negotiating that price. For example, for a company that purchases paper or internet services, the cost is so small compared to the total cost that it’s not worth negotiating). (Car manufacturers, like Volkswagen or Fiat, do not produce most of the components themselves. Instead, they focus on design, assembly, distribution, and sales. 85% of the cost of a car comes from external suppliers—companies that manufacture the components. This means that car manufacturers are highly dependent on their suppliers. Car manufacturers generally have very low profit margins, around 3.5% , so they make about $1000 in profit for each car sold. The reason these profits are so low is that they must give a significant portion of their revenue to suppliers)
Different industries make different amounts of money. Some are very profitable, while others are not. To understand how attractive an industry is, you need to look at how much money it earns. For example, technology industries usually make more money and are more attractive. Some industries, like hotels and restaurants, make about 8.5% profit, while infrastructure industries earn only about 5.8% to 6%. The differences in profit levels can be explained by factors like competition, supplier power, and customer choices (substitutes). Understanding the <
Strategic groups : A strategic group is «the group of firms in an industry following the same or a similar strategy along the strategic dimensions». By selecting the most important strategic dimensions and locating each firm in the industry along them, it is possible to identify groups of companies that have adopted more or less similar approaches to competing within the industry. Industries have strategic groups, meaning there are companies that follow similar strategies within the same sector. For example, in the car industry, it's too big to analyze everything at once. It doesn't make sense to compare Ferrari and Fiat because they operate in very different areas: Ferrari focuses on luxury sports cars, while Fiat makes utility cars. So, it’s necessary to narrow down the analysis to groups of companies that follow similar strategies based on certain factors. This approach helps to get a more useful and relevant understanding of market dynamics within specific segments of the industry. È più facile comprendere i gruppi strategici usando un grafico. Questi gruppi possono essere definiti in base all'ambito geografico e alla gamma di prodotti. Ad esempio, si possono analizzare produttori di auto di lusso come Jaguar e BMW, o produttori più piccoli come Bristol e Morgan. In alternativa, si possono considerare aziende globali come General Motors e Renault. Per analizzare i gruppi strategici in un settore come quello aereo, bisogna scegliere delle dimensioni da considerare, come i prezzi dei biglietti e il numero di rotte. Ci sono compagnie aeree low cost, come JetBlue e Ryanair, e compagnie globali come Delta. Si può anche separare Air France e altre compagnie di lusso. Inoltre, stanno emergendo compagnie che offrono voli a lungo raggio a prezzi molto bassi. Ad esempio, un volo da Londra agli Stati Uniti può costare solo 270 euro, anche se non è molto comodo. Mapping strategic groups Additional insights: Competitive rivalry is strongest between firms that are within the same strategic group. The external environment affects strategic groups differently. The five competitive forces affect strategic groups differently. Some strategic groups are more profitable than others.